![]() |
They're springing up all over the place around me in NJ. The burgers are very good, and much better than Mickey D's. I'm so-so about the fries. But I am concerned about the fat content - that juiciness has to come from somewhere :)
We have a local ice cream parlor that has a small restaurant in the back, and everything is cooked to order AND the oil is at the proper temp to keep the fries from absorbing too much of it. The burger is not juicy (fatty) but it's still very good and freshly prepared. If you can believe it, I tried In and Out in Vegas and walked away totally unimpressed. Five Guys is far better. Still I enjoyed it so much that I'm now going to ration it because of it's juiciness :D |
So how does it compare to Shake shack? The best burger I ever had was at Shake shack in Madison Square Park a sunny November afternoon.
|
Originally Posted by SocialAdept
(Post 14508089)
So how does it compare to Shake shack? The best burger I ever had was at Shake shack in Madison Square Park a sunny November afternoon.
Honestly, I was mildly underwhelmed by Shake Shack. Its attraction seems to be that it's a good, down-home burger joint--something you'd see in a small town in the Midwest, maybe--right in the middle of the urban canyon of Manhattan. But honestly, it's not any more special than a typical down-home burger joint you'd run into in a small town in the Midwest--good, but not mind-blowingly awesome. I actually thought the burger at Five Guys was better than that at Shake Shack, but the ambiance couldn't compare, of course. Shake Shack has the Danny Meyer name and the park-bench atomosphere going for it, but it's otherwise unimpressive (and IMHO not worth the wait, except for maybe the first time for the novelty). |
Originally Posted by FLLDL
(Post 14504567)
Five guys seems to be opening up new stores left and right. Wonder if they will be the Boston Chicken / Krispy Kreme of the 2010s?
|
Originally Posted by mjcewl1284
(Post 14508746)
The same was said about Starbucks and look at where they're at.
Starbucks has a lucrative niche and for years they went basically unchallenged in the marketplace in most regions. 5 guys is entering an already crowded market and seem to have minimal advantage over the other players. Competitors down market can offer a better value proposition, while competitors upmarket have additional revenue channels to exploit. Competition is a good thing, but will be interesting to see how it plays out for them, particular once the novelty/buzz of new locations wears off. |
I exaggerated somewhat, I should have said that I had my best VALUE burger ever at Shake Shack. To take the top spot I would rather recommend the deluxe burger at Minetta Tavern (NYC). It’s the Rolls-Royce of burgers. At $26 however it’s not something you’d swing by to grab for lunch.
|
Originally Posted by jackal
(Post 14508197)
......(snippagio)....Honestly, I was mildly underwhelmed by Shake Shack. Its attraction seems to be that it's a good, down-home burger joint--something you'd see in a small town in the Midwest, maybe--right in the middle of the urban canyon of Manhattan. But honestly, it's not any more special than a typical down-home burger joint you'd run into in a small town in the Midwest--good, but not mind-blowingly awesome.
I see nothing "wrong" with 5 Guys (except meat lacking in flavor at all 3 of the locations I've visited), but would hardly vote to raise the chain to basilica status amont the sacred temples of burgerdom. In defense, however, of 5 Guys and In & Out, I appreciate the attempt to recreate and preserve the classic and traditional hamburger, a culinary marvel which needs little tinkering. |
Originally Posted by Mary2e
(Post 14504739)
They're springing up all over the place around me in NJ. The burgers are very good, and much better than Mickey D's. I'm so-so about the fries. But I am concerned about the fat content - that juiciness has to come from somewhere :)
We have a local ice cream parlor that has a small restaurant in the back, and everything is cooked to order AND the oil is at the proper temp to keep the fries from absorbing too much of it. The burger is not juicy (fatty) but it's still very good and freshly prepared. If you can believe it, I tried In and Out in Vegas and walked away totally unimpressed. Five Guys is far better. |
Like others who've posted, I'm not sure what I'm missing?
I've eaten at 5-Guys 4 or 5 times, and after each meal I wondered 'so what's the big deal'? The last time, they didn't even have brown mustard, which is what I prefer on my burger. I no longer waste my $ on this place. IMO, overated :td: |
Burger is ok but I really love their dogs.
|
On my last 2 visits (DC and PA)the french fries were limp and the cheeseburgers were greasy. I think their overall quality control has dropped. On a positive note the peanuts were as yummy as ever.
MisterNice |
Originally Posted by SocialAdept
(Post 14509116)
I exaggerated somewhat, I should have said that I had my best VALUE burger ever at Shake Shack. To take the top spot I would rather recommend the deluxe burger at Minetta Tavern (NYC). It’s the Rolls-Royce of burgers. At $26 however it’s not something you’d swing by to grab for lunch.
|
I love Five Guys...gives me something to munch on when I'm dreaming of Kobe or In-N-Out....mmmmmm......In-N-Out
my MR can't get here soon enough |
Originally Posted by El_Chiflero
(Post 14546032)
I love Five Guys...gives me something to munch on when I'm dreaming of Kobe or In-N-Out....mmmmmm......In-N-Out
|
Give me fuddruckers, you can have your welldone five guys :D
since I am in a town with both now, I can freely pick. Fuddruckers let's me have a wheat bun that doesn't get soggy in 5 min or less as well. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 9:48 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.