Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LH & other airlines may end up in court with consumer protection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2013, 7:23 am
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: VCE
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by moeve
This is not just about leaving people stranded it is about protecting funds that have to be paided a long time in advance.

Germany already has protection in place for packages but flights/ airlines were noteablely excluded from this. Also these TA's and package dealer are not allowed to take 100% of the price at the time of booking in order to reduce the potential damages. They are actually only allowed to take 20% until 30 days prior to departure AND these funds have to be insured with something called a "Sicherungsschein"

Now days airlines will take 100% payment at the time of booking regardless of if it is 9 months or 1 day out and this makes the risk so high.

Example for my flight over the next 6 months (those that are currently already well planned) I have over 7.000 Euros out there in unprotected funds that the airlines are using to fund their everyday business.

I am not so sure this will be a red herring since it would simply be an extention of something we already have and if you do try the maths on some of these companies you are bound to get quite a shock at just what kind of numbers we are talking about.
If we look at the Eurozone today- there are countries which have a higher probability of default than Lufthansa Group as rated by Moody's. Thus- there is a much higher probability that the EURO will default as opposed to Lufthansa group. The numbers here are much larger and are indeed shocking.

So before we turn this into an OMNI debate- the risk of Lufthansa not being able to honour their commitment to customers meaning that they will either travel on the flight as booked or have their funds 100% refunded is extremely low- and actually much lower in VAR probability than the EURO no longer being the currency which Lufthansa would have to refund. Now, many could say "That's ridiculous- the EURO will not be allowed to default"- however if we look simply at risk levels of the rating agencies we find that indeed the risk of a Lufthansa Group default is lower than a Eurozone default.

Consumer protection agencies serve a very real role and are important- however I would think they should be spending time looking into real every day costs for citizens and businesses- i.e. Fuel Surcharges as opposed to projecting the probability of a Lufthansa or any other airline default which is something the rating agencies did a long time ago.
TRAVELSIG is offline  
Old May 27, 2013, 12:07 pm
  #32  
htb
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: UA*G(1K), PC Diamond Amb, Marriott Titanium, Accor Platinum
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by oliver2002
Airlines do something similar on their end, so if you get your ticket via a TA you are somewhat covered... which partially explains why airline had no problems reprotecting JK bookings on their stock.
Does this explain why LH told me "Go away and leave us alone -- you must buy a new ticket!" when I approached them about my JK ticket operated by LH?

HTB.
htb is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013, 3:26 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: YXY
Posts: 3,506
Originally Posted by gum
In my personal opinion I would classify it as a misuse of the card if an airline charges a ticket and never delivers the service.
No way. It is not a misuse of your card if you choose to buy from someone who does not deliver.
sokolov is offline  
Old Jun 1, 2013, 8:28 pm
  #34  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: ZRH
Programs: QR Gold / M&M FTL / Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 655
Originally Posted by moeve
BE AWARE credit cards do NOT work like that in Germany or even in Europe. You only have 30 days to query an incorrect or fraudlant post. After that it is over. There is no such thing as simply disputing the charge with your cc company after the 30 days like in the US!!!

That means the vast majority of passengers are not protected as you might suggest.
In Switzerland, officially we have the same policy, you have 30 days after you receive your monthly statement to contest and ask for charge-back.

Anyway I asked and get refund 5-6 months later for a Chair I ordered in France and never get delivered (Visa Card).
I get refund also 2-3 months later for other products without problems (different Master/Visa).

Last edited by GalaxyChris; Jun 2, 2013 at 4:47 pm
GalaxyChris is online now  
Old Jun 3, 2013, 8:54 am
  #35  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by 8420PR
Which airlines are they trying to protect against? Air Berlin?
Bigger, better capitalized firms will have a lower cost of insurance. Is AB bigger and better capitalized than LH?
GUWonder is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2013, 10:27 am
  #36  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,106
Originally Posted by moeve
BE AWARE credit cards do NOT work like that in Germany or even in Europe. You only have 30 days to query an incorrect or fraudlant post. After that it is over. There is no such thing as simply disputing the charge with your cc company after the 30 days like in the US!!!

That means the vast majority of passengers are not protected as you might suggest.
I'm afraid the "30 days" rule is not a general one in the EU. (maybe in Germany, I don't know) As an example when MA went belly up, the ONLY well protected customers were those that paid with CC.

Bankruptcy is not fraudulent or incorrect charge. Also I'm quite unsure about this 30 days rule in these cases, too. Where do you get it from? In 30 days I might not even receive my CC bill!
WilcoRoger is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2013, 10:33 am
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: HEL
Programs: lots of shiny metal cards
Posts: 14,106
Originally Posted by oliver2002
The main reasoning behind it is what would the consumer do if the airline went bankrupt. What world do these people live in?
In one, where airline bankruptcies have been common occurence in the past couple of years.
WilcoRoger is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2013, 11:04 am
  #38  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Capetown
Programs: Marriott Lifetime Plat, IHG and Hilton Diamond, LH SEN, BA Gold
Posts: 10,167
Originally Posted by moeve
As I have already said I have tried it and and Master Card Europe told me it does not work that way here and that I only had 30 day after recieving the monthly statement to query a faulty or illigitimate post to the cc account.
They might tell you what you want. As long as they cannot produce a slip signed/authorized by you, they have a problem. They need a basis for a claim against you, not vice versa. The 30 days rule might work for other cases (eg. you didn't get the ordered goods or returned these), however asa it is a charge without authorization, the case is different.
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2013, 1:03 am
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
However the moment you book a flight you have to enter the CC details into the system you ARE ordering and the post is in part at least legit.

Now you are booking a flight say for in 6 months (on these No frills lines you will want to do that to protect your pricing) then it is a legit posting right up to the point where the airline goes belly up and it is clear they will nolonger be able to deliver the service they charged you for 6 months ago. Here in Germany at least banks and CC will not just recall payments made passed those 30 days and you will have to join the queue with all the other creditors and hope there will be something left for you to claim. This is what this insurance is supposed to cover so that the passenger is not out of his monies f the worst occurs prior to him recieving what he paid for..
moeve is offline  
Old Jun 4, 2013, 5:24 am
  #40  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,919
We might already have an answer as to way CP is taking these steps. A (türkish??) package operator here in Germany called GTI and its associated airline (XX sky airlines) went belly up this week.
moeve is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2014, 1:28 am
  #41  
Moderator: Lufthansa Miles & More, India based airlines, India, External Miles & Points Resources
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: MUC
Programs: LH SEN
Posts: 48,184
It seems LH Köln pondered over the matter for six months and dismissed the case against LH last week. VZ NRW will probably go to the next level.
oliver2002 is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2014, 5:18 pm
  #42  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,763
Originally Posted by oliver2002
Hmm... I really don't know in detail, but last year when KFA was about to go belly up, the IATA clearing house suspended their BSP. TAs have to provide extensive documentation and bank guarantees in order to be allowed to issue tickets. Airlines do something similar on their end, so if you get your ticket via a TA you are somewhat covered... which partially explains why airline had no problems reprotecting JK bookings on their stock.
KFA was suspended from BSP long after they didn't have the liquidity to refund customers. The only reason they survived as long as they did was because the Indian government didn't put a stop to the madness. An airline in Europe could not possibly last as long as KFA did in similar financial condition.

While some pax were protected, JK and MA's bankruptcies resulted in a financial hit for many passengers.
PVDtoDEL is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.