Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Hyatt | World of Hyatt
Reload this Page >

Churchill or Andaz LS for Suite Upgrade?

Churchill or Andaz LS for Suite Upgrade?


Old Nov 6, 11, 8:02 am
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: AA EXP, UA*G, HH Dia, MR Platinum, IHG Amb/Plat, Hyatt Exp
Posts: 4,298
Churchill or Andaz LS for Suite Upgrade?

We plan to burn a Hyatt Chase card Diamond signup bonus providing 2 free nights in a suite. In London, is the Andaz or Churchill a better bet? Both have availability for our nights, which are just after New Year.

Explore is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 11, 9:46 am
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 16,927
I have only stayed at the Andaz once but was eventually upgraded to a suite there. They must have some good suites, but the one I got was pretty strangely laid out -- two rooms around a corner connected by a door through a short diagonal wall.

Based on that experience, I'd pick the Churchill in a flash, where I've always enjoyed the suites.

Better yet, change your plans to go to Paris and stay at the PH Vendome!
RichardInSF is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 11, 10:36 am
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 142
so though i'm a big fan of the andaz.... i'd have to say the churchill - unless you can get confirmed into one of the larger suites at the andaz (202 and 302 are very nice indeed - sprawling, high-celinged rooms with nespresso machines and upgraded everything). however, some of the andaz suites are rather small and/or oddly laid out - i generally prefer the large king rooms to those entry-level suites. so the best use of those free-suite certificates is probably the churchill, where the suite is a definite step up from the club room you'd get on a points/paid night.
limelight is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 11, 8:27 pm
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 325
I used my Hyatt Visa suite nights at the Churchill last year and then used a suite upgrade a few weeks ago for Andaz so have experienced both.

At the Churchill I needed a connecting room for the kids so we actually got one of the corner suites which I have to say was very nice indeed. Basically the corner suite had 2 bathrooms (a smaller guest bathroom which included a shower, no tub and a great master bath with large tub, double sinks and seperate shower). Seperate lounge and sliding doors dividing the bedroom. I was at the Churchill a couple of weeks ago and also got a complimentary suite upgrade to one of the newer suites on 9 and again it was great including a roof top balacony, with two bathrooms although this time the smaller bathroom didn't include a shower just WC and vanity. - pity I was there for less than 24hrs.

At andaz I got one of the larger suites (they made a point of saying I had been upgraded from regular suite). It was a one large room with high ceilings, lots of windows but bathroom was a bit of a let down basically small and just the tub with no seperate shower stall (some of the large king rooms I have stayed in have a larger/better bathrooms). As noted the room was one large space with sofa that comfortably sat 3 people, 2 chairs and large bookcase/TV unit which was the divider between the bedroom and the living room. Was a good setup but would on balance say that I prefer the Churchill setup over Andaz.

cmanc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old Nov 7, 11, 7:48 am
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Programs: AA3MMEXP, BAGold, UA1MMPremGold, Marriott PlatPremAmb, AccorPlat, HHGold, IC PlatAmb, HyattExplorist
Posts: 4,301
I agree with the above recommendations. Suites at the Andaz can be very strange--Churchill's are far more consistent.
rfrost is offline  
Reply With Quote

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread