![]() |
Originally Posted by TWA884
(Post 24689654)
Pretty good article in Gentleman's Gazette:
|
the dalmore brand guy is/was very entertaining, saw videos of him doing tastings
|
Had some Glenmorangie 18-yo last week.
It was fine, but no single characteristic that made me want to have more of it. I'll stick with Highland Park for my regular quaff. |
Interesting piece in today's WSJ on "no-age" single malts (paywall site):
http://www.wsj.com/articles/6-no-age...ver-1429901298 IN SCOTCH AISLES across the country, a reformation is quietly under way. Among the stolid contingent of age-emblazoned single-malts—the Glenlivet 12, the Macallan 15, Talisker 18—a mysterious new crowd is creeping in, and their labels are defiantly numeral-free... |
Boraxo, thank you for the link to the article. Interesting reading, although I was not in agreement with all of it.
Much easier to remember that I like the 16 year Lagavullin and the 10 year Laphroaig than having to memorize some silly new names |
Originally Posted by Boraxo
(Post 24716738)
Interesting piece in today's WSJ on "no-age" single malts (paywall site):
http://www.wsj.com/articles/6-no-age...ver-1429901298 IN SCOTCH AISLES across the country, a reformation is quietly under way. Among the stolid contingent of age-emblazoned single-malts—the Glenlivet 12, the Macallan 15, Talisker 18—a mysterious new crowd is creeping in, and their labels are defiantly numeral-free... |
Originally Posted by zitsky
(Post 24718899)
I wonder if anyone here has tried the Macallan 1824 Series? I am curious how it compares to Macallan 12. I imagine I'll find it in duty free shops next time I travel overseas in September?
|
Originally Posted by Kettering Northants QC
(Post 24719058)
yes, I picked up a bottle of the Oak Select on a cruise ship in the Med last summer (Celebrity Eclipse). It was a good price but it's not one of my favourites
|
Originally Posted by zitsky
(Post 24719083)
More, please! What scotch do you normally drink? How much did you pay for it? Thanks.
Islay Malts, Talisker are my favourites. Anything from supermarket own brand up to a Port Ellen that my wife brought for me a few years ago for about £90 and would now retail at significantly more! Usually £25-£45 a bottle can get you excellent stuff. But also content with cheaper stuff like Chivas Regal, Famous Grouse when the mood takes me. Just wasn't bowled over by The 1824 and wouldn't buy it again. |
Originally Posted by Boraxo
(Post 24716738)
Interesting piece in today's WSJ on "no-age" single malts (paywall site):
http://www.wsj.com/articles/6-no-age...ver-1429901298 IN SCOTCH AISLES across the country, a reformation is quietly under way. Among the stolid contingent of age-emblazoned single-malts—the Glenlivet 12, the Macallan 15, Talisker 18—a mysterious new crowd is creeping in, and their labels are defiantly numeral-free... |
Originally Posted by broadwayblue
(Post 24719907)
Simply put, it's a way to charge more for younger whiskey. Time will tell how successful they are. Personally, I won't be purchasing a Talisker Storm any time soon, particularly when it's more expensive and not as good as the standard 10 yo.
|
Originally Posted by broadwayblue
(Post 24719907)
Simply put, it's a way to charge more for younger whiskey.
|
Originally Posted by Kettering Northants QC
(Post 24720489)
Talisker Storm is actually very good IMO, much closer to a peaty Islay Malt than regular Talisker
|
Originally Posted by Kagehitokiri
(Post 24720683)
and already charging a lot more for older whiskey
|
Originally Posted by broadwayblue
(Post 24721417)
Interesting...I had read quite a few not so great reviews. Had heard decent things about Dark Storm. But again, it's only through the power of marketing that they can get away with charging more for these NAS bottlings.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:38 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.