Community
Wiki Posts
Search

DL to Discontinue ICN and PVG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:49 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: DL, KE, HA
Posts: 49
DL to Discontinue ICN and PVG

I heard that DL is going to discontinue ATL-ICN and ATL-PVG in couple month. Is is because they're not doing good job on the route?
Is it temporary change because of their fleet merge with NW?
speedbird0125 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:58 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Programs: DL PM, HH Diamond, Fairmont Prem, SPG Gold, Priority Club Plat/IC Amb, AmEx Plat
Posts: 10,839
Welcome to FT.

I highly, highly doubt that either of these routes will be cancelled. While the economy is in the tank, there is still a demand for travel to Asia. If anything, there may be a reduction but a cancellation is very unlikely (especially PVG as DL fought so hard for the route authority).
AndyTLe is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2009, 10:58 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
Welcome to FT, speedbird0125.

My guess is that the suspension of these routes from ATL is a combination of many things - first the merger with NW allows for passengers to still sta within the company to get to these destinations - PVG is served from both NRT and DTW nonstop, so for many passengers that were going via ATL, they can still be rerouted via DTW and have one-stop service. ICN is also served on DL/NW metal still via NRT as well.

The economy is also a big part of this. In a more prosperous time, we might have seen Delta filling these flights a lot more (especially up front). Simply put, a lot of this revenue has dried up. If you've got lower loads on an ultra-long haul flight like these (both are around 7000 miles from Atlanta), it makes costs even more difficult (especially with the recent rise in oil - up nearly $20/barrel over the past 6 weeks).

Between the fact that they can still keep passengers online (or in ICN's case, DL still has the codeshare on KE's ICN-ATL route), it makes sense to cut back a bit where necessary if it means making a profit or not.
mersk862 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 12:55 am
  #4  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
Originally Posted by speedbird0125
I heard that DL is going to discontinue ATL-ICN and ATL-PVG in couple month. Is is because they're not doing good job on the route?
Is it temporary change because of their fleet merge with NW?
No, DL doesn't have any temproarily discontinuation this route for ATL-PVG. So this route for ATL-PVG availability is zero. Because DL/NW are already begin nonstop for DTW-PVG. DL will have to gets award from DOT authority for ATL-PEK will try to get fifth freedom traffic rights. It could be workout very well. DL will have considered for ATL-PEK will have to be exchange from PVG. I'm surely the loads will be very successful route on DL.

Because ATL-PVG are very poorly performance and this is reason why DL has been discontinuation for ATL-PVG. So DL will have to flying somewhere else either way in JFK or LAX beyond bound to Asia flights. I think DL will have to be stepped it up to get more new international route for ATL-GUM/AMM/CAI/IST/BEY/JED/DOH. I think this is restrictions any specific in Middle Eastern will denying to be denial approval for ATL-JED due to security concerns. I think this is best idea where DL will have to be expanded new transpacific routes for LAX-NAN/GUM/RAR/MAJ/PPG/PPT. It would have to be particularly consideration. This is so popular islands leisure vacation trip out of LAX is more convenient for DL. I think it would be done extremely very well.

Last edited by N830MH; Jun 18, 2009 at 1:01 am
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 1:09 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 1,212
Originally Posted by N830MH
I think DL will have to be stepped it up to get more new international route for ATL-GUM/AMM/CAI/IST/BEY/JED/DOH. I think this is restrictions any specific in Middle Eastern will denying to be denial approval for ATL-JED due to security concerns.
I hadn't heard that DL was thinking of flying to Saudi Arabia. But as far as security goes, there are non-stop flights between Saudi and the US, not to mention numerous flights between Europe and Saudi. So there are no official security concerns or restrictions on flying between the US and Saudi, and there is no reason for anyone to deny approval of this route. DL might have its own security concerns, but Saudi Arabia remains safe for Western airlines to fly to, and is very safe for Western flight crews -- there has never been a security incident related to a Western airline or flight crew in Saudi Arabia.
AGSF is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 1:15 am
  #6  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
Originally Posted by AGSF
I hadn't heard that DL was thinking of flying to Saudi Arabia. But as far as security goes, there are non-stop flights between Saudi and the US, not to mention numerous flights between Europe and Saudi. So there are no official security concerns or restrictions on flying between the US and Saudi, and there is no reason for anyone to deny approval of this route. DL might have its own security concerns, but Saudi Arabia remains safe for Western airlines to fly to, and is very safe for Western flight crews -- there has never been a security incident related to a Western airline or flight crew in Saudi Arabia.
I think you mentioned where SV are already flies out of Saudia Arabia-IAD/JFK, too.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 8:30 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Auckland, NZ/New York, NY/ATL
Programs: DL DM MM, BIS 2.4MM, EK Gold, SQ Gold, Marriott Gold, HH Gold,
Posts: 5,222
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta...september.html
DLATL777 is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 1:34 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Queens, New York City.
Programs: Delta Diamond Medallion
Posts: 120
Here is a response from Delta Airlines regarding the ATL-ICN and ATL-PVG routes:

Due to the global economic recession and rising oil prices Delta has
been forced to reduce capacity in various markets. We announced on June
11th that we will be discontinuing our non-stop Atlanta/Seoul service on
August 30, 2009. Our non-stop service to Shanghai will be ending on
September 1st. We will still offer convenient connecting service to
both destinations.
Kumaranyc is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 1:51 pm
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Programs: DL PM, HH Diamond, Fairmont Prem, SPG Gold, Priority Club Plat/IC Amb, AmEx Plat
Posts: 10,839
Originally Posted by Kumaranyc
Here is a response from Delta Airlines regarding the ATL-ICN and ATL-PVG routes:

Due to the global economic recession and rising oil prices Delta has
been forced to reduce capacity in various markets. We announced on June
11th that we will be discontinuing our non-stop Atlanta/Seoul service on
August 30, 2009. Our non-stop service to Shanghai will be ending on
September 1st. We will still offer convenient connecting service to
both destinations.
I stand corrected.
AndyTLe is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 2:38 pm
  #10  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
Originally Posted by AndyTLe
I stand corrected.
Yeah, unfortunately for DL will be no longer for ATL-ICN/PVG. Hopefully someday in the future DL will have ever to be reinstated if the global economic will have speedily recovery.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 2:49 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: VPS
Programs: DL DM/2MM, Etihad Gold, HHonors Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 4,787
Originally Posted by N830MH
I think DL will have to be stepped it up to get more new international route for ATL-GUM/AMM/CAI/IST/BEY/JED/DOH. I think this is restrictions any specific in Middle Eastern will denying to be denial approval for ATL-JED due to security concerns.
Would love to see ATL-JED and ATL-DOH, but is the demand really there for these routes?
DLfan is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 4:26 pm
  #12  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Programs: AA Gold AAdvantage Elite, Rapids Reward
Posts: 38,326
Originally Posted by DLfan
Would love to see ATL-JED and ATL-DOH, but is the demand really there for these routes?
Yes, I believe that so. DL will have more demand growth to be introduce nonstop for ATL-JED/DOH. I think it will have enough for between 3x or 4x weekly frequencies roundtrip instead of daily nonstop to Middle Eastern.
N830MH is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 7:05 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seoul
Programs: Delta DM, MM
Posts: 150
Wow, this is a big bummer for me. I live in both Seoul and HSV (a short hop from ATL). Yikes.
rclott is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 7:15 pm
  #14  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL
Programs: DL PM, HH Diamond, Fairmont Prem, SPG Gold, Priority Club Plat/IC Amb, AmEx Plat
Posts: 10,839
Originally Posted by rclott
Wow, this is a big bummer for me. I live in both Seoul and HSV (a short hop from ATL). Yikes.
KE's codeshare is still an option.
AndyTLe is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2009, 9:14 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
The non-stop ATL-asia routes fly pretty much straight over DTW as it is, so might as well condense down to the one-hop to DTW and then over.

If they're feeling really generous, they can use the same flight number all the way through like NW does SIN-MSP and back.
raehl311 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.