certified organic - do you pay up?
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,688
Not out of broccoli. They can be washed out of most greens but my last head of organic romaine lettuce was crawling with what looked like thousands of small insects. I'd rather just buy the non-organic at that point.
#33

Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, TX -- AA Life Platinum; QF Life Silver; UA Silver
Posts: 5,467
at least once a year, there is a new study reaffirming that organic food has no greater nutritional content than conventional. but honestly, these studies are akin to studies confirming there are no apples in oranges. the primary value in eating organic is avoiding pesticides and other chemicals.
sure, there are some people who insist that organic food is more nutritious. but then again, there are people who believe obama was born in kenya, that intelligent design is a valid theory, or that humans don't cause global warming.
sure, there are some people who insist that organic food is more nutritious. but then again, there are people who believe obama was born in kenya, that intelligent design is a valid theory, or that humans don't cause global warming.
#34
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
For me its knowing that I can avoid pesticides etc. Also down here if you shop seasonal and organic you can feed 1 person veggies and fruit and milk for a week for about 20 aussie dollars. Which is great as I HATE buying pre packaged stuff and ending up throwing half of it out because I dont eat it before it goes frot.
#35
Senior Moderator; Moderator, Flyertalk Cares




Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fulltime travel/mostly Europe
Programs: UA 1.7 MM;; Accor & Marriott Pt; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 17,927
There seems to be some misconceptions about what 'organic' is and isn't (it's not all about taste, for instance), and certainly the industry has helped with the confusion.
Here's an example of the difference between organic/non-organic beef. I've chopped it down a bit from a Time story (link below).
The Tale of Two Cattle
ORGANIC (1% of all cattle)
Diet: Grass
That's the normal diet for cattle. Their rumen, a digestive organ, can break down grasses we'd find inedible
Supplements: None
No drugs, no hormones, no additives. That's not ironclad for organic beef some companies might use antimicrobials but generally the animals are supplement-free
Environmental Impact: Living with the Land
Cattle move around the land, ensuring that the grass has time to recover between feedings. Grass doesn't need chemical fertilizer to grow and its presence helps prevent soil erosion. There's no need to clean up manure with low cattle density, the waste just fertilizes the land
Human Impact: The Omega Effect
According to research from the University of California, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids than conventional beef
CONVENTIONAL (99% of all cattle)
The vast majority of all American cattle start off on open ranges, ...and are shifted after a few months to the tight quarters of an industrial feedlot, to be fattened up ...
Diet: Grass and corn
...at the feedlot, they're switched to a heavily corn-based diet, which makes them gain weight faster but also makes them get sick more easily
Supplements: Chemicals
In part to help them survive the crowded conditions of feedlots, where infections can spread fast, conventional cattle are given antibiotics in their feed, and sometimes growth hormones, bloods and fats
Environmental Impact: Waste
A 1,000-head feedlot produces up to 280 tons of manure a week ... All that feed corn requires millions of tons of fertilizer and, ultimately, a lot of petroleum
Human Impact: Fat Attack
Feeding corn to cattle ... doesn't just get them fatter faster; it also changes the quality of the beef. Corn ... can result in beef that is higher in fat helping to fuel the obesity epidemic
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...7458-1,00.html
Here's an example of the difference between organic/non-organic beef. I've chopped it down a bit from a Time story (link below).
The Tale of Two Cattle
ORGANIC (1% of all cattle)
Diet: Grass
That's the normal diet for cattle. Their rumen, a digestive organ, can break down grasses we'd find inedible
Supplements: None
No drugs, no hormones, no additives. That's not ironclad for organic beef some companies might use antimicrobials but generally the animals are supplement-free
Environmental Impact: Living with the Land
Cattle move around the land, ensuring that the grass has time to recover between feedings. Grass doesn't need chemical fertilizer to grow and its presence helps prevent soil erosion. There's no need to clean up manure with low cattle density, the waste just fertilizes the land
Human Impact: The Omega Effect
According to research from the University of California, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids than conventional beef
CONVENTIONAL (99% of all cattle)
The vast majority of all American cattle start off on open ranges, ...and are shifted after a few months to the tight quarters of an industrial feedlot, to be fattened up ...
Diet: Grass and corn
...at the feedlot, they're switched to a heavily corn-based diet, which makes them gain weight faster but also makes them get sick more easily
Supplements: Chemicals
In part to help them survive the crowded conditions of feedlots, where infections can spread fast, conventional cattle are given antibiotics in their feed, and sometimes growth hormones, bloods and fats
Environmental Impact: Waste
A 1,000-head feedlot produces up to 280 tons of manure a week ... All that feed corn requires millions of tons of fertilizer and, ultimately, a lot of petroleum
Human Impact: Fat Attack
Feeding corn to cattle ... doesn't just get them fatter faster; it also changes the quality of the beef. Corn ... can result in beef that is higher in fat helping to fuel the obesity epidemic
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...7458-1,00.html
#37
Original Poster
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,206
Lettuce is not hard to wash properly.... use a small amount of Bleach is a large container of water and after a few minutes all the bugs will go away.... rinse the lettuce in fresh water again (twice) and you will have amazing and organic lettuce..... its well worth it.
#38
Original Poster
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,206
There seems to be some misconceptions about what 'organic' is and isn't (it's not all about taste, for instance), and certainly the industry has helped with the confusion.
Here's an example of the difference between organic/non-organic beef. I've chopped it down a bit from a Time story (link below).
The Tale of Two Cattle
ORGANIC (1% of all cattle)
Diet: Grass
That's the normal diet for cattle. Their rumen, a digestive organ, can break down grasses we'd find inedible
Supplements: None
No drugs, no hormones, no additives. That's not ironclad for organic beef some companies might use antimicrobials but generally the animals are supplement-free
Environmental Impact: Living with the Land
Cattle move around the land, ensuring that the grass has time to recover between feedings. Grass doesn't need chemical fertilizer to grow and its presence helps prevent soil erosion. There's no need to clean up manure with low cattle density, the waste just fertilizes the land
Human Impact: The Omega Effect
According to research from the University of California, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids than conventional beef
CONVENTIONAL (99% of all cattle)
The vast majority of all American cattle start off on open ranges, ...and are shifted after a few months to the tight quarters of an industrial feedlot, to be fattened up ...
Diet: Grass and corn
...at the feedlot, they're switched to a heavily corn-based diet, which makes them gain weight faster but also makes them get sick more easily
Supplements: Chemicals
In part to help them survive the crowded conditions of feedlots, where infections can spread fast, conventional cattle are given antibiotics in their feed, and sometimes growth hormones, bloods and fats
Environmental Impact: Waste
A 1,000-head feedlot produces up to 280 tons of manure a week ... All that feed corn requires millions of tons of fertilizer and, ultimately, a lot of petroleum
Human Impact: Fat Attack
Feeding corn to cattle ... doesn't just get them fatter faster; it also changes the quality of the beef. Corn ... can result in beef that is higher in fat helping to fuel the obesity epidemic
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...7458-1,00.html
Here's an example of the difference between organic/non-organic beef. I've chopped it down a bit from a Time story (link below).
The Tale of Two Cattle
ORGANIC (1% of all cattle)
Diet: Grass
That's the normal diet for cattle. Their rumen, a digestive organ, can break down grasses we'd find inedible
Supplements: None
No drugs, no hormones, no additives. That's not ironclad for organic beef some companies might use antimicrobials but generally the animals are supplement-free
Environmental Impact: Living with the Land
Cattle move around the land, ensuring that the grass has time to recover between feedings. Grass doesn't need chemical fertilizer to grow and its presence helps prevent soil erosion. There's no need to clean up manure with low cattle density, the waste just fertilizes the land
Human Impact: The Omega Effect
According to research from the University of California, grass-fed beef is higher in beta-carotene, vitamin E and omega-3 fatty acids than conventional beef
CONVENTIONAL (99% of all cattle)
The vast majority of all American cattle start off on open ranges, ...and are shifted after a few months to the tight quarters of an industrial feedlot, to be fattened up ...
Diet: Grass and corn
...at the feedlot, they're switched to a heavily corn-based diet, which makes them gain weight faster but also makes them get sick more easily
Supplements: Chemicals
In part to help them survive the crowded conditions of feedlots, where infections can spread fast, conventional cattle are given antibiotics in their feed, and sometimes growth hormones, bloods and fats
Environmental Impact: Waste
A 1,000-head feedlot produces up to 280 tons of manure a week ... All that feed corn requires millions of tons of fertilizer and, ultimately, a lot of petroleum
Human Impact: Fat Attack
Feeding corn to cattle ... doesn't just get them fatter faster; it also changes the quality of the beef. Corn ... can result in beef that is higher in fat helping to fuel the obesity epidemic
http://www.time.com/time/health/arti...7458-1,00.html
#39




Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Programs: United 1K (after 15 years GS) 3MM, Marriott LTTitanium
Posts: 560
#40
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NYC (formerly BOS/DCA)
Programs: UA 1K, IC RA
Posts: 60,745
Having mostly corn/grain fed beef up here, I find that grass-fed is distinct. Not necessarily better or worse, but different. Sometimes I like a nice fatty piece of corn-fed beef, and sometimes I like a leaner grass-fed cut.
Your thoughts?
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Gaucho, being a gaucho and all, what are your thoughts on the taste of corn fed beef? Does it have a distinct flavor for you?
Having mostly corn/grain fed beef up here, I find that grass-fed is distinct. Not necessarily better or worse, but different. Sometimes I like a nice fatty piece of corn-fed beef, and sometimes I like a leaner grass-fed cut.
Your thoughts?
Having mostly corn/grain fed beef up here, I find that grass-fed is distinct. Not necessarily better or worse, but different. Sometimes I like a nice fatty piece of corn-fed beef, and sometimes I like a leaner grass-fed cut.
Your thoughts?
#42
Moderator: Luxury Hotels and FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Palo Alto, California,USA
Posts: 18,252
For me its knowing that I can avoid pesticides etc. Also down here if you shop seasonal and organic you can feed 1 person veggies and fruit and milk for a week for about 20 aussie dollars. Which is great as I HATE buying pre packaged stuff and ending up throwing half of it out because I dont eat it before it goes frot.
Time for me to stop commenting, as to continue would probably verge this thread over to Omni-land.
#43
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,688
Lettuce is not hard to wash properly.... use a small amount of Bleach is a large container of water and after a few minutes all the bugs will go away.... rinse the lettuce in fresh water again (twice) and you will have amazing and organic lettuce..... its well worth it.
#44
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
Indeed, you avoid pesticides. You get rat droppings and bugs (live or dead) instead. And I suspect the key word in your money-saving argument is "seasonal" rather than "organic."
Time for me to stop commenting, as to continue would probably verge this thread over to Omni-land.
Time for me to stop commenting, as to continue would probably verge this thread over to Omni-land.
#45
Original Poster
Moderator, Argentina and FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: MIA / EZE
Programs: Lord of Malbec & all Wines Argentine. AA EXP / Marriott Lifetime Gold / Hyatt Explorist / Hertz PC
Posts: 36,206
Wirelessly posted (Nokia N97 / Palm TX: Mozilla/5.0 (SymbianOS/9.4; Series60/5.0 NokiaN97-3/10.2.012; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1; en-us) AppleWebKit/525 (KHTML, like Gecko) WicKed/7.1.12344)
the animal dropping argument is just so funny...
the animal dropping argument is just so funny...



