Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Special Interest Travel > GLBT Travelers
Reload this Page >

Same sex immigration - where?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Same sex immigration - where?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2011, 10:01 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,406
Originally Posted by wheresmybagba
I'm not sure that's entirely true. I'd have described my evidence of 12 months as borderline (my partner and I had been living apart for 6 months when I submitted the application!)...yet I submitted my application to London and was approved about 3 days later. Never once at either stage of processing did anyone ask me a question or request any sort of information or clarification...about anything...personally I found that surprising.

I understand your point about mail order brides...but immigration can't offer anything similar to same sex couples because there is no legal union for them to prospectively enter into, not at a federal level anyway! If that changes, I'm sure immigration will catch up...for now, it's about as 'progressive' as it can be.
again... difference between the interdependence visa for an existing Australian citizen and coming as a de facto partner. the interdenncy requirement was always very hard... friends went through that and went down to some place in st kilda where there was a specialised advice group to help out with the applications.

I would think the new de facto thing would be similar... maybe not for applications originating in the USA or uk, but for Asia I'm pretty sure it would be a lot harder than 3 days.
LHR/MEL/Europe FF is offline  
Old Dec 16, 2011, 10:34 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Programs: Flying: VA; Buying: AA, AS, AV, BA, UA!
Posts: 2,349
Talking

Originally Posted by LHR/MEL/Europe FF
again... difference between the interdependence visa for an existing Australian citizen and coming as a de facto partner. the interdenncy requirement was always very hard... friends went through that and went down to some place in st kilda where there was a specialised advice group to help out with the applications.

I would think the new de facto thing would be similar... maybe not for applications originating in the USA or uk, but for Asia I'm pretty sure it would be a lot harder than 3 days.
I think it more depends on if the applicant is possibly eligible for immediate PR based on the length of the relationship. That will take longer as there are more formalities to be undertaken. Where the applicant is clearly required to do the 2 year provisional period the visa grant can be very quick.
wheresmybagba is offline  
Old Dec 19, 2011, 6:14 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 154
There was an article in the New York Times this morning about a program that provides residency if you invest $500,000 in certain economically depressed areas.

Depending on your partner's financial situation this could be a (perhaps quixotic) way of getting to the U.S.
knoebelsPT is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2011, 5:37 am
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,231
Being a US citizen, I haven't had to deal with this of course, but my understanding is that, if you're a working professional, virtually any immigration difficulties can be overcome with the help of a good lawyer. If you are serious about working in the US and bringing your partner with, I'd be shocked if your company didn't have a slew of immigration attorneys to help. If you can get your company to sponsor you for a visa, I'm sure there's a way to get your partner here too.
gfunkdave is offline  
Old Dec 22, 2011, 6:37 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, United Kingdom
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold;BA GGL; hhonors lifetime diamond; Marriott lt Gold; IH Plat Amb; Amex Centurion
Posts: 4,739
Originally Posted by ajax
Indeed.
I have always felt sad that Australia is so far behind the equivalent Commonwealth countries of Canada and the UK. At least it is less discriminatory than it once was
hsmall is offline  
Old Dec 23, 2011, 6:25 am
  #21  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: London, UK
Programs: Not much these days: BA Silver, Bonvoy Lifetime Gold, HH Gold
Posts: 1,326
Well, the discussions have started and I've been very clear about saying I'll consider anywhere as long as my partner can come with me which means (a) right of residency and (b) no prohibition on gay sex. First round suggestions were Istanbul, Dubai or Mumbai. Asked them to go away and think again... As for the US, I did talk to them about it but I'm guessing they have more non-US staff keen to go to the US than the other way around, so they may not be so willing to spend their immigration attorney lawyers on that transaction. Discussions will continue in the new year...
Morland is offline  
Old Dec 25, 2011, 3:33 am
  #22  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PHX
Programs: AA1MM, QF/NZ/VA/UA/DL, etc...
Posts: 516
As a US born expat, I've found NZ very gay-friendly for immigration purposes, and the country provides a good standard of living in a beautiful setting. That being said, prices for many things are higher than in the US or Australia, and the Auckland real estate market is overvalued IMHO. Also salaries tend to be a bit higher in Oz and there are more job opportunities from what I hear.

Feel free to PM me for any questions you may have, and best of luck!

Last edited by RandyNZ; Dec 25, 2011 at 3:34 am Reason: add'l info
RandyNZ is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.