First Class Meals - "FEBO"
#16
#17
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Gold, GlobalEntry, Admirals Club, United Club
Posts: 1,948
Yeah, but why do it "randomly" or even with the appearance of randomness? What purpose does that serve?
Also, I agree, I wasn't trying to compare eastbound vs westbound to the flight number method, just noting for the sake of other airlines also change the order based on a strange criteria.
Also, I agree, I wasn't trying to compare eastbound vs westbound to the flight number method, just noting for the sake of other airlines also change the order based on a strange criteria.
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,413
#19
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: PHX
Programs: Delta DM, Marriott Lifetime Titanium, HHonrs Diamond
Posts: 1,336
The widebodies are off that route for the summer.
FEBO is their policy. Passengers should not have to remind crews what their policy is.
I have never seen a flight on this route where the vegetarian option ran out first. On the return ATL-PHX for lunch they had 3 choices and 2 were vegetarian (one was Impossible Burger). Even numbered flight and they started in the front. The odd numbered flights are really the true test of FEBO.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
It was the flight leader that gave me the points for running out of snack boxes without me asking for the points. That flight was a 767.
The widebodies are off that route for the summer.
FEBO is their policy. Passengers should not have to remind crews what their policy is.
I have never seen a flight on this route where the vegetarian option ran out first. On the return ATL-PHX for lunch they had 3 choices and 2 were vegetarian (one was Impossible Burger).
The widebodies are off that route for the summer.
FEBO is their policy. Passengers should not have to remind crews what their policy is.
I have never seen a flight on this route where the vegetarian option ran out first. On the return ATL-PHX for lunch they had 3 choices and 2 were vegetarian (one was Impossible Burger).
#22
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,409
Why does it matter for FEBO that some routes use the same flight number in both directions? If roughly half of DL narrow body flights have odd numbers and half even numbers, then FEBO is a predictable way to take meal orders half of the time from the front and half of the time from the back. Hence on some flights, front seats will be more desirable and seats farther back will be more desirable on other flights. The system would still work as intended.
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
Why does it matter for FEBO that some routes use the same flight number in both directions? If roughly half of DL narrow body flights have odd numbers and half even numbers, then FEBO is a predictable way to take meal orders half of the time from the front and half of the time from the back. Hence on some flights, front seats will be more desirable and seats farther back will be more desirable on other flights. The system would still work as intended.
#24
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,409
FEBO worked well because flight numbers used to be odd one direction and even the other. Most OAL still follow this. US airlines have been running out of numbers and resorted to same number both directions FEBO was designed so that one direction meals were from front, the other from back.
#25
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Antonio
Programs: DL DM, Former AA EXP now AY Plat, AC 75K, NW Plat, Former CO Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 27,042
What objective would the one direction versus the other direction procedure satisfy? The idea is to have an easily understandable rule that results in roughly half of the narrow body flights taking meal orders from the front and roughly half from the back. Trying to use east/west or north/south just adds potential confusion, as would (for example) a to versus from the center of the country (STL?) rule. If you don't like flight numbers, we could use the last digit (odd versus even) of the segment's scheduled departure time, assuming that they're evenly distributed.
#26
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Programs: AA EXP, Hyatt Diamond, SPG Gold, GlobalEntry, Admirals Club, United Club
Posts: 1,948
The whole point of FEBO was ensuring if you liked the front seats, you got meal preference one direction, if you like back seats you got it the other. Everyone flying RT got equal chance this way. FEBO was simply an easier acronym than FEBW or FWBE or BEFW or BWFE. Worked fine till airlines went to using same number roundtrip. They're still supposed to do the same thing as before, just based on east/west and north/south.
#27
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 3,097
FEBO worked well because flight numbers used to be odd one direction and even the other. Most OAL still follow this. US airlines have been running out of numbers and resorted to same number both directions FEBO was designed so that one direction meals were from front, the other from back.
Like, the individual passengers are still able to select different seats on each flight, and most people don't just take the plane to a city and immediately fly back on the same plane.
In my experience, most routes where they use the same flight number in both directions are too short to have meal service anyway.
#28
Moderator: Hyatt; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: WAS
Programs: :rolleyes:, DL DM, Mlife Plat, Caesars Diam, Marriott Tit, UA Gold, Hyatt Glob, invol FT beta tester
Posts: 18,928
Currently limited to D1, plus select domestic F routes with upgraded service. Pre-order discussion has its own thread, keep an eye on that one for updates:
Pre-ordering Meals on Delta, the Definitive Thread
Pre-ordering Meals on Delta, the Definitive Thread
#29
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,409
The whole point of FEBO was ensuring if you liked the front seats, you got meal preference one direction, if you like back seats you got it the other. Everyone flying RT got equal chance this way. FEBO was simply an easier acronym than FEBW or FWBE or BEFW or BWFE. Worked fine till airlines went to using same number roundtrip. They're still supposed to do the same thing as before, just based on east/west and north/south.
#30
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: MA
Programs: DL DM/2MM Marriott Platinum, HH Diamond,
Posts: 8,906
While I understand that the cabin crew does not necessarily have this information, a system that gave priority for ordering to someone who had paid for the FC seat weeks ago vs. someone who had been upgraded in the last 5 days or at the gate would be the fairest. I have certainly seen situations where non-revs were given the last choices, mostly on long haul D1 flights.