Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > DiningBuzz
Reload this Page >

Important Court Case May Define Limits of Free Grocery Store Samples

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Important Court Case May Define Limits of Free Grocery Store Samples

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 9:09 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
3M
Conversation Starter
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Over the Bay Bridge, CA
Programs: Jumbo mas
Posts: 42,599
Important Court Case May Define Limits of Free Grocery Store Samples

http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2013/0...cub-foods.html

A 68-year-old Gem Lake, Minnesota, retiree who alleges he was "jumped, kicked and beaten" by police officers and store security after he walked off with 1.4 pounds of summer sausage and beef sticks that had been set out as free samples might not actually become the poster boy for pitfalls of supermarket courtesy culture, but he should be. Here's what happened.
Eastbay1K is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 9:18 pm
  #2  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
Originally Posted by Eastbay1K
http://newyork.grubstreet.com/2013/0...cub-foods.html

A 68-year-old Gem Lake, Minnesota, retiree who alleges he was "jumped, kicked and beaten" by police officers and store security after he walked off with 1.4 pounds of summer sausage and beef sticks that had been set out as free samples might not actually become the poster boy for pitfalls of supermarket courtesy culture, but he should be. Here's what happened.
Indeed.

But really, if limits for free samples are never explicitly set, and there's no one around to say how many is enough, how can a customer be confronted about taking too many?
A question for the philosophers, but in the meantime the lawyers will offer up profitable arguments.
Fredd is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 10:08 am
  #3  
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 359
The only place I've seen food samples offered are in places like Costco and Sam's Club we're there is always an attendant watching/preparing them. How sanitary can this be? Food left out and no one watching? Not only would I not take any, I wouldn't even try any for fear that's some crazy has sneezed all over them, pawed through them, or otherwise contaminated them.
azcoyote is offline  
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 10:18 am
  #4  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
Originally Posted by azcoyote
The only place I've seen food samples offered are in places like Costco and Sam's Club we're there is always an attendant watching/preparing them. How sanitary can this be? Food left out and no one watching? Not only would I not take any, I wouldn't even try any for fear that's some crazy has sneezed all over them, pawed through them, or otherwise contaminated them.
I could write the same about the cretins in hotel lounges who ignore the tongs or other implements, pick up food in their bare hands, and sometimes even pop it into their mouths.

I observed that most recently in a Hilton Lounge in Germany. The older woman doing it happened to be French - her companion muttered something to her when she caught me glaring at her - but ignorance transcends nationalities and I've seen this disgusting behavior carried out by a variety of customers way too many times in lounges for me to think it's a rare occurrence.

I've also seen it at restaurant buffets and it offends me just as much.
Fredd is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 11:00 pm
  #5  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend, Moderator, Information Desk, Ambassador, Alaska Airlines
1M
Community Builder
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: FAI
Programs: AS MVP Gold100K, AS 1MM, Maika`i Card, AGR, Hertz PC, Marriott Lifetime Plat, CO, 7H, BA, 8E
Posts: 44,372
Wow.

Never thought of filling plastic bags with 'samples'
beckoa is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2013 | 11:13 pm
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
yeah, ive kind of gotten away from any unattended buffet-style
Kagehitokiri is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 9:49 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
Originally Posted by Fredd
I could write the same about the cretins in hotel lounges who ignore the tongs or other implements, pick up food in their bare hands, and sometimes even pop it into their mouths.

I observed that most recently in a Hilton Lounge in Germany. The older woman doing it happened to be French - her companion muttered something to her when she caught me glaring at her - but ignorance transcends nationalities and I've seen this disgusting behavior carried out by a variety of customers way too many times in lounges for me to think it's a rare occurrence.

I've also seen it at restaurant buffets and it offends me just as much.
I must disagree with you. If a person is careful to touch only the piece of food they are consuming, I think that using your hands is far more sanitary than everyone touching the same pair of germ-infested tongs.

I would never use my hands to 'scoop' anything up, where I might contact other food. But I find it much easier and more practical to pick up a croissant or pastry with my fingers rather than attempting to crush it between the typical too-small pair of tongs provided at a buffet in order to transfer it to my plate.

If you were really concerned about the cleanliness of the food, the correct thing to do would be to summon a manager and tell them what you saw and how you feel it contaminated the food and ask them to remove or replace it. Alternatively, explain to the woman how she was contaminating the food. What good does glaring malevolently at the woman do?

As far as grocery store samples, I often wonder if the container of toothpicks is dirtier than anything else. It is nearly impossible in some cases to avoid touching other toothpicks when you are trying to pick up your own toothpick.

Maybe BYOB (bring your own bag) is really the way to go!
janetdoe is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2013 | 10:26 am
  #8  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
Originally Posted by janetdoe
I must disagree with you. If a person is careful to touch only the piece of food they are consuming, I think that using your hands is far more sanitary than everyone touching the same pair of germ-infested tongs.
That "If" is so big you could shove a couple of germ-infected hands through it. Your point seems to be that your hands and your co-ordination should be good enough for me.

I would never use my hands to 'scoop' anything up, where I might contact other food. But I find it much easier and more practical to pick up a croissant or pastry with my fingers rather than attempting to crush it between the typical too-small pair of tongs provided at a buffet in order to transfer it to my plate.
Yet this particular individual was picking up nuts and potato chips, for example. Perhaps she's a surgeon, a concert pianist, or otherwise gifted with near-miraculous hand co-ordination. How otherwise could one pick up peanuts out of a bowl without leaving a few little germs behind?

If you were really concerned about the cleanliness of the food, the correct thing to do would be to summon a manager and tell them what you saw and how you feel it contaminated the food and ask them to remove or replace it. Alternatively, explain to the woman how she was contaminating the food. What good does glaring malevolently at the woman do?
Thanks for your attempt to provide instructions in appropriate behavior; however, I don't generally go through life creating confrontations for the sake of, well, providing instructions in appropriate behavior, other than more serious circumstances. If, for example, there was a flu pandemic, I would have quietly spoken to a manager.

As you may know, it's standard procedure on cruise ships for the buffet to be manned by employees and off limits to customers when there's an outbreak of something nasty aboard.

On a more practical level, the lounge would have had to remove everything that was out, because this woman picked her way through every dish.

You infer I was glaring "malevolently." Methinks, given your own insouciant approach to grazing at buffets, that you've been the innocent victim of such malevolence.

Your attitude seems certainly more typical of this era than mine, and I may well be in the minority.
Fredd is offline  
Old May 1, 2013 | 6:54 am
  #9  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: back to my roots in Scotland!
Programs: Tamsin - what else is there to say?
Posts: 47,843
I'm another who eschews tongs if I know I can pick up what I want to eat without touching anyone else's food. I really don't see why this is unhygienic If I don't come into contact with any food but my own, then it's not a problem.

Crisps and peanuts? you either chose to eat those from a communal bowl and accept the associated risks or you don't. But don't think you'll ever get those served both communally and hygienically.
Jenbel is offline  
Old May 1, 2013 | 7:38 am
  #10  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SEA/YVR/BLI
Programs: UA "Lifetime" Gold, AS Titanium, OW Emerald, HH Lifetime Diamond, IC Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 9,583
Biting off more than you can eschew?

Originally Posted by Jenbel
I'm another who eschews tongs if I know I can pick up what I want to eat without touching anyone else's food. I really don't see why this is unhygienic If I don't come into contact with any food but my own, then it's not a problem.

Crisps and peanuts? you either chose to eat those from a communal bowl and accept the associated risks or you don't. But don't think you'll ever get those served both communally and hygienically.
chacun son got.

Originally Posted by azcoyote
The only place I've seen food samples offered are in places like Costco and Sam's Club we're there is always an attendant watching/preparing them. How sanitary can this be? Food left out and no one watching? Not only would I not take any, I wouldn't even try any for fear that's some crazy has sneezed all over them, pawed through them, or otherwise contaminated them.
Agreed. Samples such as cheese and artichoke dip are out in a couple of the nearby supermarkets we visit and I avoid them. I pick up enough germs from our own grandchildren, thanks very much.

Last edited by Fredd; May 1, 2013 at 10:26 am Reason: removing extraneous material - back on topic
Fredd is offline  
Old May 1, 2013 | 10:48 am
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Central Texas
Programs: Many, slipping beneath the horizon
Posts: 9,859
Reading this thread, I was reminded of a local woman, now deceased, but for decades over-active in civic and political affairs. She would show up at every occasion in which free snacks, finger food, or even free meals were available, and stuff 3 days rations into plastic bags in her enormous purse. I know that her income after retirement was modest, but not that modest....

She gave new meaning to the word "Shameless".
TMOliver is offline  
Old May 4, 2013 | 12:59 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Programs: HGP/SPG: Apprentice Kettle; UA/AA/DL: Journeyman Kettle
Posts: 866
But really, if limits for free samples are never explicitly set, and there's no one around to say how many is enough, how can a customer be confronted about taking too many?
It is so sad that this is where were are as a society. I know that the use of words like fair, reasonable and commonsense draw ridicule on this and other boards, but really! Commonsense should dictate how many/much is enough. A sense of fairness should guide one's action. The "reasonable" person measure should be an indicator of appropriate limits.

I am not going to get into an argument over these words with anyone. If you don't know what is reasonable; if you can not fathom what is fair; if commonsense needs to be precisely defined for you, then so be it.

This actually saddens me a little. Just like it saddens me a little that some advertisements explicitly mention that one doesn't get the pictured smartphone in addition to the smartphone case being advertised for USD$35.00!
MIT_SBM is offline  
Old May 6, 2013 | 7:50 am
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: IAD
Posts: 2,060
Originally Posted by TMOliver
Reading this thread, I was reminded of a local woman, now deceased, but for decades over-active in civic and political affairs. She would show up at every occasion in which free snacks, finger food, or even free meals were available, and stuff 3 days rations into plastic bags in her enormous purse. I know that her income after retirement was modest, but not that modest....

She gave new meaning to the word "Shameless".
It's been a couple decades since I worked in retail, but you see that quite alot there. I was reminded of it last Saturday when I worked a fundraising booth for my animal charity at a local pet adoption fair. Like all the other many animal charities, I had a table with stuff for sale. At one point an older lady carrying a shopping bag walked up and asked me something in a thick accent I couldn't quite catch. I asked her to repeat and she said "free stuff?" gesturing at my table. I said no, sorry, this is all for sale. She cheerily thanked me and wandered off again. Her husband followed, carrying two shopping bags. They were just going to all of the fair booths looking for free stuff.
jcwoman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.