Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Amex IAP -- $13k discount on published fare??

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Amex IAP -- $13k discount on published fare??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2019, 5:50 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Programs: AA EXP, DL DM, SPG Plat, Hilton Gold
Posts: 2,127
Try booking it, if it tickets then you are golden. Once you have a ticket number, DL is not going to refuse to honor it. And obviously you have 24 hours to cxl.

Amex uses a different faring platform than DL so sometimes it finds things Delta.com cannot or will not combine.
mizzou miles is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2019, 8:27 pm
  #17  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: JFK / LGA.. EWR is not part of NYC!
Programs: Brand loyalty is for suckers
Posts: 1,047
OK -- a little bit of an update.. it ticketed! Once I plugged the confirmation into my DL account page, I was able to see that we had booked into Z, and as I mentioned above, attempting to buy this directly from DL would only let us buy into C (for 10k+ a pop!). Exact same dates/segments: JFK-LAX-PPT, then SCL-ATL-JFK. Total price per person was about $3600. So the IAP allowed us to buy into Z for >13k in savings over DL directly, though obviously as I mentioned above, no one would really pay that price.

While not quite a premium fare deal, it seems like a crazy good price to me, so we're sticking with it!
OhDoctor is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2019, 8:31 pm
  #18  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
You seem to have an open jaw between PPT and SCL. I wonder whether the difference is in the check that the unflown portion is shorter than the flown segments, with DL and AmEx perhaps doing the calculation differently, so that DL want to sell this as two one way trips while the IAP considers it to be a legitimate open jaw itinerary (with IIRC the IAP not covering one way or multicity international tickets, so that to make a sale, it must be either a RT or an OJ itineraryt)
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 20, 2019, 9:21 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,237
So technically it looks to me like JFK-PPT/SCL-JFK should qualify as a legit open jaw, as PPT-SCL is the shortest of the legs, albeit barely. (I don't think connecting cities matter, but if they did, it only helps the case).
But perhaps the pricing engine Amex uses doesn't have the regional restrictions that someone upthread alluded to, and maybe DL does (e.g., it might make sense that both destination cities need to be in the same region, however defined (IATA?).)
I also wonder if perhaps a DL phone agent would have been able to book this as an OJ instead of two one-ways.
Attached Images  
ijgordon is online now  
Old Oct 20, 2019, 9:23 pm
  #20  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 23,066
Originally Posted by ijgordon
So technically it looks to me like JFK-PPT/SCL-JFK should qualify as a legit open jaw, as PPT-SCL is the shortest of the legs, albeit barely. (I don't think connecting cities matter, but if they did, it only helps the case).
But perhaps the pricing engine Amex uses doesn't have the regional restrictions that someone upthread alluded to, and maybe DL does.
I also wonder if perhaps a DL phone agent would have been able to book this as an OJ instead of two one-ways.
I covered this is an earlier post. C fares just require that the open-jaw length be the shortest distance. Z fares are more restrictive and open jaws are based on regions and SCL and PPT are not in the same region. Don't know why the IAP is ticketing in Z, but that is why DL will only ticket in C.
xliioper is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2019, 9:12 am
  #21  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
IIRC some Z fares require RT purchase and don't permit OJs (but they do allow co-terminal airports).
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2019, 11:54 am
  #22  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: JFK / LGA.. EWR is not part of NYC!
Programs: Brand loyalty is for suckers
Posts: 1,047
Originally Posted by ijgordon
So technically it looks to me like JFK-PPT/SCL-JFK should qualify as a legit open jaw, as PPT-SCL is the shortest of the legs, albeit barely. (I don't think connecting cities matter, but if they did, it only helps the case).
But perhaps the pricing engine Amex uses doesn't have the regional restrictions that someone upthread alluded to, and maybe DL does (e.g., it might make sense that both destination cities need to be in the same region, however defined (IATA?).)
I also wonder if perhaps a DL phone agent would have been able to book this as an OJ instead of two one-ways.
One interesting clue, for what it's worth.. If I go back to amextravel.com and try to book this without the last segment (i.e. as a JFK-PPT-LAX, then SCL-ATL open jaw), Amex looks like it will only offer me a C fare at >8k per person. But if I keep that exact same itinerary and dates, and add back the ATL-JFK segment on the end of the return, I can book into Z again, and the price drops by more than half!

So it seems that if ATL was my final destination, it would behoove me to know I could skiplag the return and save a bundle.
OhDoctor is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2019, 1:09 pm
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,237
Originally Posted by OhDoctor
One interesting clue, for what it's worth.. If I go back to amextravel.com and try to book this without the last segment (i.e. as a JFK-PPT-LAX, then SCL-ATL open jaw), Amex looks like it will only offer me a C fare at >8k per person. But if I keep that exact same itinerary and dates, and add back the ATL-JFK segment on the end of the return, I can book into Z again, and the price drops by more than half!

So it seems that if ATL was my final destination, it would behoove me to know I could skiplag the return and save a bundle.
Without checking GCMap again, I believe the return SCL-ATL routing is shorter than the open/unflown PPT-SCL segment, and thus it wouldn't qualify as an open jaw, but rather two one-ways.

Still not exactly clear to me why Amex will ticket the Z fare as an open jaw while Delta requires a higher C fare.
ijgordon is online now  
Old Oct 21, 2019, 1:19 pm
  #24  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: JFK / LGA.. EWR is not part of NYC!
Programs: Brand loyalty is for suckers
Posts: 1,047
Interesting, good to know. I guess not particularly illuminating then. I always considered myself a relatively seasoned traveler but then a discussion about fare or routing rules likes this pops up and shows that I really don't know nothin'!
OhDoctor is offline  
Old Oct 21, 2019, 3:57 pm
  #25  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Originally Posted by OhDoctor
One interesting clue, for what it's worth.. If I go back to amextravel.com and try to book this without the last segment (i.e. as a JFK-PPT-LAX, then SCL-ATL open jaw), Amex looks like it will only offer me a C fare at >8k per person. But if I keep that exact same itinerary and dates, and add back the ATL-JFK segment on the end of the return, I can book into Z again, and the price drops by more than half!

So it seems that if ATL was my final destination, it would behoove me to know I could skiplag the return and save a bundle.
If you drop the last segment, it becomes a "double open jaw" which isn't allowed by most fare rules. At best, you can book it using multicity.....and hence it's more expensive.
MSPeconomist is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.