KE vs OZ which is better?
May 9, 2007 | 12:37 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Programs: KE Skypass
Posts: 57
KE vs OZ which is better?
Well, I hv only traveled in KE before.....
so I whether OZ is better...as it seems to be pretty much the same~
For what I have heard...
it seems that service of OZ is better than KE
while the catering is both ok..........
OZ -- bibimbap, Ssam Bap......any other korean dish?!
KE -- bibimbap, bibim noodles, korean porridge, any more?
IFE: I think KE is slightly better~
Seat: Seems that KE has more legroom......
I dont realli kno....haven't travel in OZ before.......any ideas/ comments?
so I whether OZ is better...as it seems to be pretty much the same~
For what I have heard...
it seems that service of OZ is better than KE
while the catering is both ok..........
OZ -- bibimbap, Ssam Bap......any other korean dish?!
KE -- bibimbap, bibim noodles, korean porridge, any more?
IFE: I think KE is slightly better~
Seat: Seems that KE has more legroom......
I dont realli kno....haven't travel in OZ before.......any ideas/ comments?
May 9, 2007 | 2:18 pm
#2
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,894
I think both OZ and KE are very similar in their service and it really depends on your traveling pattern, home airport, and airline network. KE wins on routes out of Korea and its convenience for those residing in Korea needing to be somewhere on a nonstop flight. OZ, on the other hand, has better partner network with star alliance.
May 9, 2007 | 7:39 pm
#3
Join Date: May 2007
Location: HKG/YVR
Programs: KE Skypass, CX Asia Miles, SQ Krisflyer
Posts: 118
From what I experienced, the products and services of both airlines are basically the same, but the OZ F/As seem to be more friendly and their english skills seem to be better than KE's.
May 11, 2007 | 11:10 am
#5
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Seoul, Korea, Formerly Edgewater, NJ
Programs: KE Skypass Morning Calm, IHG Platinum Ambassador, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 52
As for me, KE is better...
My first frequent flyer program was KE Skypass. Most of my colleagues
prefer to fly with KE since KE has more destinations than OZ.
If we consider OZ's Star Alliance network, OZ might have more destinations
than KE. I guess lots of Korean people prefer to fly with KE since KE has more direct
routes from/to Korea. Just 2 my cents.
prefer to fly with KE since KE has more destinations than OZ.
If we consider OZ's Star Alliance network, OZ might have more destinations
than KE. I guess lots of Korean people prefer to fly with KE since KE has more direct
routes from/to Korea. Just 2 my cents.
Last edited by kiwanryu; May 11, 2007 at 11:23 am
Asiana hands down....
May 14, 2007 | 5:29 pm
#14
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,632
OZ wins for me
Definitely prefer OZ, since I am a *A member .... and hardly any SkyTeam flights fly to Australia anyway. Whereas there are plenty of *A flights coming to the land of OZ (aka Australia) !!!!! Not to mention all the cheap RTW fares offered from *A.
May 14, 2007 | 6:12 pm
#15
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: No longer loyal "over-entitled" 1K
Posts: 3,825
For a person who does similar amount of travel on both *A and Skyteam, I would say, at least ex-JFK, KE is 100 times better.
It really depends on where you originate.
From SFO and YVR, I would just take SQ over both KE and OZ and from LAX, I would stick with KE.
Summary
JFK/LAX - KE is better
SFO/YVR - Both are similar.
And I'm more of *A guy than ST guy.
It really depends on where you originate.
From SFO and YVR, I would just take SQ over both KE and OZ and from LAX, I would stick with KE.
Summary
JFK/LAX - KE is better
SFO/YVR - Both are similar.
And I'm more of *A guy than ST guy.