EK 242 YYZ-DXB engine failure, returns to YYZ, 20/7/19
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: DXB
Programs: EK, AA, DL, UA, SPG, HGP, Amex
Posts: 1,208
EK 242 YYZ-DXB engine failure, returns to YYZ, 20/7/19
This one is for the avgeeks. Nothing that exciting other than photos of engine swap at YYZ.
On 20 July 2019, A6-EDO operating EK 242 (YYZ-DXB) reported engine trouble about an hour after take off and turned back to YYZ. Landed with no issues. A6-EOF was sent to pick up the passengers, who departed the next day. A6-EDO is still in Toronto as of July 25.
Engine change on Emirates A380 that suffered engine failure on flight EK242? ? News In Flight
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...6-edo#215dc73f
On 20 July 2019, A6-EDO operating EK 242 (YYZ-DXB) reported engine trouble about an hour after take off and turned back to YYZ. Landed with no issues. A6-EOF was sent to pick up the passengers, who departed the next day. A6-EDO is still in Toronto as of July 25.
Engine change on Emirates A380 that suffered engine failure on flight EK242? ? News In Flight
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/a...6-edo#215dc73f
#2
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 556
Would immigration complications prevent considering a diversion to JFK? Emirates operates three A380 flights per day to JFK, plus many other airlines operate transatlantic flights there. I would think that re-accommodating passengers might have been a bit simpler.
#3
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
Accommodating pax is pretty much the lowest priority in such an emergency
#4
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 556
Either way, I'm not second guessing the decision to return to Toronto. I'm sure they did the right thing under the circumstances. I have no idea what was going on other than what I read. I was just trying to think of possible reasons why they wouldn't land somewhere like JFK with high Emirates traffic. Immigration was one thing that came to mind.
#5
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,801
Agreed. But there were a number of major airports closer than YYZ from where they turned around. YUL, BOS, JFK, and EWR were all closer. It doesn't seem to have been a get-on-the-ground-as-soon-as-possible emergency.
Either way, I'm not second guessing the decision to return to Toronto. I'm sure they did the right thing under the circumstances. I have no idea what was going on other than what I read. I was just trying to think of possible reasons why they wouldn't land somewhere like JFK with high Emirates traffic. Immigration was one thing that came to mind.
Either way, I'm not second guessing the decision to return to Toronto. I'm sure they did the right thing under the circumstances. I have no idea what was going on other than what I read. I was just trying to think of possible reasons why they wouldn't land somewhere like JFK with high Emirates traffic. Immigration was one thing that came to mind.
#6
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 556
I remember years ago reading about a BA 747 that lost an engine sometime after takeoff. I don't remember the precise details, but I believe it departed from the US West Coast. It headed for LHR anyway, but had to stop and refuel somewhere en route because of the extra drag of the dead engine.