Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Hyatt | World of Hyatt
Reload this Page >

World of Hyatt - Globalist Breakfast Changes

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

World of Hyatt - Globalist Breakfast Changes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 17, 2017, 6:41 am
  #61  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
Originally Posted by banzani
I read the T&C a few times and don't find them to be clear for this case. They do no state the children have to stay in the same room. It's also a bit disappointing since I am a regular at this hotel since many years. They had explicitly allowed this on previous pre-WoH stays...
Status benefits have always been applicable only for the (one) room the status holders is registered in.

That you get points for up to 3 rooms, can sometimes apply a DSU/TSU to a second room, or transfer them with GOH are the few exceptions.

WOH has changed nothing in this regard. Just that some properties now have decided to not offer additional benefits they did before (some have also discontinued room service breakfast). But you were never entitled to lounge access or free breakfast for that second or third room.... Most properties are generous when two rooms are booked, but it's a nice gesture... not an entitlement.

Make that 2nd room a GOH and you will know for sure.
RTW1 is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 12:17 pm
  #62  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Originally Posted by banzani
I read the T&C a few times and don't find them to be clear for this case. They do no state the children have to stay in the same room. It's also a bit disappointing since I am a regular at this hotel since many years. They had explicitly allowed this on previous pre-WoH stays...
The T&C do state that in order to get the free breakfast, the two children must be registered guests in the (same) room. However, there's literally no requirement that the kids actually stay or sleep in the same room as the elite.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 1:04 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Programs: M&M FQT, BA G, Bonvoy LTT, WoH GLOB
Posts: 960
You're correct. It wasn't mentioned in the high-level Benefits listed on the website, but it is mentioned in the detailed T&C. So GoH it is then. I still find it unnecessarily stingy by the hotel though. Perhaps it's just a new person working there, often these things come down to the individual responding.
banzani is offline  
Old May 17, 2017, 11:10 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,385
I thought with the term "registered guest" in both HGP and WOH it was limited to the maximum occupancy of the room (just not enforced at all before March).
yerffej201 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 12:26 am
  #65  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
It is.... but now even more restricted with the 2 adults + 2 kids max.
So even with 3 or 4 adults in a suite you wouldn't all be entitled to a free breakfast... unless the property is generous.
RTW1 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 4:14 am
  #66  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Do the two children have to be minors to qualify for being part of this 2+2 breakfast benefit?

In other words, are adult children excluded? Are the "children" required to be the children of the loyalty program member entitled to the 2+2 benefit?

If so, are the hotels going to start asking to see proof of relationship and proof of age for those additional guests in the room?

Hyatt could have had the benefit set up for to be applicable up to the number of guests in a room based on room occupancy, but Hyatt decided to make this more complicated than it needed to be -- all to be cheap.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 7:39 am
  #67  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
I don't read the rule as saying "your children" so the relationship doesn't matter. It could be your own kid and his/her friend or two kids you're mentoring.

Also, I would interpret children as being at or below the age for which the hotel defines guests as children. It depends on the location and could be 12 in some places, perhaps 18 at other locations.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 1:09 pm
  #68  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Watchlisted by the prejudiced, en route to purgatory
Programs: Just Say No to Fleecing and Blacklisting
Posts: 102,095
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
I don't read the rule as saying "your children" so the relationship doesn't matter. It could be your own kid and his/her friend or two kids you're mentoring.

Also, I would interpret children as being at or below the age for which the hotel defines guests as children. It depends on the location and could be 12 in some places, perhaps 18 at other locations.
Shouldn't the changed rules for breakfast be standard and consistent enough that terms used in them are defined or otherwise not subject to different interpretations? A benefit application being left to hotel determination or other interpretation hasn't exactly worked out as a uniform improvement for customers.
GUWonder is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 1:37 pm
  #69  
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Between AMS and BRU
Posts: 8,852
In my opinion they are as clear as they can be....... only when you want to push the benefit will you be making interpretations that aren't justified. Occupants in a second room, children or others, were never eligable for a free breakfast or lounge access. Even when lots of properties chose to extend them.

The definition of what is considered a child is country/property dependent, and that is also refected here. Just as it is when determining max room occupancy. And nobody cares whos children they are, just that they are registered as guests in the room.

But I'm sure we will soon end up with something like "limited to the registered guests in the room, maximum 2".
RTW1 is offline  
Old May 18, 2017, 6:19 pm
  #70  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Originally Posted by RTW1
In my opinion they are as clear as they can be....... only when you want to push the benefit will you be making interpretations that aren't justified. Occupants in a second room, children or others, were never eligable for a free breakfast or lounge access. Even when lots of properties chose to extend them.

The definition of what is considered a child is country/property dependent, and that is also refected here. Just as it is when determining max room occupancy. And nobody cares whos children they are, just that they are registered as guests in the room.

But I'm sure we will soon end up with something like "limited to the registered guests in the room, maximum 2".
That would sound good to me, or even better, to avoid problems, only the Glob staying in the room gets breakfast and lounge access, with exceptions if two Globs are registered to share a room. It would help to solve the problem of overcrowded lounges.

I suspect that the definition of children (age range) varies by location because of how occupants are defined in the local fire code that gives occupancy limits. There are also some local norms regarding the age at which kids no longer share rooms with parents or can no longer expect to stay in a hotel for free or to eat for free when staying in a hotel with parents.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 5:11 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1
Thumbs down Hyatt North Richardson - Grat not included as a breakfast benefit

I recently saw my bill had a charge of 10.74 so I called and they stated that gratuity is no longer included as a breakfast benefit. The breakfast for 2 was $30.00 and they added a tip of 33% for the gratuity. I told the person to have the manager call me because that is not what I read the new WoH program benefits stated. I told the guy on the phone, is hyatt changing the rules every month? He stated it is just another change in their program. I did write an email to Hyatt to provide the latest rules. I hate surprises on my bill after I leave. And who tips 33%?
go4amiller is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 5:35 pm
  #72  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Upper Sternistan
Posts: 10,043
Just got home from Andaz Tokyo. They didn't even ask me to sign a bill for breakfast.

And breakfast there is as fantastic as ever.
josephstern is online now  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 5:51 pm
  #73  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Pacific Northwest
Programs: UA Gold 1MM, AS 75k, AA Plat, Bonvoyed Gold, Honors Dia, Hyatt Explorer, IHG Plat, ...
Posts: 16,851
Originally Posted by go4amiller
I recently saw my bill had a charge of 10.74 so I called and they stated that gratuity is no longer included as a breakfast benefit. The breakfast for 2 was $30.00 and they added a tip of 33% for the gratuity. I told the person to have the manager call me because that is not what I read the new WoH program benefits stated. I told the guy on the phone, is hyatt changing the rules every month? He stated it is just another change in their program. I did write an email to Hyatt to provide the latest rules. I hate surprises on my bill after I leave. And who tips 33%?
I'd ask them to remove the charge or a chargeback is forthcoming. A tip is something voluntary, you are not required to tip. From your message I can't tell if you chose to tip something, but it seems clear you did not agree to tip 33%.

Where are the WoH Concierges here to clarify the rules?

Welcome to Flyertalk!
notquiteaff is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 6:07 pm
  #74  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Four Seasons Contributor BadgeHyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 10,053
Originally Posted by josephstern
Just got home from Andaz Tokyo. They didn't even ask me to sign a bill for breakfast.

And breakfast there is as fantastic as ever.
Hope you ate the nutella brioche! I've never had to sign there either.
Aventine is offline  
Old Jul 12, 2017, 6:25 pm
  #75  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,459
Originally Posted by go4amiller
I recently saw my bill had a charge of 10.74 so I called and they stated that gratuity is no longer included as a breakfast benefit. The breakfast for 2 was $30.00 and they added a tip of 33% for the gratuity. I told the person to have the manager call me because that is not what I read the new WoH program benefits stated. I told the guy on the phone, is hyatt changing the rules every month? He stated it is just another change in their program. I did write an email to Hyatt to provide the latest rules. I hate surprises on my bill after I leave. And who tips 33%?
Oh man, I would so not let this one go. Here's the current published T&C re Globalist breakfast:

Globalists will receive daily complimentary full breakfast (which includes one entrée or standard breakfast buffet, juice, and coffee, as well as tax, gratuity and service charges) for each registered guest in the room, up to a maximum of two (2) adults and two (2) children.
WoH Terms & Conditions

Originally Posted by notquiteaff
Where are the WoH Concierges here to clarify the rules?
There is nothing to clarify. Property is flat out wrong.
Kacee is online now  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.