Community
Wiki Posts
Search

incident yesterday

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 1:11 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,095
incident yesterday

Originally Posted by aravinda
Does anyone have more info on EK213's high speed RTO at DXB last night? Apparently runway was closed due to the landing gear catching fire due to the RTO.

The gear did not catch fire. There was an RTO due to a tire sparating and causing damage to the aircraft. As a result of the heavy braking all main wheels deflated due to the heat and the fire service used water/foam to prevent any fire.
NOIR is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 4:00 am
  #2  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 611
Emirates Boeing 777-200, flight EK-213 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Houston,TX (USA), rejected takeoff from Dubai at high speed after at least one nose gear tyre burst. The airplane came to a stop about 2000 feet short of the runway end with both nose gear tyres burst, responding emergency services needed to cool down the overheated and smoking brakes.

The runway was closed until the aircraft could be towed off the runway.

The Boeing 777-200 registration A6-EWF resumed the flight departing Dubai with a delay of 8 hours.
malct is online now  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 4:06 am
  #3  
Xlr
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA
Programs: Amex Platinum, Chase Sapphire Reserve
Posts: 834
Couldn't find anything on Pprune about this.
Xlr is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 6:11 am
  #4  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: OSL
Programs: QR Plat | SK Diamond | A3 Gold
Posts: 4,612
How long is the runway closed in such a situation and what happens to incoming traffic? DXB has 2 runways, right? So I guess it just slows things down.
ung1 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 11:55 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 10,051
Originally Posted by malct
Emirates Boeing 777-200, flight EK-213 from Dubai (United Arab Emirates) to Houston,TX (USA), rejected takeoff from Dubai at high speed after at least one nose gear tyre burst. The airplane came to a stop about 2000 feet short of the runway end with both nose gear tyres burst, responding emergency services needed to cool down the overheated and smoking brakes.

The runway was closed until the aircraft could be towed off the runway.

The Boeing 777-200 registration A6-EWF resumed the flight departing Dubai with a delay of 8 hours.
acknowledgement:

http://avherald.com/h?article=43dd5ee3&opt=0
ft101 is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 9:36 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: LCY, LGW, LHR
Programs: QR
Posts: 160
Why did the tyres burst? Due to overheating or the harsh breaking?

Its only june in Dubai, and guess tyres should take much more heat! Unless the tyres were not in a good shape?
usud is offline  
Old Jun 9, 2011 | 11:28 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,095
I could imagine the pax freaking out during the RTA, and hard braking. DXB's extended runways came in very handy in this circumstance, an investment that is worth every penny. If this happened a few years ago while the runways where much shorter who know what could of happened. The pilot would have no choice but to take the plane off the ground, and worry later of how to land the aircraft with blown tires.

The aircraft most of been very close to its maximum take off weight. I wonder what the load factor was on the flight ?

I'm sure the smoke from the nose gear also made the situation tense, not to mention when all the fire trucks arrived.

The plane's brakes, and tires where most likely replaced since the aircraft took off eight hours later. I'm sure they will pay extra attention to this on all their other aircraft from now on.
NOIR is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2011 | 8:32 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Programs: BA Gold, FB Petroleum Club, HH Gold, A-Club Platinum
Posts: 1,760
Hi all,

For those that had questions about the heat on the brakes here is a nice video from Boeing with the RTO tests on the new 747-8

http://boeing.com/videos/video.html

I couldn't get the link for the exact video, click on the one with the title
747-8 performs rejected takeoff
potakas is offline  
Old Jun 14, 2011 | 10:06 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Preston
Programs: Skywards Silver, Miles & Bonus Gold, BD Diamond Blue
Posts: 176
Originally Posted by NOIR
I could imagine the pax freaking out during the RTA, and hard braking. DXB's extended runways came in very handy in this circumstance, an investment that is worth every penny. If this happened a few years ago while the runways where much shorter who know what could of happened. The pilot would have no choice but to take the plane off the ground, and worry later of how to land the aircraft with blown tires.

The aircraft most of been very close to its maximum take off weight. I wonder what the load factor was on the flight ?

I'm sure the smoke from the nose gear also made the situation tense, not to mention when all the fire trucks arrived.

The plane's brakes, and tires where most likely replaced since the aircraft took off eight hours later. I'm sure they will pay extra attention to this on all their other aircraft from now on.
The tyres are designed to deflate in the event of overheating of brakes beyond a certain temperature, such as during a RTO. This is to prevent them from experiencing an uncontrolled puncture/explosion which may throw debris up and cause damage to the aircraft.

I doubt they are any maintenence issues involved here.

Last edited by eightblack; Jun 14, 2011 at 10:42 pm Reason: Tyres versus Tires. There's no right or wrong.
vieri_c is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.