Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Hotels and Places to Stay > Hilton | Hilton Honors
Reload this Page >

Hilton Q1/2015 Call: New budget brand & interest in Starwood (brand)?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Hilton Q1/2015 Call: New budget brand & interest in Starwood (brand)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 31, 2015, 6:46 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: West Michigan
Programs: DL, UA, AA, B6, BA (airline status-free leisure traveler), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 1,963
Originally Posted by ChinaShrek
I love the idea of a brand below Hampton Inns. If people can stay in Boston, NYC, or San Francisco for around $100 per night or along the highway for $50 per night then they will get a lot of business. Maybe these will become the new category 1 hotels?
The article said that it would be a mid-scale product. I would guess the rates to be more like $75-ish for a highway property and $150-ish for those in a city center.
loomis is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2015, 5:22 am
  #32  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Programs: HH D
Posts: 1,641
Would be a good thing if the new brand would cover more remote areas of the country, where currently there's no Hilton presence at all.
Sisosig is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2015, 9:13 am
  #33  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CLE, DCA, and 30k feet
Programs: Honors LT Diamond; United 1K; Hertz PC
Posts: 4,168
Maybe it's just me but I thought Home2 was intended to be a "lower than Hampton" brand -- the HHonors benefits seem to be terrible/on par to slightly worse than Hampton.... but I've never stayed at one (because the brand has conveyed absolutely no value proposition to me thus far and there aren't any properties in most of the places I stay)...

I'm not sure another new brand is the right answer, perhaps pulling down Hampton (or a "Hampton Inn Express" [reviving the Hampton Hometown prototype?]) would make more sense... IMO, aside from the onsite F&B HIS and HGI are becoming more and more indistinguishable at a high level.

I do agree that it would be nice to get properties in the middle of nowhere -- while I don't usually have problems finding something within a half hour of where I want to be, it is annoying that there's no Hilton presence near my grandparents place in Northern Michigan or a client in Northern California (Nearest HGI/HIS is 90 minutes away in Reno; I don't think there's any national branded lodging closer...so that probably says something about demand in that market)
lincolnjkc is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2015, 9:36 am
  #34  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,691
I would go for the LQ idea. I like the idea of a lower priced brand, but fear the honors benefits would be non existent. .. get ready for only 50 bonus points or a bottle of water.
Crazyhotelguy is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2015, 9:46 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,324
Originally Posted by Sisosig
Yesterday, it was again confirmed that Hilton are going to startup a new brand, below the Hampton Inns.

http://www.travelagentcentral.com/ac...d-hilton-52534

http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/m...tel-brand.html
“There is no good midscale product,” he said. “We think the demand is there, but the reason no one is building them is that there are no products that resonate with the customer.” He said he hopes Hilton’s new midscale brand will eventually grow to “thousands of hotels” in its portfolio The reason no one is building them is because it can't be done but I am glad they are going to try.
HHonors OUTSIDER is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2015, 2:05 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Programs: HH D
Posts: 1,641
Originally Posted by HHonors OUTSIDER
The reason no one is building them is because it can't be done but I am glad they are going to try.
I do not fully agree. Just like lincolnjkc writes: "Northern California: Nearest HGI/HIS is 90 minutes away in Reno."

While Choice Hotels have got about 10 properties in Northern California. When I'm in a remote area I always have to stay at Choice-like hotels (not enough power outlets, room too dark, Hilton-kind of internet speed) but at least they will have hard boiled eggs, fruit and cereals for breakfast. I wouldn't mind if this would be a Hilton Family property, where you would at least get stay-credit, have a decent number of power outlets plus a desk without sharp edges and get the familiar ridiculously poor Hilton internet speed.

Another reason why I don't fully agree: half of Hilton's 4000 properties are Hamptons and not a single one of these are owned by Hilton. They're all franchise. Why wouldn't Hilton be able to franchise a brand below Hampton Inn?
Sisosig is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2015, 2:48 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Programs: DL Diamond, HHonors Diamond, National Executive Elite
Posts: 2,363
Originally Posted by lincolnjkc
Maybe it's just me but I thought Home2 was intended to be a "lower than Hampton" brand.
Home2 Suites is an extended-stay, all-suite concept intended to be more affordable than Homewood Suites. Since Hampton doesn't play in the extended stay market, there's little relation between it and Home2.
MS02113 is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2015, 3:32 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Programs: DL Silver, AS MVP, UA Silver, HHonors Diamond, Marriott Plat, SPG Plat, National Exec Elite
Posts: 3,883
If they were willing to as elaborate of a conversion as Hyatt did when they acquired AmeriSuites and turned it into Hyatt Place, I'd love to see them acquire a small player (Drury Inn & Suites) and convert/renovate them as a springboard for the new brand, as opposed to building from scratch. This would GREATLY speed the roll-out if the right acquisition could be made (120 properties in 21 states in the example of Drury).
IsleOfMan is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.