Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > LATAM | LATAM Pass
Reload this Page >

XL Seat or Emergency Exit on A 320/321

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

XL Seat or Emergency Exit on A 320/321

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Yesterday | 1:38 am
  #1  
Original Poster
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Programs: Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 95
XL Seat or Emergency Exit on A 320/321

Hi there,

I have two flights later this year with LATAM (GIG -> FOR & FOR -> GRU) and I'm wondering which Eco seat is preferable. Is it the XL Seat in rows 3-5 or the emergency exit?

Thank you very much
Zemb
zemb is offline  
Old Yesterday | 8:28 pm
  #2  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chile
Programs: LATAM Black Signature
Posts: 308
Great question — both are solid upgrades over standard economy, but they offer different benefits:
  • Exit row: best for maximum legroom. You’ll get significantly more space to stretch out. The trade-offs are slightly narrower seats (tray table in the armrest), fixed armrests, and no personal items at your feet during takeoff and landing.
  • Rows 3–5 (LATAM+): a more balanced upgrade — extra legroom (though less than exit rows), standard seat width/comfort, priority boarding, and quicker exit on arrival.
Bottom line:
  • If your priority is maximum space → go exit row
  • If you prefer overall comfort and convenience → rows 3–5
For relatively short flights like GIG–FOR or FOR–GRU, rows 3–5 are often the more practical choice.

One more angle to consider: the price difference might be marginal, it can be worth checking an upgrade to Premium Economy. You’ll get a blocked middle seat, more personal space, and an overall quieter, more comfortable experience — a noticeable step up from either option.


SCLflyer is offline  
Old Yesterday | 9:06 pm
  #3  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
1M
Community Builder
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, Hertz PC, Marriott Lifetime Plat, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 44,209
Originally Posted by SCLflyer
Great question both are solid upgrades over standard economy, but they offer different benefits:
  • Exit row: best for maximum legroom. Youll get significantly more space to stretch out. The trade-offs are slightly narrower seats (tray table in the armrest), fixed armrests, and no personal items at your feet during takeoff and landing.
  • Rows 35 (LATAM+): a more balanced upgrade extra legroom (though less than exit rows), standard seat width/comfort, priority boarding, and quicker exit on arrival.
Bottom line:
  • If your priority is maximum space → go exit row
  • If you prefer overall comfort and convenience → rows 35
For relatively short flights like GIGFOR or FORGRU, rows 35 are often the more practical choice.

One more angle to consider: the price difference might be marginal, it can be worth checking an upgrade to Premium Economy. Youll get a blocked middle seat, more personal space, and an overall quieter, more comfortable experience a noticeable step up from either option.
Having flown in an exit row (for no charge somehow selectable at booking) JFK-GYE and several flights in the XL seats (by chance, and twitter) for GYE-SCY GPS-UIO, I agree 100% with this. Exit row was great for legroom, but was narrow. I liked the first couple seats on my short hops to the Galapagos and back. I did risk seat roulette at checkin... but worked out.
beckoa is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.