Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Emirates | Skywards
Reload this Page >

Two Class A380 - disembarking order

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Two Class A380 - disembarking order

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 1:22 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Programs: Skywards gold
Posts: 14
Two Class A380 - disembarking order

All

I asked this in the newbie forum (long term lurker), but thought I may get some more first hand experience answers via a separate thread.

Im travelling to PVG in Y in a few weeks and wondered if anyone has expiernece of the disembarking order on the 2 class variants? I have only ever been in J on 3 class variant in the past so not sure what to expect (quite surprised to see a 2 class on PVG route!). Basically I want to know if upper deck Y disembark before J? Immigration is a nightmare at PVG so aim is to get off the plane as quickly as possible as per usual in PVG. Currently have 47D selected but if upper deck will get me off quicker then I will change.
Tom Jackson is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 1:33 pm
  #2  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Yes to my knowledge upper deck Y disembark first, before J
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 2:20 pm
  #3  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Skywards silver :-(, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,572
I've been on the two class A380's twice in J.

​​​​​​The Y cabin was disembarked first at least on one trip.

Not sure if Upper deck Y was not used on the second trip as it looked surprisingly clean after a 7 hr trip (could be due to very light loads as well)
ukdoctor is offline  
Old Jan 1, 2017 | 9:18 pm
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,059
It depends.

If load permits, they won't use the rear upper deck Y cabin. This will allow J passsengers to pass through this empty cabin to the door, while upper deck Y passengers in the front cabin are held back.

You should be able to tell which is the case from the seatmap in Manage a Booking.
ft101 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 2:31 am
  #5  
Ambassador: Emirates Airlines
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 19,809
Strangely, on my single 2-class A380 flight, I was first off the upper deck from J.

As soon as the seat belt sign went off, I got my bag and stuff sorted out. I then walked into the Y section - and everyone was still seated! So, I walked to the front and waited for the doors to be opened. People then started standing up in Y.

So - I'm guessing that they may leave the seatbelt sign on in Y (is this possible?) for a while longer.
DYKWIA is online now  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 2:44 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 14
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
So - I'm guessing that they may leave the seatbelt sign on in Y (is this possible?) for a while longer.
And people actually obeyed the sign?
Pocketwatch is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 2:47 am
  #7  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by DYKWIA
Strangely, on my single 2-class A380 flight, I was first off the upper deck from J.

As soon as the seat belt sign went off, I got my bag and stuff sorted out. I then walked into the Y section - and everyone was still seated! So, I walked to the front and waited for the doors to be opened. People then started standing up in Y.

So - I'm guessing that they may leave the seatbelt sign on in Y (is this possible?) for a while longer.
I don't believe that's possible, unless the A380 has such an option. Generally in the cockpit there's just an on/off switch for the entire cabin.
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 3:09 am
  #8  
Moderator, Emirates
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Where My Heart Is
Programs: BAEC Silver, FB Platinum, KQ Asante Gold, Shebamiles Blue, Emirates Blue
Posts: 3,429
I personally think it wasn't one of EK's Design Teams finest moments in the way they have come up with the 2 class A380 configuration. It must pee off quite a few J class pax.

It also seems strange when circumstances allow, that they would keep a whole cabin section empty for (what I interpret) as the sole purpose of the buffer zone to allow J disembarkation first.

S
Saltire74 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 3:12 am
  #9  
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by Saltire74
I personally think it wasn't one of EK's Design Teams finest moments in the way they have come up with the 2 class A380 configuration. It must pee off quite a few J class pax.

It also seems strange when circumstances allow, that they would keep a whole cabin section empty for (what I interpret) as the sole purpose of the buffer zone to allow J disembarkation first.

S
It's not the sole purpose. It makes the workload easier on the crew. It might even require fewer crew to be on-duty, not sure of the legal requirements of closed off sections, if they still count towards the seat to crew ratio.

I think moving J to the forward section would have required way more re-engineering and involved more costs. This also makes the aircraft more flexible as presumably they can decide relatively late in the production how to outfit the aircraft, I think the only consideration there is whether they have the structural reinforcement for the weight of the F class seats.
skywardhunter is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 4:37 am
  #10  
Moderator, Emirates
1M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Where My Heart Is
Programs: BAEC Silver, FB Platinum, KQ Asante Gold, Shebamiles Blue, Emirates Blue
Posts: 3,429
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
It's not the sole purpose. It makes the workload easier on the crew. It might even require fewer crew to be on-duty, not sure of the legal requirements of closed off sections, if they still count towards the seat to crew ratio.

I think moving J to the forward section would have required way more re-engineering and involved more costs. This also makes the aircraft more flexible as presumably they can decide relatively late in the production how to outfit the aircraft, I think the only consideration there is whether they have the structural reinforcement for the weight of the F class seats.
I totally understand that, but it seems like it might have been an afterthought.

Maybe they'll designate that cabin section as Premium Economy if it comes.....

S
Saltire74 is offline  
Old Jan 2, 2017 | 6:25 am
  #11  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,482
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
It's not the sole purpose. It makes the workload easier on the crew.
I think it was to make the workload easier on the EK design specification team No need to redesign a bar in the front galley etc.
eternaltransit is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 6:11 am
  #12  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Manchester, United Kingdom
Programs: Hilton Gold, Priority Club Platinum (until December), FB Explorer, BA Blue, M&M Pleb
Posts: 8,616
Originally Posted by skywardhunter
Yes to my knowledge upper deck Y disembark first, before J
Witnessed them do this at MAN (when flying J). A man in a suit got very uppity with the FAs over that.
Internaut is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 6:42 am
  #13  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: MAN DXB ✈️
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 6,932
Originally Posted by Internaut
Witnessed them do this at MAN (when flying J). A man in a suit got very uppity with the FAs over that.
I've seen many people get "uppity" over small things but I get it in this case - people pay a lot more for j than y and j should disembark first.
m3red is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 7:59 am
  #14  
All eyes on you!
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Programs: Skywards silver :-(, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 2,572
Originally Posted by m3red
I've seen many people get "uppity" over small things but I get it in this case - people pay a lot more for j than y and j should disembark first.
J gets to board first on a 2 class A380 from memory.
ukdoctor is offline  
Old Jan 4, 2017 | 9:18 am
  #15  
Ambassador, Emirates
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: LGW / AMS / CPT
Programs: SA KL BA EK
Posts: 4,847
Originally Posted by m3red
I've seen many people get "uppity" over small things but I get it in this case - people pay a lot more for j than y and j should disembark first.
Is your second username 'aceboy' by any chance?
thijsseh is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.