Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > Los Angeles
Reload this Page >

LAX seeks control over terminals

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

LAX seeks control over terminals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 4:40 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SoCal
Programs: AA, USAir, UA
Posts: 868
LAX seeks control over terminals

Hoping to increase capacity and lower fares, the city's Airport Commission will consider as early as today spending up to $154 million to take over several terminals at Los Angeles International Airport so it can offer more airplane parking spots to low-cost carriers.

For years, airlines such as Southwest have vied for more gates at LAX. But five carriers, under long-term leases, control a majority of airplane parking places at the aging facility, leaving the city's airport agency unable to accommodate multiple requests by other airlines to add flights. More than 60 passenger airlines currently offer service at LAX.

To receive those long-term leases, airlines used bonds to finance improvements to most terminals. The terms of the leases, airport officials say, allow the airport agency to take control of the terminals if it buys back the bonds. The agency is proposing that it pay the balance on the bonds for Terminals 2 and 5.

"I do believe it will increase competition at the airport and produce immediate gains in nonstop service and, particularly where new service is by low-cost airlines, produce lower fares for Los Angeles-area consumers," said Samson Mengistu, deputy executive director for administration and finance at the city's airport agency.

Los Angeles World Airports, the city agency that operates LAX, said in reports to the commission that it would use cash and credit to repay the bonds.
Read the rest of the article here:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...tory?track=rss

The biggest squawks are apt to come from Delta at terminal 5, although Northwest in terminal 2 is apt to be none too pleased either. Frankly, the biggest suprise I had was that there was no mention of terminals 6-7-8 that are dominated by United. Do they really use all that space?
mlshanks is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 4:46 pm
  #2  
NNH
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: LA, after growing up in London and living all over Europe
Programs: Ex-BD, ex-NW, ex-AA, BA Gold
Posts: 1,459
Terminal 5 is so disorganised that it seems to be above capacity already, with security lines spilling onto the sidewalks every night. T2, on the other hand, is a haven of calm by comparison. I'll be disappointed if my current timing of 10 minutes from kerb to WorldClubs lounge is slowed down.
NNH is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 9:31 am
  #3  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 139
Originally Posted by mlshanks
Read the rest of the article here:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...tory?track=rss

The biggest squawks are apt to come from Delta at terminal 5, although Northwest in terminal 2 is apt to be none too pleased either. Frankly, the biggest suprise I had was that there was no mention of terminals 6-7-8 that are dominated by United. Do they really use all that space?
Well, United does use all that space, but not the way it was intended. LAWA made a point of requiring smaller commuters to fly out of remote terminals. That's why AA Eagle flies out of the terminal across from Bradley and UAX used to fly out of the terminal east of T8 near the UA mx base. In the last couple of years, UA decided to move the commuters into the main terminal complex - mostly out of T8. So, LAWA wasn't thrilled with this but they must have come to an interim agreement. If they really want more terminal space, they could kick UAX back to the remote gates and open up T8 to someone else (US could certainly get good use out of it, then WN could take all of T1).
pgtravel is offline  
Old Jan 19, 2007 | 10:06 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: check swarm
Programs: DL DM & 2MM, AS Gold, SPG LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, Cava Sun member
Posts: 14,439
maybe NW could bargin for funds to remodel the WC in exchange for giving up their part ownership of T2, which is quickly becoming a dump. There are toilets in the men's room that have had plactic bags over them for years.
itsaboutthejourney is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 5:00 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seattle
Programs: Alaska Airlines
Posts: 1,037
I'd like to see Virgin America fly in and out of LAX with the freed up space.
fly4funsea is offline  
Old Jan 21, 2007 | 11:15 am
  #6  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 139
Originally Posted by nroscoe
maybe NW could bargin for funds to remodel the WC in exchange for giving up their part ownership of T2, which is quickly becoming a dump. There are toilets in the men's room that have had plactic bags over them for years.
I thought I remembered LAWA authorizing funds to redo all the LAX bathrooms or was that just for T3? They absolutely need to do something about those bathrooms in every terminal. I couldn't believe the graffiti I saw in T7 stalls and T1 bathrooms are overcrowded and poorly designed, especially the one toward the end of the concourse.

BTW, I did some math using Innovata schedule data for a random day last week and found that T1 averages 9.4 departures per gate per day while T5 averages 4.5 departures per gate per day. My blog post with all the info is here.
pgtravel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.