Jewish girls removed from klm flight for eating outside designated times
#47
Join Date: Jan 2005
Programs: SQ, QF, UA, CO, DL
Posts: 2,887
No.
The offending pax flew to Kyiv on KL, and according to the airline they misbehaved and were warned. They then flew back from Kyiv to Amsterdam on KL, and allegedly misbehaved again. KL designated them repeat offenders, so they were denied boarding on their connecting KL flight to New York, and rebooked on Delta. Once onboard the Delta flight, they again caused problems, and where thrown off the flight.
I figure this forum is the appropriate one.
Johan
The offending pax flew to Kyiv on KL, and according to the airline they misbehaved and were warned. They then flew back from Kyiv to Amsterdam on KL, and allegedly misbehaved again. KL designated them repeat offenders, so they were denied boarding on their connecting KL flight to New York, and rebooked on Delta. Once onboard the Delta flight, they again caused problems, and where thrown off the flight.
I figure this forum is the appropriate one.
Johan
None of us knows what exactly occurred, so we are all speculating here.
It seems highly probable to me that KL put notes in the bookings of these pax after their first JFK-AMS leg. The crew on the KBP-AMS flight would surely have been aware of this, have been expecting problems, and looking out for the slightest sign of trouble. They may have reacted tot what they perceived as a provocation, however innocuous, in the hope of forestalling more serious problems, but as a result instead upsetting the pax and causing an escalation.
I bet the crew on the 3rd DL flight were watching these pax like hawks from the second they boarded, ready to pounce at the first opportunity.
Again, pure speculation.
Johan
It seems highly probable to me that KL put notes in the bookings of these pax after their first JFK-AMS leg. The crew on the KBP-AMS flight would surely have been aware of this, have been expecting problems, and looking out for the slightest sign of trouble. They may have reacted tot what they perceived as a provocation, however innocuous, in the hope of forestalling more serious problems, but as a result instead upsetting the pax and causing an escalation.
I bet the crew on the 3rd DL flight were watching these pax like hawks from the second they boarded, ready to pounce at the first opportunity.
Again, pure speculation.
Johan
I have not been on KL during the pandemic but I have been on trains where they ask you not to eat or drink at the same time as the person sitting next to you. Maybe KL has a structure meal policy where aisles and middles cannot eat at the same time. Not sure, just speculating. The KBP-AMS FAs said that in addition to not following the scheduled meal times some passengers were in the aisles and not masked.
Other articles in Europe give better details. 18 Orthodox Jewish girls taken by security after misbehavior on plane | Abroad (netherlandsnewslive.com)
This is starting to remind me of the AA flight where a group of high schoolers would not wear masks....
#48
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP100K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,215
Let’s see what the “more to this” is if it exists. I’d also note the article above is two days old whereas the yeshivaworld article was written today. It gets quotes from passengers, and family members. I have no reason to doubt the veracity of the most current article.
But again I guess we’ll see…
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
I've never heard of it, despite ≈50 pandemic flights. None of the other posters here have reported hearing of it. That somehow leads me to the conclusion that there were not hundreds of passengers on the flight because they like a rule that doesn't exist. It is far more likely that they were on the flight because they wanted or needed to travel somewhere.
Johan
#50
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: where lions are led by donkeys...
Programs: Lifetime Gold, Global Entry, Hertz PC, and my wallet
Posts: 20,344
What rule?
I've never heard of it, despite ≈50 pandemic flights. None of the other posters here have reported hearing of it. That somehow leads me to the conclusion that there were not hundreds of passengers on the flight because they like a rule that doesn't exist. It is far more likely that they were on the flight because they wanted or needed to travel somewhere.
Johan
I've never heard of it, despite ≈50 pandemic flights. None of the other posters here have reported hearing of it. That somehow leads me to the conclusion that there were not hundreds of passengers on the flight because they like a rule that doesn't exist. It is far more likely that they were on the flight because they wanted or needed to travel somewhere.
Johan
Delta face masks
KLM onboard
Happy to be pointed at the rules that show the eating and drinking schedule for these carriers.
#51
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego
Programs: IHG Spire Amb, HH Diamond, DL Diamond and 1MM
Posts: 3,611
KLM (and AF) *Do* ask Pax to Keep Mask on Except During Meal Service
I flew USA - Spain two weeks ago. Outbound was on KLM and return was on Air France.
On boarding, both airlines announced that all pax are required to keep mask on for the duration of the flight with the exception of meal service. After reaching cruise altitude, meal service was brought out and soon collected from the pax who were first served. All plates were collected as soon as people could reasonably finish their meal.
At the conclusion of the meal service, it was announced, "Meal service is now concluded. KLM (or Air France), requires all passengers to resume wearing their masks." I have flown KLM (and Air France) a lot pre-pandemic, and the meal service, and especially the collection of the used tableware, could only be described as "very leisurely". Not anymore.
KLM is not directly saying when people can eat, but only that masks must be worn at all times, and they are allowing a narrow exception when *they* are quickly serving food and drink. They make this perfectly clear to anyone with half an ear open to the flight announcements.
On boarding, both airlines announced that all pax are required to keep mask on for the duration of the flight with the exception of meal service. After reaching cruise altitude, meal service was brought out and soon collected from the pax who were first served. All plates were collected as soon as people could reasonably finish their meal.
At the conclusion of the meal service, it was announced, "Meal service is now concluded. KLM (or Air France), requires all passengers to resume wearing their masks." I have flown KLM (and Air France) a lot pre-pandemic, and the meal service, and especially the collection of the used tableware, could only be described as "very leisurely". Not anymore.
KLM is not directly saying when people can eat, but only that masks must be worn at all times, and they are allowing a narrow exception when *they* are quickly serving food and drink. They make this perfectly clear to anyone with half an ear open to the flight announcements.
#52
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Bay Area - East Bay
Programs: UA 1k, AS 75k, Marriott Platinum, Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 641
It seems they were also kicked off a second DL flight after being booted from the replacement for the KLM flight where they were denied boarding, although on the DL flights it seems the reason was switching seats? This whole thing is a mess, and since a lot of the communication with the press seems to be through the lawyer for the girls I'm not sure how trustworthy any of these articles are.
https://news.yahoo.com/18-orthodox-j...160528386.html
https://news.yahoo.com/18-orthodox-j...160528386.html
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
KLM is not directly saying when people can eat, but only that masks must be worn at all times, and they are allowing a narrow exception when *they* are quickly serving food and drink. They make this perfectly clear to anyone with half an ear open to the flight announcements.
Johan
#54
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
I'm not sure how trustworthy any of these articles are. https://news.yahoo.com/18-orthodox-j...160528386.html
Johan
#55
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth (non-US)
Programs: NW Gold->CO->UA->DL PM
Posts: 1,340
On boarding, both airlines announced that all pax are required to keep mask on for the duration of the flight with the exception of meal service. After reaching cruise altitude, meal service was brought out and soon collected from the pax who were first served....
At the conclusion of the meal service, it was announced, "Meal service is now concluded. KLM (or Air France), requires all passengers to resume wearing their masks." I have flown KLM (and Air France) a lot pre-pandemic, and the meal service, and especially the collection of the used tableware, could only be described as "very leisurely". Not anymore.
.
At the conclusion of the meal service, it was announced, "Meal service is now concluded. KLM (or Air France), requires all passengers to resume wearing their masks." I have flown KLM (and Air France) a lot pre-pandemic, and the meal service, and especially the collection of the used tableware, could only be described as "very leisurely". Not anymore.
.
The coach experience last month CDG->ATL (gosh that's a long flight) was pretty much the same. (Oh let the upgrade price be low next week!)
I think there's a lot we evidently don't know here, accounts in the media are predictably thin and inaccurate, I've generally found KLM staff to be reasonable and very patient, and my experience of Orthodox Jewish girls might suggest that they are sometimes not nearly as innocent as they would seem.
We all would probably do well to step back, and head for a container of salt to sprinkle on this story.
Last edited by kthomas; Aug 9, 2021 at 2:46 pm
#56
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth (non-US)
Programs: NW Gold->CO->UA->DL PM
Posts: 1,340
#57
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,920
I am weary of such people. Just get them off the plane and don't ever let them on again. It is apparent from the news that this was a group of obnoxious selfish people. If they were truly religious they would have observed an underlying tenet of their faith that holds that the preservation of human life overrides virtually any other religious rule. The regulations were in place to preserve life.
#58
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Seattle
Programs: AS MVP100K, Hilton Diamond, IHG Gold
Posts: 3,215
I am weary of such people. Just get them off the plane and don't ever let them on again. It is apparent from the news that this was a group of obnoxious selfish people. If they were truly religious they would have observed an underlying tenet of their faith that holds that the preservation of human life overrides virtually any other religious rule. The regulations were in place to preserve life.
#59
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/SIN/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC, Bonvoy, Accor, Hilton
Posts: 2,920
It means the type of people who were removed from the flight. After reading the links and other information available it is apparent that this was a group of inconsiderate, disrespectful, hypocritical, uncouth, rude, boors. This had little to do with religious affiliation, because they could have been devouring a side of Texas BBQ Ribs and the result would have been the same.
#60
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Earth (non-US)
Programs: NW Gold->CO->UA->DL PM
Posts: 1,340
It appears reasonable to conclude (a) the meaning is "Jewish people" in the end and (b) if the commenter is called on that fact, they will identify other alleged characteristics, in a manner quite similar to when someone is called out for targeting black folx or others for undue discrimination.
I'm willing to believe the girls' behavior was far from stellar. I don't know what happened here, and none of us do given the paucity of accurate and clear reporting. Perhaps the KLM staff over-reacted; in any case we just don't know.
Is saying "such people" invoking a little bit of anti-semitism, perchance, given that we apparently have no reliable first hand accounts? Youbetcha; in any case it's sorting people into broad, perhaps racial, sweeping class generalizations.
(I came here seeing further specifics and some better sense of what actually happened, after all-- FlyerTalk being one of the few forums where one mightfind some accuracy. Frankly, I didn't come to hear anyone throwing around a phrase such as "such people," other kibbitzing aside).
I'm willing to believe the girls' behavior was far from stellar. I don't know what happened here, and none of us do given the paucity of accurate and clear reporting. Perhaps the KLM staff over-reacted; in any case we just don't know.
Is saying "such people" invoking a little bit of anti-semitism, perchance, given that we apparently have no reliable first hand accounts? Youbetcha; in any case it's sorting people into broad, perhaps racial, sweeping class generalizations.
(I came here seeing further specifics and some better sense of what actually happened, after all-- FlyerTalk being one of the few forums where one mightfind some accuracy. Frankly, I didn't come to hear anyone throwing around a phrase such as "such people," other kibbitzing aside).