![]() |
Originally Posted by PTravel
(Post 10446121)
... but do let me know what part of a chicken is a "nugget."
"The ingredients listed in the flyer suggest a lot of thought goes into a nugget, that and a lot of corn. Of the thirty-eight ingredients it takes to make a McNugget, I counted thirteen that can be derived from corn: the corn-fed chicken itself; modified cornstarch (to bind the pulverized chicken meat); mono-, tri-, and diglycerides (emulsifiers, which keep the fats and water from separating); dextrose; lecithin (another emulsifier); chicken broth (to restore some of the flavor that processing leeches out); yellow corn flour and more modified cornstarch (for the batter); cornstarch (a filler); vegetable shortening; partially hydrogenated corn oil; and citric acid as a preservative. A couple of other plants take part in the nugget: There's some wheat in the batter, and on any given day the hydrogenated oil could come from soybeans, canola, or cotton rather than corn, depending on the market price and availability. According to the handout, McNuggets also contain several completely synthetic ingredients, quasiedible substances that ultimately come not from a corn or soybean field but form a petroleum refinery or chemical plant. These chemicals are what make modern processed food possible, by keeping the organic materials in them from going bad or looking strange after months in the freezer or on the road. Listed first are the "leavening agents": sodium aluminum phosphate, mono-calcium phosphate, sodium acid pyrophosphate, and calcium lactate. These are antioxidants added to keep the various animal and vegetable fats involved in a nugget from turning rancid. Then there are "anti-foaming agents" like dimethylpolysiloxene, added to the cooking oil to keep the starches from binding to air molecules, so as to produce foam during the fry. The problem is evidently grave enough to warrant adding a toxic chemical to the food: According to the Handbook of Food Additives, dimethylpolysiloxene is a suspected carcinogen and an established mutagen, tumorigen, and reproductive effector; it's also flammable. But perhaps the most alarming ingredient in a Chicken McNugget is tertiary butylhydroquinone, or TBHQ, an antioxidant derived from petroleum that is either sprayed directly on the nugget or the inside of the box it comes in to "help preserve freshness." According to A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives, TBHQ is a form of butane (i.e. lighter fluid) the FDA allows processors to use sparingly in our food: It can comprise no more than 0.02 percent of the oil in a nugget. Which is probably just as well, considering that ingesting a single gram of TBHQ can cause "nausea, vomiting, ringing in the ears, delirium, a sense of suffocation, and collapse." Ingesting five grams of TBHQ can kill." |
McGriddles... mmmmmmmmmm
And some of the premium chicken sandwiches are okay. But besides that, McDonalds is pretty inedible. |
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 10445715)
Hi all,
Do you know McDonalds is not good for us at all... |
Originally Posted by PTravel
(Post 10446121)
I don't know what is in a "McRib," but do let me know what part of a chicken is a "nugget.".
Maccas is a good emergency food when you're on the road and just want something you don't have to think about when you order. |
Is there really much difference nutritionally between a McDonalds burger and an equivalently sized In-n-Out burger?
|
Originally Posted by swag
(Post 10446440)
Is there really much difference nutritionally between a McDonalds burger and an equivalently sized In-n-Out burger?
--- I can eat a McRib any time, any place. Thankfully, they almost never have them around here, so I don't ever go to Mickey D's. EVER. (Although, when on the road, I'll occasionally have brekkie there. I don't feel like it's as bad...) |
Originally Posted by swag
(Post 10446440)
Is there really much difference nutritionally between a McDonalds burger and an equivalently sized In-n-Out burger?
|
Originally Posted by mjcewl1284
(Post 10446177)
McGriddles... mmmmmmmmmm
I don't care much about their burgers, as I would rather have a Avocado Bacon Cheeseburger from Carl's JR :o And for breakfast, Jack in the Box's Sirloin Steak breakfast burrito is awesome ^ |
Originally Posted by N830MH
(Post 10445715)
So if you try to give me more information for which good restaurant or fast-food. Thanks, Guys! :)
|
Originally Posted by LapLap
(Post 10447099)
Just to highlight this part of N830MH's query (it seems to have got missed). The OP is aware of Islands Restaurant and In & Out but was wondering if anyone had suggestions/information on other, healthier alternatives to MuckyD's in the Phoenix AZ area. (I'm also curious, even though I live nowhere near!)
|
Originally Posted by notsosmart
(Post 10447197)
When in the southwest, I eat almost exclusively mexican from road-side vendors. ...relatively healthy...
|
So Mickie D's is not healthy...Shocker!
Can you say XXL, clogged arteries, and zits oh my. Fast food other than tacoshops is horrible! |
The key is to remember that fast food, like any other thing that is bad for you, should be taken in moderation.
|
I like McDonalds.
|
The main reason I no longer eat at McDonalds (except Salads):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6us9kHHSNwk I have no idea what kind of chemicals are necessary to create those results, but they can't be very healthy... :eek: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:19 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.