F on Embraer 170
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM, UA GOLD, HERTZ #1 GOLD, STRWD PLAT
Posts: 614
F on Embraer 170
Anybody been in first on the Embraer 170? Can you tell me how it was? Too tight?
#2

Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Land of 10,000 Upgrades
Posts: 9,459
Originally Posted by rweintra
Anybody been in first on the Embraer 170?
#3
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: DL, SPG (Gold)
Posts: 2,039
Originally Posted by rweintra
Anybody been in first on the Embraer 170? Can you tell me how it was? Too tight?
Seat pitch is only 36"....whereas the width seems quite acceptable. IMO, they are quite comfortable seats. Heck, IMO even the coach seats on the E170 are better than almost any other coach seat.
If travelling alone, my preferred seat is 2A.....as it's both a window and an aisle.

Otherwise, 2C/D fits the bill.
The other 3 FC seats (row 1) are essentially bulkhead seats.......which I have managed to avoid so far.

I would really like to try FC in the CRJ-900 in order to personally make comparison of the two aircraft.
Has anyone else done that yet?
A.J.
#4
Join Date: Aug 2005
Programs: DL Platinum, Marriott Platinum, Hertz 5*, Hilton Diamond.
Posts: 92
I have sat in F and it was pretty nice, not expecting anyhting great, but a nice surprise. I have also been in coach on this plane and it was surprisingly roomy compared to an MD 88 or 737. Nice airplane!
#5
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CHICAGO
Programs: DELTA SM, HILTON GOLD, SPG GOLD
Posts: 108
I have also been in first and coach on this plane. First is nice, and so is coach. The seats are also very comforable.
#6




Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ATL
Programs: 4MM/DM, Marriott Lifetime PM, Hilton Diamond, SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,370
See this thread: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=600984
#7




Join Date: May 1999
Location: CVG
Programs: DL DM 4MM, Lifetime Marriott Plat Elite, HH Diamond
Posts: 1,435
It is a very nice ride! 2A is probably the best seat, but all FC seats on this equipment are fine. The first row does have a bulkhead in front of it, but it is not bad. The flight is staffed with two FA's which results in fairly good service due to the 2 FA to 69 passengers.
No Video or audio, nor empower on these planes, but they are a HUGE improvement over the Bombardier CRJ 40/50/70 seater. Coach seats are just fine. Shuttle America flying for DL does NOT provide meal service in FC. In chatting with the FA, he said that when they fly that equipment for UA, meal service is provided in FC.
DL has been using this equipment to fly Cmh - Slc which is around a 3+ hour flight. Pleasant, but a meal would be nice.
Overhead bins do fit a full size roll aboard, and headroom for me (6'4") is good, except in the lavatory.
Once you've flown this aircraft, you will quickly understand why Bombardier has announced plans to lay off 1300+ staff due to the downturn in sales of the CRJ 40/50/70 product. It just can't compete.
I will give the CRJ 90 a try, but I've always thought the Embraer product to be more flier friendly.
No Video or audio, nor empower on these planes, but they are a HUGE improvement over the Bombardier CRJ 40/50/70 seater. Coach seats are just fine. Shuttle America flying for DL does NOT provide meal service in FC. In chatting with the FA, he said that when they fly that equipment for UA, meal service is provided in FC.
DL has been using this equipment to fly Cmh - Slc which is around a 3+ hour flight. Pleasant, but a meal would be nice.
Overhead bins do fit a full size roll aboard, and headroom for me (6'4") is good, except in the lavatory.
Once you've flown this aircraft, you will quickly understand why Bombardier has announced plans to lay off 1300+ staff due to the downturn in sales of the CRJ 40/50/70 product. It just can't compete.
I will give the CRJ 90 a try, but I've always thought the Embraer product to be more flier friendly.
#8




Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: DL; AA; UA; LHLX; AFKL; SK; BA; SQ; CX
Posts: 7,767
Originally Posted by DL Platinum
Shuttle America flying for DL does NOT provide meal service in FC. In chatting with the FA, he said that when they fly that equipment for UA, meal service is provided in FC.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, DL PM, UA GOLD, HERTZ #1 GOLD, STRWD PLAT
Posts: 614
OK. So, my initial question was how F on the 170 is. Now, for a more involved question.
Flying LGA-ORD, I have the choice of DL, UA, & AA. I will be flying in F. Which airline should I take? They are all priced the same, and they all have flight times that work for me.
Opinions?
Flying LGA-ORD, I have the choice of DL, UA, & AA. I will be flying in F. Which airline should I take? They are all priced the same, and they all have flight times that work for me.
Opinions?
#10


Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Programs: AA2, DL2, Amtrak2, US2, SPG1, MAR2
Posts: 2,566
Are there differences? Of course. But it is not like choosing UA First vs. SQ First for long-haul. Cold food on DL, hot on UA and I think AA. No IFE on DL or AA, audio (incl. Ch9) on UA, Nicer Marine Air Terminal for DL and CR at ORD while AA & UA have clubs on both ends. Nothing too major in here to really drive a choice.
Go with whichever carrier you are trying to accrue miles on and/or get status on.
Go with whichever carrier you are trying to accrue miles on and/or get status on.

