![]() |
Originally Posted by KPT
(Post 23566510)
Oh dear, not this argument again. Can you also do the math for when your body is crushed by the wheels of a car or truck? I'll save the more gory calculations for later should still not be obvious as to why this is simply moving the danger from both pedestrian and cyclist to just cyclist.
|
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 23566287)
I'm curious that people think cyclists on sidewalks are dangerous or obnoxious. I have never experienced anything like this is Tokyo. On the other hand, I'm tempted 3 or 4 times a day to punch oblivious pedestrians who walk into you while talking on their phones.
I have only been driving daily since May of this year and already I've had a close call half a dozen times. Each time, it's the cyclist that almost plows into the side of the car because I didn't see them or didn't expect them to be moving at such a rate of speed. I have been told, regardless of who hits who, if it is a car verses bicycle, then the car will always be liable. |
Originally Posted by Taiwaned
(Post 23571676)
Turning left into an intersection, many sidewalks have trees, brush or a retaining wall that keeps driver's blind to what is coming on the sidewalk. Usually, after committing to the turn, pedestrians are walking slow enough that we can see them and stop for them. Cyclist, on the other hand, are moving quite fast and "suddenly" appear into the intersection (into the crosswalk) and I don't have enough time to react.
I have only been driving daily since May of this year and already I've had a close call half a dozen times. Each time, it's the cyclist that almost plows into the side of the car because I didn't see them or didn't expect them to be moving at such a rate of speed. I have been told, regardless of who hits who, if it is a car verses bicycle, then the car will always be liable. |
Originally Posted by Pickles
(Post 23568902)
Sure, cyclists on the road in Japan generally put themselves in danger. But I couldn't care less about that, that's their problem, not mine. Coldly and rationally speaking, moving the danger from both pedestrian and cyclist to just the cyclist is actually a step in the right direction.
Why do you think it is the case that in many parts of the world, children are allowed to ride on the sidewalk? It's for their safety. Yes, there are some people who need to slow down, but people are still people, whether they are under 12, or over it. The distinction is unnecessary. A 12 year old kid cycling as fast as they can still produces the same dangerous results. If you actually want to improve the situation, the situation is to increase public transportation coverage and reduce the need to use a bicycle. Where I used to live in the boonies, it was the fastest way to get around -- and the main route was a local highway with sidewalks on each side. Riding on the "street" would have been idiotic. |
Originally Posted by KPT
(Post 23572055)
Why do you think it is the case that in many parts of the world, children are allowed to ride on the sidewalk? It's for their safety. Yes, there are some people who need to slow down, but people are still people, whether they are under 12, or over it. The distinction is unnecessary. A 12 year old kid cycling as fast as they can still produces the same dangerous results.
Around the globe, including USA and Canada, they have a "Statutory right to the road" - this ensures that bicycles and cars are to share the road. Japan also is under a "right to the road by treaty". If EVERYBODY follows the rules of the road, it is a safe place for all. |
Thanks for ignoring the statistics. I'm pretty sure this is the same reason why this law is not being enforced at all. Pragmatism has prevailed. This idealism of "everybody" following some rule is never going to happen. People are individuals and make their own choices e.g. such as drivers who speed or run red lights, or people who choose to ride on the sidewalk knowing that they needn't worry about that.
|
“Facts are stubborn things, but statistics are pliable.”
― Mark Twain :p |
So how were we going to improve Japan ? ;)
|
Originally Posted by Q Shoe Guy
(Post 23572760)
So how were we going to improve Japan ? ;)
Oh, and more Starbucks, at least in my corner of Kansai. |
Originally Posted by nishimark
(Post 23572886)
Oh, and more Starbucks, at least in my corner of Kansai. |
Two hour limit on parking meters.
|
Customer Service: More flexibility when going off the book, or when policy is clearly not right (think of the customer) but the rules say otherwise.
This is by far I think my biggest complaint. You get nowhere trying to talk to someone -- there's absolutely no room for compromise. I guess people are used to しょうがない moments but it irritates me to no end. |
Originally Posted by KPT
(Post 23573428)
Customer Service: More flexibility when going off the book, or when policy is clearly not right (think of the customer) but the rules say otherwise.
This is by far I think my biggest complaint. You get nowhere trying to talk to someone -- there's absolutely no room for compromise. I guess people are used to しょうがない moments but it irritates me to no end. But every once in a while, I think about it objectively and remember it's better to get great service with inflexible rules than to have no rules and get totally lousy service (like in the U.S.). |
Originally Posted by 5khours
(Post 23574121)
I get really frustrated with this as well. Especially when you try to ask why they can't do something.
But every once in a while, I think about it objectively and remember it's better to get great service with inflexible rules than to have no rules and get totally lousy service (like in the U.S.). |
English translation for the AC remote controls in some hotels. (This may just be a Toyoko Inn thing.)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 5:18 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.