CPT lounge for Delta One
Apr 13, 2024, 7:19 am
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,721
It is showing CPT lounges when I do it.
Apr 13, 2024, 4:07 pm
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
See "Delta Sky Club® & Other Lounge Locations" page here (and select D1 for ticket type) --- https://www.delta.com/us/en/delta-sky-club/locations
It is showing CPT lounges when I do it.
It is showing CPT lounges when I do it.
Thanks.
Apr 13, 2024, 4:28 pm
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,241
Thus correctly doesn't show. If both are checked, lounge must qualify for both options to be listed
Apr 13, 2024, 8:34 pm
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
If multiple options are selected, lounge roster should show a lounge that has entry privilege if at least one of the selected options is eligible, not all selected options have to be eligible.
"Lounge access for international First or Business Class ticket holders or SkyTeam Elite Plus Frequent Flyers traveling on an international flight operated by the following airlines" makes most sense if there was a comma before the highlighted "or", indicating all First and Biz holders (regardless of airline) are eligible, as well as STE+ international flyers from AF/KL/VS
This is the kind of ambiguity and misinterpretation that the serial comma is intended to eliminate, especially when there is a modifying clause after the last item in a conjuction. While style guides within the Anglophone world might differ on whether the serial comma is required in all situations, there is agreement about it's use when ambiguity is likely to arise due to modifying clause(s) subsequent to the final item.
Lets agree to disagree
Apr 14, 2024, 5:27 am
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,241
Sorry to disagree, but for it to be correct as you state, the lounge would have to deny entry to a D1 passenger because (s)he is ALSO a skymiles e+. Doubt that will happen.
If multiple options are selected, lounge roster should show a lounge that has entry privilege if at least one of the selected options is eligible, not all selected options have to be eligible.
"Lounge access for international First or Business Class ticket holders or SkyTeam Elite Plus Frequent Flyers traveling on an international flight operated by the following airlines" makes most sense if there was a comma before the highlighted "or", indicating all First and Biz holders (regardless of airline) are eligible, as well as STE+ international flyers from AF/KL/VS
This is the kind of ambiguity and misinterpretation that the serial comma is intended to eliminate, especially when there is a modifying clause after the last item in a conjuction. While style guides within the Anglophone world might differ on whether the serial comma is required in all situations, there is agreement about it's use when ambiguity is likely to arise due to modifying clause(s) subsequent to the final item.
Lets agree to disagree
If multiple options are selected, lounge roster should show a lounge that has entry privilege if at least one of the selected options is eligible, not all selected options have to be eligible.
"Lounge access for international First or Business Class ticket holders or SkyTeam Elite Plus Frequent Flyers traveling on an international flight operated by the following airlines" makes most sense if there was a comma before the highlighted "or", indicating all First and Biz holders (regardless of airline) are eligible, as well as STE+ international flyers from AF/KL/VS
This is the kind of ambiguity and misinterpretation that the serial comma is intended to eliminate, especially when there is a modifying clause after the last item in a conjuction. While style guides within the Anglophone world might differ on whether the serial comma is required in all situations, there is agreement about it's use when ambiguity is likely to arise due to modifying clause(s) subsequent to the final item.
Lets agree to disagree
Apr 16, 2024, 8:04 pm
#9
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL DM/1MM, Natl Exec Elite, Bonvoy Plat, Hyatt Glob, Hilton Diam
Posts: 382
There's a new Bidvest lounge further down the concourse that D1 passengers have access to. The gate agent made sure I knew which one to go to, and I thought I did know. But that old Bidvest lounge may as well entirely be a smoking lounge given the smoke outflow of their indoor smoking area. Anyway, the new one is above the restaurant down towards the Emirates lounge.
Apr 16, 2024, 9:42 pm
#10
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 184
There's a new Bidvest lounge further down the concourse that D1 passengers have access to. The gate agent made sure I knew which one to go to, and I thought I did know. But that old Bidvest lounge may as well entirely be a smoking lounge given the smoke outflow of their indoor smoking area. Anyway, the new one is above the restaurant down towards the Emirates lounge.