GUC Use > Banging Head vs. Wall (Rant)
#46
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
EF does specify that Z is for GUC upgrades on KL while O is for some other kind of upgrades, which may mean mileage upgrades.
My more general observation on married segments is that when I was booking, I saw (not for my dates, but for other dates) lots of NYC-AMS-CPT options where the routings with KL-operated JFK-AMS flights showed 0 Z on both sectors, but the routings with DL-operated JFK/EWR-AMS flights showed available Z space on both sectors. But it's not clear if that's "real" space since you're not actually booking Z space on the DL sector, you're booking OY space, but does the married segment logic still create Z availability on the KL sector? And if it doesn't, does Z availability for an independent AMS-CPT trip govern upgrade availability on that sector?
My more general observation on married segments is that when I was booking, I saw (not for my dates, but for other dates) lots of NYC-AMS-CPT options where the routings with KL-operated JFK-AMS flights showed 0 Z on both sectors, but the routings with DL-operated JFK/EWR-AMS flights showed available Z space on both sectors. But it's not clear if that's "real" space since you're not actually booking Z space on the DL sector, you're booking OY space, but does the married segment logic still create Z availability on the KL sector? And if it doesn't, does Z availability for an independent AMS-CPT trip govern upgrade availability on that sector?
However, my understanding (which agrees with EF) is that O inventory is KLM classic (low) award space in business class. It would be what we want for award tickets using DL miles.
#47
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,050
Whereas Z is specific to Delta certs: "Business - Upgrade with DL SWU/Global Upgrades & Fare Class (Z)" (I take the part after the ampersand to reflect the fact that Z is also a paid KLM business class fare)
BA and VS also use the same fare bucket for awards and upgrades so there is some precedent for European carriers doing this, and this article suggests that upgrades using FB miles go into O. But none of that means for sure that KL upgrades using DL miles go into O. Also totally unclear to me why mileage and GUC upgrades go into different buckets, but considering Z seems to be somewhat more commonly available than O, let's not complain.
(BTW, if you do get the upgrade processed into O, I wouldn't be surprised if you then don't earn miles for that flight since DL will read it as an award, which may require some work and luck to correct, if indeed it's correctable at all. I had imagined this might be a problem with the VS upgrades into G as well, but since it seems no one ever successfully achieved one of those upgrades, there probably aren't any data points on how that worked.)
Last edited by bgriff; Jun 22, 2017 at 10:58 am
#48
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
ExpertFlyer says it's both: "Business - Classic Award & Upgrade (O)"
Whereas Z is specific to Delta certs: "Business - Upgrade with DL SWU/Global Upgrades & Fare Class (Z)" (I take the part after the ampersand to reflect the fact that Z is also a paid KLM business class fare)
BA and VS also use the same fare bucket for awards and upgrades so there is some precedent for European carriers doing this, and this article suggests that upgrades using FB miles go into O. But none of that means for sure that KL upgrades using DL miles go into O. Also totally unclear to me why mileage and GUC upgrades go into different buckets, but considering Z seems to be somewhat more commonly available than O, let's not complain.
(BTW, if you do get the upgrade processed into O, I wouldn't be surprised if you then don't earn miles for that flight since DL will read it as an award, which may require some work and luck to correct, if indeed it's correctable at all. I had imagined this might be a problem with the VS upgrades into G as well, but since it seems no one ever successfully achieved one of those upgrades, there probably aren't any data points on how that worked.)
Whereas Z is specific to Delta certs: "Business - Upgrade with DL SWU/Global Upgrades & Fare Class (Z)" (I take the part after the ampersand to reflect the fact that Z is also a paid KLM business class fare)
BA and VS also use the same fare bucket for awards and upgrades so there is some precedent for European carriers doing this, and this article suggests that upgrades using FB miles go into O. But none of that means for sure that KL upgrades using DL miles go into O. Also totally unclear to me why mileage and GUC upgrades go into different buckets, but considering Z seems to be somewhat more commonly available than O, let's not complain.
(BTW, if you do get the upgrade processed into O, I wouldn't be surprised if you then don't earn miles for that flight since DL will read it as an award, which may require some work and luck to correct, if indeed it's correctable at all. I had imagined this might be a problem with the VS upgrades into G as well, but since it seems no one ever successfully achieved one of those upgrades, there probably aren't any data points on how that worked.)
However, I never realized that KLM uses different inventory classes for DL GUCs versus DL upgrades with miles or the SkyTeam upgrade award program way to upgrade with miles, which requires an even higher fare class.
What I'm seeing on EF for the intraEU KLM flights I was considering makes me suspect that as a result, it's much easier to upgrade these flights with DL miles than with DL GUCs that are only available to DMs. If anything, this is the opposite of what I would have expected, but perhaps upgrades with miles result in a transfer of money from DL to KLM but GUC usage doesn't. I'm speculating, but if these rules are correct, it's surprising.
#49
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,050
Taking another random example, AMS-TXL for next year ... EF won't show exact quantities of O available, but searching for 8 seats very few flights show O available, but at least half of the flights show 8 or 9 Z seats.
It is possible there are specific cases where O is more available than Z though, especially if O availability is not based on married segment logic. (Before I got my GUCs to work, I booked a EWR-AMS-CPT business class award, meaning there was definitely O available on AMS-CPT on a date when no Z was showing if starting from NYC.)
#50
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Just when we thought FF programs couldn't get any more complicated. Now we discover that there are additional less obvious things to consider when deciding whether to use GUCs or miles to upgrade.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
#51
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 159
Just when we thought FF programs couldn't get any more complicated. Now we discover that there are additional less obvious things to consider when deciding whether to use GUCs or miles to upgrade.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
For the record, KLM Y fares upgrade to Z class, and B and M upgrade to O class.
Delta marketed KLM flights go to Z (for GUCs).
#52
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
However, I'm still puzzled because, as I mentioned upthread, for the KLM flights I was considering, EF tended to show more O than Z availability, although often when Z was a positive it would have a fair number of such seats, while EF only shows "yes" with no quantity indication for the O bucket.
Suppose someone (such as a DM) has purchased a ticket for a KLM flight with a KLM flight number and wants to upgrade, where Z = 0 but O = yes. Can the Y fare ticket upgrade into the available O space if Z isn't available or is the customer going to be punished for having bought the more expensive ticket?
#53
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 159
Sigh. I remember the time with PMNW when one could get more upgrade space by moving from an M to a B fare, which usually wasn't much of a price difference. Now it's only Y, just like the SkyTeam (mileage award) upgrade program.
However, I'm still puzzled because, as I mentioned upthread, for the KLM flights I was considering, EF tended to show more O than Z availability, although often when Z was a positive it would have a fair number of such seats, while EF only shows "yes" with no quantity indication for the O bucket.
Suppose someone (such as a DM) has purchased a ticket for a KLM flight with a KLM flight number and wants to upgrade, where Z = 0 but O = yes. Can the Y fare ticket upgrade into the available O space if Z isn't available or is the customer going to be punished for having bought the more expensive ticket?
However, I'm still puzzled because, as I mentioned upthread, for the KLM flights I was considering, EF tended to show more O than Z availability, although often when Z was a positive it would have a fair number of such seats, while EF only shows "yes" with no quantity indication for the O bucket.
Suppose someone (such as a DM) has purchased a ticket for a KLM flight with a KLM flight number and wants to upgrade, where Z = 0 but O = yes. Can the Y fare ticket upgrade into the available O space if Z isn't available or is the customer going to be punished for having bought the more expensive ticket?
#54
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
KLM 1693 6/23
KLM 1695 6/24
KLM 1693 6/24
KLM 1697 6/24
KLM 1695 6/25
KLM 1693 6/25
KLM 1697 6/25
KLM 1692 6/29
KLM 1694 6/29
KLM 1694 6/30
KLM 1694 7/1
KLM 1696 7/2
KLM 1694 7/2
KLM 1692 7/3
KLM 1694 7/3
Maybe this route is weird, but I don't see any obvious reasons for this.
#55
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 159
Here are a bunch of current examples from EF where O = yes but Z = 0:
KLM 1693 6/23
KLM 1695 6/24
KLM 1693 6/24
KLM 1697 6/24
KLM 1695 6/25
KLM 1693 6/25
KLM 1697 6/25
KLM 1692 6/29
KLM 1694 6/29
KLM 1694 6/30
KLM 1694 7/1
KLM 1696 7/2
KLM 1694 7/2
KLM 1692 7/3
KLM 1694 7/3
Maybe this route is weird, but I don't see any obvious reasons for this.
KLM 1693 6/23
KLM 1695 6/24
KLM 1693 6/24
KLM 1697 6/24
KLM 1695 6/25
KLM 1693 6/25
KLM 1697 6/25
KLM 1692 6/29
KLM 1694 6/29
KLM 1694 6/30
KLM 1694 7/1
KLM 1696 7/2
KLM 1694 7/2
KLM 1692 7/3
KLM 1694 7/3
Maybe this route is weird, but I don't see any obvious reasons for this.
Though Z is both discounted J and an upgrade class...I wonder if it may show no Z for purchase, but will show Z for Upgrade. That's interesting...
#56
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,050
That's odd. I don't use EF, so I don't know how often it returns phantom space. Can't imagine all of them are phantom, though it does happen a decent amount with KL.
Though Z is both discounted J and an upgrade class...I wonder if it may show no Z for purchase, but will show Z for Upgrade. That's interesting...
Though Z is both discounted J and an upgrade class...I wonder if it may show no Z for purchase, but will show Z for Upgrade. That's interesting...
As far as I can tell, EF's view of Z is the same whether you search for regular availability (showing all fare classes including Z) or you search for it as an upgrade class. So it doesn't appear there is differential availability, unless there is something else going on that EF doesn't have access to. Z can also change based on married segments, though checking a few different logical routings with the flights MSPEconomist listed, I don't see any where Z becomes available.
It would make somewhat more sense if KLM did what Delta sometimes does where a cheaper fare class is open, and you can see it as such in EF, but it has advance purchase requirements so you can't actually buy it. (On Delta this comes up when you are sometimes able to SDC into an open cheap fare class even though you can't buy a new ticket in that fare class.) But for this set of example routes at least, that doesn't appear to be what KLM is doing.
So for last-minute upgrades it would appear a B,M fare could actually be easier to upgrade using miles than a Y fare, and easier than using GUCs on any fare, at least for shorthaul KLM flights.
Last edited by bgriff; Jun 23, 2017 at 7:44 am
#57
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,417
Just when we thought FF programs couldn't get any more complicated. Now we discover that there are additional less obvious things to consider when deciding whether to use GUCs or miles to upgrade.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
Plus, it will be fun seeing whether flights flown in KLM O class will post when they're upgrades paid with miles but not post when they're low award inventory. Still, I suspect that this was KLM's choice and not something that DL could have done.
#58
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SE USA
Programs: DL DM/MM , IHG Plat, MR Titanium, HH Gold, EK Frequent Kettle, UA Silver, AA Hater
Posts: 2,020
It gets better!
First, glad to know I'm not alone on this. Second, here's another endorsement of HUCA.
So I realized after the ticket was reissued that the first leg of my return which had been a DL-codeshare was changed to a KL-coded flight in the agent's attempt to apply the GUC. I called back (now 24 hours after initial issue) and explained to an agent what had happened. Eleven minutes later, she had it all fixed and the GUC applied for the whole return trip back. As she said, lots of people just don't know how to use the Deltamatic system to get the GUCs confirmed. She was aghast when I told her I'd been on the phone for 2+ hours the day prior.
I suppose the moral of the story here is, we must persist in order to get the full value of GUCs!
First, glad to know I'm not alone on this. Second, here's another endorsement of HUCA.
So I realized after the ticket was reissued that the first leg of my return which had been a DL-codeshare was changed to a KL-coded flight in the agent's attempt to apply the GUC. I called back (now 24 hours after initial issue) and explained to an agent what had happened. Eleven minutes later, she had it all fixed and the GUC applied for the whole return trip back. As she said, lots of people just don't know how to use the Deltamatic system to get the GUCs confirmed. She was aghast when I told her I'd been on the phone for 2+ hours the day prior.
I suppose the moral of the story here is, we must persist in order to get the full value of GUCs!
My next trip is all DL coded, mostly AF metal. Everything is good now, but I have had DL flight numbers convert to operating carrier flight numbers during schedule changes. So there is one more thing to worry about.
Regarding GUC, mine usually expire or get used on short domestic trips at the last minute. I get them in case I need them or can use them but they usually go to waste. The frustration around using them is why I would never waste my time with RUC's. You would think this would be easy to automate to remove the agent error.......he he
If there was an easy and reliable way to use these I would max out GUC and RUC during choice bennie selection. Don't like the battlefield game
#60
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn
Programs: Delta Diamond, Bonvoy something good; sometimes other things too
Posts: 5,050
For KLM upgrades, the rules and patterns may be different, but again at least some routes will have space available through the end of the calendar. Last-minute GUC upgrade space on KLM appears to be somewhat less common than on Delta (see discussion in the last few pages of this thread), perhaps because KLM GUC upgrade space is also used for discounted cash business class seats.