Captains Judgement. Your opinions?!
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,641
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,641
If the Pax was calm after he boarded then its unreasonable of the Captain to have him offloaded, after all he could have denied him more Booze as a precondition & or requested a Doctor onboard check that he’s fit to fly.
You can ask your HON PA for a full explanation, since you were very directly affected.
#21
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,641
#24
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,731
Have seen this a few times happening in the U.S.,
too, unusually involving incomplete documents before APIS.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Stoke on Trent, UK (MAN ), BUE, BKK, DBV
Programs: LH HON***,UA,BA.EK Gold,AV.
Posts: 11,641
#26
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ZRH
Programs: LX HON Circle
Posts: 3,253
These Mexican authorities are the problem!!
A few months ago 2 other LH F pax and myself (also in F) were denied entry as they claimed all of us three were intoxicated, fighting with custom authorities and refusing to give our passports to the custom officers. None of it was true! They wanted us to sign a letter and claimed that a doctor measured our alcohol in blood. No one ever did!
I later received a written confirmation from LH that I was not drunk.
Turned out the Mexicans wanted bribary. As we didn't cooperate we were put in a sort of jail for 24h (I was forced to "sleep" on the ground without a mattress etc.) and I was sent back on LH (in C) to FRA 24h after I landed in MEX.
A total disaster. LH Mexican ground staff has also been completely useless.
There seems to be consistency and I personally believe that LH ground staff is even involved as it cannot be pure coincidence that only LH F pax are accused for things they didn't commit - and later on asked for money/watch etc.
A few months ago 2 other LH F pax and myself (also in F) were denied entry as they claimed all of us three were intoxicated, fighting with custom authorities and refusing to give our passports to the custom officers. None of it was true! They wanted us to sign a letter and claimed that a doctor measured our alcohol in blood. No one ever did!
I later received a written confirmation from LH that I was not drunk.
Turned out the Mexicans wanted bribary. As we didn't cooperate we were put in a sort of jail for 24h (I was forced to "sleep" on the ground without a mattress etc.) and I was sent back on LH (in C) to FRA 24h after I landed in MEX.
A total disaster. LH Mexican ground staff has also been completely useless.
There seems to be consistency and I personally believe that LH ground staff is even involved as it cannot be pure coincidence that only LH F pax are accused for things they didn't commit - and later on asked for money/watch etc.
Last edited by f4freeJunior; Feb 15, 2019 at 3:54 pm
#27
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
Better safe than sorry, I'll rely on the crew's discretion.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...whose-11410064
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...whose-11410064
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,583
Seriously, shouldn't Helga have some kind of Pursers Envelope to slip the Mexican officials in the event of this to lubricate entry of pax into MEX?
If LH choose fly to such places, make a lot of beans, they should not accept the ways of life there?
If LH choose fly to such places, make a lot of beans, they should not accept the ways of life there?
#29
Join Date: Feb 2013
Programs: LH M&M, BA EC, DL SM
Posts: 5,731
But LH should have at least been able to tell the captain that the pax is not the problem. Maybe they did and that’s why he flew back in 3K.
#30
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Geneva
Programs: LX SEN, AFKL Platinum, BA Bronze,
Posts: 5,635
These Mexican authorities are the problem!!
A few months ago 2 other LH F pax and myself (also in F) were denied entry as they claimed all of us three were intoxicated, fighting with custom authorities and refusing to give our passports to the custom officers. None of it was true! They wanted us to sign a letter and claimed that a doctor measured our alcohol in blood. No one ever did!
I later received a written confirmation from LH that I was not drunk.
Turned out the Mexicans wanted bribary. As we didn't cooperate we were put in a sort of jail for 24h (I was forced to "sleep" on the ground without a mattress etc.) and I was sent back on LH (in C) to FRA 24h after I landed in MEX.
A total disaster. LH Mexican ground staff has also been completely useless.
There seems to be consistency and I personally believe that LH ground staff is even involved as it cannot be pure coincidence that only LH F pax are accused for things they didn't commit - and later on asked for money/watch etc.
A few months ago 2 other LH F pax and myself (also in F) were denied entry as they claimed all of us three were intoxicated, fighting with custom authorities and refusing to give our passports to the custom officers. None of it was true! They wanted us to sign a letter and claimed that a doctor measured our alcohol in blood. No one ever did!
I later received a written confirmation from LH that I was not drunk.
Turned out the Mexicans wanted bribary. As we didn't cooperate we were put in a sort of jail for 24h (I was forced to "sleep" on the ground without a mattress etc.) and I was sent back on LH (in C) to FRA 24h after I landed in MEX.
A total disaster. LH Mexican ground staff has also been completely useless.
There seems to be consistency and I personally believe that LH ground staff is even involved as it cannot be pure coincidence that only LH F pax are accused for things they didn't commit - and later on asked for money/watch etc.