Please Put Your Window Shade Up
#31
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,957
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by FL-Delta-Platinum:
The point is that in a "survivable" accident, people are getting out NOW. Keeping the window shades up is not a benefit to safety. A serious accident, with survivors, will have whomever is alive throwing open the door.
I have been on a flight where the engines failed just prior to lift off and we aborted. I don't remember the shades being up as adding any significant safety margin. On another occassion, we were the last to land at FLL in a near-monsoon condition. As soon as we landed, water was flying EVERYWHERE as we really landed in a small lake. Window shades up didn't help unless you wanted to see a water show.
Anything than a "very rough landing" (crash) would have the captain directing what would happen, and not require the shades to be up the whole time of final approach.
It is just one more stupid rule, without any real benefit. There are too many stupid rules to airline travel. Most make no sense to the reality of travel and are designed for the never-travelling public to say our politicians are doing something... It's like gun laws - more rules don't make us safer, they're just more rules. It would be political suicide however for someone recinding a "security" rule, as silly as it may be, because that would be viewed as soft on terrorism. More rules just make business harder to get done.</font>
The point is that in a "survivable" accident, people are getting out NOW. Keeping the window shades up is not a benefit to safety. A serious accident, with survivors, will have whomever is alive throwing open the door.
I have been on a flight where the engines failed just prior to lift off and we aborted. I don't remember the shades being up as adding any significant safety margin. On another occassion, we were the last to land at FLL in a near-monsoon condition. As soon as we landed, water was flying EVERYWHERE as we really landed in a small lake. Window shades up didn't help unless you wanted to see a water show.
Anything than a "very rough landing" (crash) would have the captain directing what would happen, and not require the shades to be up the whole time of final approach.
It is just one more stupid rule, without any real benefit. There are too many stupid rules to airline travel. Most make no sense to the reality of travel and are designed for the never-travelling public to say our politicians are doing something... It's like gun laws - more rules don't make us safer, they're just more rules. It would be political suicide however for someone recinding a "security" rule, as silly as it may be, because that would be viewed as soft on terrorism. More rules just make business harder to get done.</font>
#32
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 5,957
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by FL-Delta-Platinum:
I have been on a flight where the engines failed just prior to lift off and we aborted. I don't remember the shades being up as adding any significant safety margin. On another occassion, we were the last to land at FLL in a near-monsoon condition. As soon as we landed, water was flying EVERYWHERE as we really landed in a small lake. Window shades up didn't help unless you wanted to see a water show.
</font>
I have been on a flight where the engines failed just prior to lift off and we aborted. I don't remember the shades being up as adding any significant safety margin. On another occassion, we were the last to land at FLL in a near-monsoon condition. As soon as we landed, water was flying EVERYWHERE as we really landed in a small lake. Window shades up didn't help unless you wanted to see a water show.
</font>
#33
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Niceville, FL, USA
Posts: 2,793
yashan: As I am sure you realize by now, the shades need to be up so that pax like yourself will not SLEEP through a crash landing if they are seated in exit rows.
This is a serious problem, especially on CRJs due to their extremely sleep-inducing seats.
This is a serious problem, especially on CRJs due to their extremely sleep-inducing seats.
#34
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Southern California
Programs: DL: 3.8 MM, Marriott: Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 24,575
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by AS Flyer:
Not everything the FAA and airlines do is to irritate you.</font>
Not everything the FAA and airlines do is to irritate you.</font>
If I am to be convinced that the airlines are doing all they can for my safety, it's going to have to be on an issue other than the position of my window shade.
#35
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: SAN Diego (Hillcrest); formerly LEXington, KY; still like the nym
Programs: DL Platinum; Marriott Lifetime Platinum; married to Hilton Elite
Posts: 3,028
Almost 60,000 people have been killed in auto accidents in the US since 9/11.
That this airline discussion is an issue for anyone shows how woefully inappropriate to the risk involved these concerns are.
What precautions do most of us take to the risks we face? How safer are we if we worry about a plane crash? Do you wear a face mask to avoid SARS? Do you stay out of cars because folks have previously died in them? Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?
That this airline discussion is an issue for anyone shows how woefully inappropriate to the risk involved these concerns are.
What precautions do most of us take to the risks we face? How safer are we if we worry about a plane crash? Do you wear a face mask to avoid SARS? Do you stay out of cars because folks have previously died in them? Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?
#36
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tri-State
Posts: 1,888
Ahem! Ahem!
It could not be consistent could it What about landings at night ? Last week, landing at BRU as the early morning sun was on our window, and we had shades down.
It could not be consistent could it What about landings at night ? Last week, landing at BRU as the early morning sun was on our window, and we had shades down.
#37
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, DL DM since inception, 3+ MM, HH Gold, SPG-Gold
Programs: DL, UA, AA, HH, SPG, HH, Hertz, Avis
Posts: 1,838
This has IMO sort of turned into a silly discussion (which is OK) as most security discussion easily do.
I would submit to you, that if any of us were involved in a survivable "incident", any closed shade would be lifted quicker than you could say "Uhh?" at the first sign of trouble. If the trouble came on in a way that would make us unable to do so, it likely would not matter whether the shades were open or closed!
Even when asked to keep the shades down (during a movie), a small turbulence bumb will get a few passengers to lift the shades. If it was more than a bump, I guarantee you those shades would fly open pronto - sun or no sun! (except perhaps where Yashan sits, as he seems to be able to sleep through a fate worse than torture (see post above)!!)
As so much fooliness we are asked to passive-agressively participate in in the name of "security", this rule, whether enforced or not, IMO doesn't make a shred of difference!
I would submit to you, that if any of us were involved in a survivable "incident", any closed shade would be lifted quicker than you could say "Uhh?" at the first sign of trouble. If the trouble came on in a way that would make us unable to do so, it likely would not matter whether the shades were open or closed!
Even when asked to keep the shades down (during a movie), a small turbulence bumb will get a few passengers to lift the shades. If it was more than a bump, I guarantee you those shades would fly open pronto - sun or no sun! (except perhaps where Yashan sits, as he seems to be able to sleep through a fate worse than torture (see post above)!!)
As so much fooliness we are asked to passive-agressively participate in in the name of "security", this rule, whether enforced or not, IMO doesn't make a shred of difference!
#38
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FLL; DL PM; CO Silver; Hilton Diamond; Priority Club Gold; Hertz PC; National Emerald; et al
Posts: 284
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by AS Flyer:
Actually, you MISSED the point entirely... Not everything the FAA and airlines do is to irritate you.</font>
Actually, you MISSED the point entirely... Not everything the FAA and airlines do is to irritate you.</font>
No, we didn't need to evacuate in either case, but I can tell you everyone was awake (even yashan would be) when the engines failed and the brakes slammed. The window shades would not have slowed us down in any case. You stated that it has been "proved" to be beneficial. I can't imagine you can point to one incident or test proof that actually showed that the shades being up helped in an emergency. Any data on this would be as circumstantial as having your cell phones off - another security measure that we shouldn't get into but is also fairly dumb.
Just be glad you were not on the 10:40AM flight from SAV to ATL today, because we threw CAUTION TO THE WIND on that flight. I had the shade UP for the whole flight. When the four dings went off I promptly lowered the shade - of course the FA had long ago taken their seats to chit-chat instead of service the cabin.
I know this may be a crazy thing to do, but we managed to survive the landing. It was a little rough and one of the overhead bins popped open. I'm sure that my keeping the window shade up would have provided the proper balance of structuraly integrity to keep the bin door in place.
Fear not though... Once we were safely on the ground I opened my shade so I could see how far we were from our gate, so I could dangerously begin to get my bag out from under the "space in front of me" a little early, turn on my cell phone while still the boarding door was still closed, and even undo my seat belt 300 yards from the gate while traveling in excess of 7.5 miles per hour.
They don't call me DANGER-BOY for nothing you know...!!!
#39
Moderator: Coupon Connection & S.P.A.M
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Louisville, KY
Programs: Destination Unknown, TSA Disparager Diamond (LTDD)
Posts: 57,953
I bet you ride the escalator without holding the handrail and eat fruit without washing it first, too.
------------------
"Give me Liberty or give me Death." - Patrick Henry
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by FL-Delta-Platinum:
They don't call me DANGER-BOY for nothing you know...!!!</font>
They don't call me DANGER-BOY for nothing you know...!!!</font>
------------------
"Give me Liberty or give me Death." - Patrick Henry
#40
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SEA - DL DM/2MM, *A Gold, SPG Lifetime Plat, some other car and hotel stuff
Posts: 5,649
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by LexPassenger:
Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?</font>
Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?</font>
#41
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: TBR, Georgia
Programs: AA EXP MM, UA 1P, DL SM
Posts: 386
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by andymo99:
I would say that most of us here worry extensively about our seats being in front of a curtain.</font>
I would say that most of us here worry extensively about our seats being in front of a curtain.</font>
#42
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Berkeley, CA
Programs: UA Gold, peon everywhere else
Posts: 989
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by LexPassenger:
Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?</font>
Do you seriously worry about where you sit on a plane flight?</font>
Dan