FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   JetBlue | TrueBlue (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/jetblue-trueblue-492/)
-   -   JetBlue @ LGA + DCA (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/jetblue-trueblue/1283796-jetblue-lga-dca.html)

LoneStarMike Mar 18, 2012 2:22 am

JetBlue's Application


Originally Posted by sfozrhfco (Post 18190693)
In their application B6 specifically says that SJU with continuing service to STT is their top priority and the AUS slot should only be considered if SJU absolutely will not be approved.

If that's the case, then JetBlue's application is not worded correctly. (emphasis mine)


JetBlue Airways (“JetBlue”) hereby applies for exemptions from 49 U.S.C. 41714 (h) (4) and 14 CFR Part 93, subparts K and S (“High Density Rule” or “HDR”), to allow JetBlue to add service in up to two unique markets: 1) one daily nonstop roundtrip flight between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (“DCA”) and San Juan, Puerto Rico’s Luiz Munoz Marin International Airport (“SJU”), the capital of Puerto Rico, with connecting service to St. Thomas (“STT”), the capital of the United States Virgin Islands; and 2) one daily nonstop round trip flight between DCA and Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (“AUS”), the capital of Texas. JetBlue requests two (2) slot exemptions for new service between DCA and JetBlue’s focus city at SJU and, if the slots for SJU are granted, two (2) slot exemptions for new service between DCA and JetBlue’s growth city of AUS, both of which are capital cities located beyond the DCA perimeter pursuant the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. No. 112-
95).1

1 In making this application JetBlue seeks consideration of its request to serve DCA-SJU/STT as its first choice. Only if that service to our focus city (SJU) is granted does JetBlue request that DOT consider its second request for service to Austin, Texas.
Shouldn't it read "If the slots for SJU are not granted..." and "Only if that service to our focus city (SJU) is not granted..."?

N830MH Mar 18, 2012 6:05 pm


Originally Posted by LoneStarMike (Post 18222232)

Shouldn't it read "If the slots for SJU are not granted..." and "Only if that service to our focus city (SJU) is not granted..."?

What is does this mean? I don't really understand why they won't approval it. Maybe they will have find someplace else.

LoneStarMike Mar 19, 2012 2:45 am


Originally Posted by N830MH (Post 18226228)
What is does this mean?

It means that DCA-SJU is B6's first choice. If it is approved, then they're asking for a second pair of slots to serve DCA-AUS. If DCA-SJU is not approved, then B6 is not asking for DCA-AUS as a second choice.

They state it again in the conclusion of their application


Based upon the forgoing, JetBlue respectfully requests the Department award it two (2)slots to operate service between DCA and SJU for the reasons set forth above. If, and only if, the SJU service proposal is selected, JetBlue also requests that it be awarded two (2) slots for service between DCA and Austin, Texas, again for the reasons set forth herein.
This is the opposite of what sfozrhfco said a few posts up.

sbm12 Mar 21, 2012 3:23 pm


Originally Posted by haddon90 (Post 18214853)
UA - SFO
AA - LAX
DL - SLC
US - ?

US announced today that they're going with SAN. That's going to likely put a damper on the AS, F9 and WN applications. And if that nixes the WN route then it might help B6 get both SJU and AUS, though I doubt any carrier gets two.

sfozrhfco Mar 21, 2012 8:36 pm

jetBlue will be happy just getting SJU as that is part of their core strategy to grow Caribbean markets. The other part of the strategy is to grow BOS business markets and AUS-DCA does not fit into that plan. If they got both SJU and AUS they won't refuse it but they are looking first and foremost to get DCA-SJU. AUS would be the icing on the cake but is not a top priority.

haddon90 Mar 22, 2012 11:45 am


Originally Posted by sfozrhfco (Post 18248496)
jetBlue will be happy just getting SJU as that is part of their core strategy to grow Caribbean markets. The other part of the strategy is to grow BOS business markets and AUS-DCA does not fit into that plan. If they got both SJU and AUS they won't refuse it but they are looking first and foremost to get DCA-SJU. AUS would be the icing on the cake but is not a top priority.

it's not a top priority over SJU, but it would be a nice route to have. B6 is growing in AUS, and to have the only flight to DCA would be huge.

rtalk25 Apr 5, 2012 9:41 am


Originally Posted by sfozrhfco (Post 18248496)
The other part of the strategy is to grow BOS business markets and AUS-DCA does not fit into that plan. .

Is growing BOS business markets still the strategy? B6 reduced BOS-ORD to just 2x daily, although a day trip (BOS-ORD ORD-BOS) is still possible.

jj1987 Apr 5, 2012 2:33 pm


Originally Posted by rtalk25 (Post 18340396)
Is growing BOS business markets still the strategy? B6 reduced BOS-ORD to just 2x daily, although a day trip (BOS-ORD ORD-BOS) is still possible.

Very much so. Barger has commented on BOS at nearly every investor meeting recently, Dallas was just added as a matter of fact.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:19 am.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.