Why does KLM not buy A380 ?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 552
Why does KLM not buy A380 ?
All major airlines, even the allied AF have A380 or at least on order. And it is now simple (?) due to the alliance with AF that KL repaints one or more AF 380s into blue KLM livery.
And AMS is now 380 compatible due to the EK 147/8 daily service which compete now with KLM using this large aircraft where KLM uses 'only' B744.
With other new planes (DC8 in 1960, 747 in 1969, DC10 in 1973, B787 in 2011, 777 also one of the first) they were one of the first.
Some destinations (JFK, LAX (?) , SIN) can be an A380 destination and now others (LH, BA, AF) fly 380.
Your ideas ?
And AMS is now 380 compatible due to the EK 147/8 daily service which compete now with KLM using this large aircraft where KLM uses 'only' B744.
With other new planes (DC8 in 1960, 747 in 1969, DC10 in 1973, B787 in 2011, 777 also one of the first) they were one of the first.
Some destinations (JFK, LAX (?) , SIN) can be an A380 destination and now others (LH, BA, AF) fly 380.
Your ideas ?
#2
Join Date: May 2010
Programs: Delta Silver, HH Gold, Accor Gold, IHG Platinum
Posts: 5,340
No demand. It would be a 2-class aircraft that, I think, would be far too difficult to fill. Also, I don't think there are enough routes which KL could execute a profitable flight on.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352
Johan
#5
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: AMS, CDG
Programs: FB Platinum
Posts: 254
Maybe the discussion should continue as: on which routes does KLM have demand high enough for a 380?
The OP mentioned JFK, LAX and SIN but my impression is that the SIN load factor is not very high, probably even lower than HKG.
The OP mentioned JFK, LAX and SIN but my impression is that the SIN load factor is not very high, probably even lower than HKG.
#7
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MEL
Programs: DL, QF, QR Gold, MR Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,003
Hmmm... how about AMS-DUS then?
Maybe some of the routes that are currently operated with 744s could be operated with an A380.
KL is very good at the fleet utilization game. I think such a large bird would throw things off for them.
Maybe some of the routes that are currently operated with 744s could be operated with an A380.
KL is very good at the fleet utilization game. I think such a large bird would throw things off for them.
#8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: FB Plat & DL KM, Le Club Plat, GHA Plat, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 1,591
I guess the idea that supply of seats is going to create demand for them has not crossed their minds
But bit more seriously, as for putting an A380 to LAX - they have just one flight on four days and two on Sat, Sun, and Thu. Both KL601 is typically on 747 and the KL603 on an MD11. Hence on days of both flight they could easily fill an A380. On the remaining days the costeffectiveness of seats on A380s could help attract paxs, but KL would need two A380s to guarantee daily service.
Perhaps they could start flying LAX-SYD with a DL code share, I believe those flights are pretty packed (though there is already a code share between DL and Virgin Australia. I can imagine that a Souther Cross route to Australia could be bearable!
But bit more seriously, as for putting an A380 to LAX - they have just one flight on four days and two on Sat, Sun, and Thu. Both KL601 is typically on 747 and the KL603 on an MD11. Hence on days of both flight they could easily fill an A380. On the remaining days the costeffectiveness of seats on A380s could help attract paxs, but KL would need two A380s to guarantee daily service.
Perhaps they could start flying LAX-SYD with a DL code share, I believe those flights are pretty packed (though there is already a code share between DL and Virgin Australia. I can imagine that a Souther Cross route to Australia could be bearable!
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,739
They may even face regulatory hurdles in restoring service to Australia via Asia, should they ever decide to restart that route (which I think also has zero chance of happening).
Last edited by irishguy28; Sep 11, 2012 at 3:09 pm
#10
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: CDG/AMS
Programs: FB Plat for life, FB PC, M&M FT, Hertz President (+ many low tier cards)
Posts: 2,777
I guess the idea that supply of seats is going to create demand for them has not crossed their minds
But bit more seriously, as for putting an A380 to LAX - they have just one flight on four days and two on Sat, Sun, and Thu. Both KL601 is typically on 747 and the KL603 on an MD11. Hence on days of both flight they could easily fill an A380. On the remaining days the costeffectiveness of seats on A380s could help attract paxs, but KL would need two A380s to guarantee daily service.
But bit more seriously, as for putting an A380 to LAX - they have just one flight on four days and two on Sat, Sun, and Thu. Both KL601 is typically on 747 and the KL603 on an MD11. Hence on days of both flight they could easily fill an A380. On the remaining days the costeffectiveness of seats on A380s could help attract paxs, but KL would need two A380s to guarantee daily service.
Hardly any flexibillity brings many risks of last minute change to another aircraft type which would piss off many people, or cascading delays through the A380 fleet pissing off even more. Having a backup A380 standing around most of the time would be bloody expensive.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 1999
Programs: FB Silver going for Gold
Posts: 21,803
KL do not, and as far as I know could never hope to, gain traffic rights on a US-Australia route under the terms of the current US-Australia air services agreement (which presumably limits such routes to US or Australian carriers. Emirates have seemingly wished to perform such a route for some time now - and finally can offer such a flight [as a codeshare operated by Qantas!])..
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
9 operators, 18 total orderers, do not constitute "all major airlines." It's a very limited-purpose aircraft, of no strategic use to most airlines or on most routes. Not many carriers have such intense global hub-to-hub operations.
#13
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: FRA
Programs: FB Plat & DL KM, Le Club Plat, GHA Plat, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 1,591
9 operators, 18 total orderers, do not constitute "all major airlines." It's a very limited-purpose aircraft, of no strategic use to most airlines or on most routes. Not many carriers have such intense global hub-to-hub operations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Airbus_A380_orders_and_deliveries
20 airlines, 257 orders and 82 aircrafts delivered.
But more to the topic of this thread - JFK, LAX have been discussed, what other routes do have a similar potential?
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 14,352