FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Hyatt | World of Hyatt (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/hyatt-world-hyatt-418/)
-   -   Hyatt Will Not Honor Rsvs in CA properties from out of state travelers (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/hyatt-world-hyatt/2029907-hyatt-will-not-honor-rsvs-ca-properties-out-state-travelers.html)

JIMCHI Dec 8, 2020 10:17 am

Hyatt Will Not Honor Rsvs in CA properties from out of state travelers
 
I just received an e-mail from Hyatt stating that they will not honor reservations at all Hyatt properties in California from out-of-state residents except those who are considered "essential workers, are traveling to care for a vulnerable person, or who will stay for a minimum of 14 days". This is due to new restrictions imposed by the state due to COVID. I'm not sure how they will enforce any of this\.

myperks Dec 8, 2020 10:42 am


Originally Posted by JIMCHI (Post 32871164)
I just received an e-mail from Hyatt stating that they will not honor reservations at all Hyatt properties in California from out-of-state residents except those who are considered "essential workers, are traveling to care for a vulnerable person, or who will stay for a minimum of 14 days". This is due to new restrictions imposed by the state due to COVID. I'm not sure how they will enforce any of this\.

so in-state residents are good?

Trustguy Dec 8, 2020 10:46 am

I have a reservation for Saturday night this weekend, and I called the hotel to find out whether they would let me stay (I am a California resident). Hotel told me they would honor my reservation, but they were not accepting new reservations except for folks deemed essential. I guess this will be the norm for the next 3 weeks, at least.

dkc192 Dec 8, 2020 10:48 am


Originally Posted by myperks (Post 32871269)
so in-state residents are good?

Allowing in-state residents would be against the letter and spirit of the order they are trying to comply with here, which makes no distinction between non-essential travel from in-state vs out-of-state residents IIRC.

myperks Dec 8, 2020 10:53 am


Originally Posted by dkc192 (Post 32871288)
Allowing in-state residents would be against the letter and spirit of the order they are trying to comply with here, which makes no distinction between non-essential travel from in-state vs out-of-state residents.

which I get but the email from hyatt make it sound like in-star residents are okay.

JIMCHI Dec 8, 2020 11:08 am


Originally Posted by myperks (Post 32871269)
so in-state residents are good?

So far, yes.

EuropeanPete Dec 8, 2020 12:14 pm

Couldn't an alternative headline simply be "Hotel follows law"?

zip10001 Dec 8, 2020 12:22 pm

Same email
 
I received the same notification from Hyatt.
My stay in LA was dec 10 to dec 11.
i work in financial services so CA seems to consider us as “essential workers”.

But this is not a business trip anyway.

The last minute cancellation sucks.

airBNB to the rescue!

JIMCHI Dec 8, 2020 12:56 pm


Originally Posted by zip10001 (Post 32871613)
I received the same notification from Hyatt.
My stay in LA was dec 10 to dec 11.
i work in financial services so CA seems to consider us as “essential workers”.

But this is not a business trip anyway.

The last minute cancellation sucks.

airBNB to the rescue!

I always wonder, who isn't an "essential worker" ?

fotographer Dec 8, 2020 2:50 pm


Originally Posted by JIMCHI (Post 32871722)
I always wonder, who isn't an "essential worker" ?

for me.. anyone that puts food on the table....

Kacee Dec 8, 2020 4:47 pm

I really sympathize with the properties trying to deal with the ever-changing governmental policies.

As a practical matter, there's no meaningful way to enforce the "essential worker" or "traveling to care for a vulnerable person" restrictions, at least not consistent with American cultural and political norms.

Ryno1234 Dec 8, 2020 6:27 pm

wonder if Marriott and/or Hilton are following suit. I was at the Hyatt LAX last week. i dodged a bullet.

Doppy Dec 8, 2020 6:38 pm


Originally Posted by Kacee (Post 32872237)
As a practical matter, there's no meaningful way to enforce the "essential worker" or "traveling to care for a vulnerable person" restrictions, at least not consistent with American cultural and political norms.

Also pretty hard to enforce the "resident" part, since there is no mandatory public state of resident registry in the US.

mbmd Dec 8, 2020 8:20 pm


Originally Posted by smilee (Post 32872435)
If this trip is non-essential why are you taking it and putting other people's health at risk?

Because the bloggers say it's O.K. to travel! (sarcasm).

FlyDeltaMD88 Dec 8, 2020 8:20 pm


Originally Posted by EuropeanPete (Post 32871586)
Couldn't an alternative headline simply be "Hotel follows law"?

What law is that?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:55 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.