Guys, the OP is a troll, has posted this drivel about not needing airports within 8 hours of each other before. Only has one other locked post with the same pointless ranting. Don't feed it.
|
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24666305)
WN's success and meteoric rise proved my point exactly. They went where the demand is, focused on the domestic market, focused on a single type of aircraft, didn't get distracted, and did things right. Meanwhile, DL has no identity, it's this big mess that has 11 mainline aircraft, regional partners with another half-dozen or so, and no focus. They're flying long-haul international, mainline domestic, everything down to their regional partners flying ridiculously tiny planes on ridiculously tiny routes. With the exception of part of Montana and North Dakota, WN now serves the entire CONUS with commercial mainline service with 1/17th the number of types of aircraft, and probably 1/2-1/3 the number of airports. WN is a model of efficiency.
|
Originally Posted by CPMaverick
(Post 24666771)
Guys, the OP is a troll, has posted this drivel about not needing airports within 8 hours of each other before. Only has one other locked post with the same pointless ranting. Don't feed it.
Originally Posted by jb1012xna
(Post 24666792)
And if someone is making a profit on those "tiny" planes and "tiny" routes then...ehh it's all worth nothing because everything is "tiny"? You also need to add MS and WY to the "CONUS" that WN doesn't fly to...yet other majors see to.
The only real civilization in WY is near DEN, which is well served by WN as a hub. Yellowstone is served by SLC. Does anyone fly mainline to anywhere in WY? There's no market to fly to with Cheyenne and Laramie near a WN hub, and Yellowstone served by the DL hub at SLC. In terms of profits, a small profit off of a tiny minority of passengers shouldn't trump the interests of the masses in de-clogging the big airports and making the whole system more efficient. If people want to live in BFE, fine, but don't expect convenient air service from BFE to anywhere. Every major population center in the US has multiple mainline carriers already. |
MA is an ironic situation. Most of it's domestic air service is handled via CT, RI, or NH, not MA itself. And then there's the cluster**** that is BOS that people get stuck with for international or Alaska flying, which is an awesome airport in it's own right, there's just nowhere to pahk the cah so to speak.
|
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24666973)
Most of it's domestic air service is handled via CT, RI, or NH, not MA itself.
26.5 million domestic passengers in BOS for 2014. MHT - 1.04 million (down 13% by the way) PVD - 1.79 million (down 7%) BDL - 2.91 million (up 8%) |
I shouldn't, but slow morning at work so I'll bite.
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24666046)
Some only fly to LGA today. Also, it's really hard to get to LGA, which is why I've never flown out of there. From CT, JFK is easy, you just go on the E train to Jamaica and AirTrain from there. For LGA, you either have to take the M60 from 125th or, IIRC, the Q70 from the 7, neither of which looks like a good deal. I guess I should just learn the bus system and suck it up and do the 7/Q70 route.
Cab LGA to/from Midtown = $30 and 20-45 mins Cab from LGA to Woodside, then LIRR to Penn Station = $25 and 35 mins Cab from JFK to Manhattan = $65 and 1+ hour Airtrain + E train JFK to Manhattan = $10 and 1.5 hrs depending on where, exactly, you're going For those of us going places other than CT, LGA is generally a very nice option to have. Your personal circumstance is not the center of the universe, as you seem to imagine. Two other things: 1. You've never flown from LGA, so how do you know it's hard to get to? Have you ever tried? 2. Curious how you fly out of JFK all the time since it isn't even served by WN. By your logic, everyone should just fly to BWI, I guess, and then rent a car to drive to NYC. JFK was never designed for that traffic volume, and there isn't enough room. Reducing the number of flight movements by 30-40% would pretty much eliminate the delays. Comparing JFK to ATL is useless, because ATL is designed to be the largest airport in the world. JFK wasn't designed to be a fraction of that. I'm BWI centric, but MDW is WN's largest hub, although they are pretty well spread out between BWI, MDW, DEN, and sort of MCO. Speaking of research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwe...nes#Top_cities FedEX and UPS fly jets to everywhere that need them. They truck to other places. The USPS can truck as well. The only places I know of that can't truck are in Alaska, and they use 737's to deliver everything, and don't have airport congestion either. It wasn't really on the map in the first place. For the vast majority of normal people, Pellston isn't on the map anyway. They fly out of DTW or maybe TVC, FNT, or GRR. That area of MI is busy in the summer, and I can tell you that almost no one is flying up there. Most are from the southern part of MI, and the few who aren't, like myself, are flying into DTW. Your choices and lifestyle do not reduce the importance of anyone else in the world. I need 6'4" to even have a shot on the thing. Even if I fit, the tickets are absurdly expensive to BFE. If I need to go to BFE, then I fly near BFE, and complete my journey beating someone else's car up. I can get almost anywhere in the CONUS with low fares on flysouthwest.com, home of the low fares. The Amtrak Empire Builder serves a good chunk of Montana and North Dakota if I want to go there, or I can roadtrip it. Another idiotic destination is Peoria, IL. One of my co-workers flew there, even though it makes absolutely no sense, since that area is served out of MDW, with direct service pretty much everywhere. As for your runway delays at JFK due to our pesky RJs...well, you obviously have several additional hours on your hands for all that driving. What's an extra 20 minutes waiting to take off on your comfy WN 737 that doesn't even exist there? :rolleyes::rolleyes: |
This guy seems unduly obsessed with size: size of planes, size of cities, size of airports. I wonder.
|
I can certainly appreciate wanting to avoid RJs. I have broad shoulders so those narrow seats are terribly uncomfortable. The reason why I chose Delta over United (despite DEN being my home airport) was Delta flies Mad Dogs and A320s DEN-MSP (I've done that round trip weekly this year) while United usually has RJs.
I think it's absolutely ridiculous to think airlines should drop airports rather than use regional jets. Despite my preference for non-RJs, I absolutely love flying into and out of small airports like Orange County, Harrisburg and Green Bay. Being limited to LAX, MKE and PHL seems pretty stupid. |
Originally Posted by gooselee
(Post 24668273)
you need to reevaluate your sitting skills.
|
Originally Posted by adambisi
(Post 24668042)
You are way off.
26.5 million domestic passengers in BOS for 2014. MHT - 1.04 million (down 13% by the way) PVD - 1.79 million (down 7%) BDL - 2.91 million (up 8%)
Originally Posted by gooselee
(Post 24668273)
Cab LGA to/from Midtown = $30 and 20-45 mins
Cab from LGA to Woodside, then LIRR to Penn Station = $25 and 35 mins Cab from JFK to Manhattan = $65 and 1+ hour Airtrain + E train JFK to Manhattan = $10 and 1.5 hrs depending on where, exactly, you're going For those of us going places other than CT, LGA is generally a very nice option to have. Your personal circumstance is not the center of the universe, as you seem to imagine. Two other things: 1. You've never flown from LGA, so how do you know it's hard to get to? Have you ever tried? 2. Curious how you fly out of JFK all the time since it isn't even served by WN. By your logic, everyone should just fly to BWI, I guess, and then rent a car to drive to NYC. I fly out of JFK once in a blue moon, to chase cheap DL mainline tickets, but the airport itself is kind of miserable because of the DL-created congestion problem there. Getting to it from the CT shoreline is a breeze and a pleasurable experience. It's like $30 to get there (mostly MN, SLE is cheap, the subway is like $2.25 or whatever now) and there's free parking for as long as I need. I wasn't comparing JFK to just ATL. Please share your thoughts on ORD, DFW, LAX, PEK, DEN, CLT, LAS, IAH, LHR, CDG, fRA, AMS, IST, YYZ, SFO, PHX, and HND - all of which handle more annual departures than JFK. I stand corrected on MDW. However, WN's HQ is at DAL, which is what I was thinking. MCO ranks somewhat low...I suppose you're just speaking from your own myopic experience there, vs. actually doing any actual research, though. Speaking of research: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southwe...nes#Top_cities You do realize that without EAS, many of those small airports would close completely and cargo carriers would not have any place to land, right? I think you also deeply underestimate how much mail and cargo is carried every day on passenger planes, including express shipments that might not have several days to get trucked around. Wow. You really do think that people who live outside of big cities don't matter. The next time you're having a meal, try to think real hard about who is growing and raising the stuff you're eating and where they might live. I know it might be difficult, since you believe those places have no purpose, but please try. Your choices and lifestyle do not reduce the importance of anyone else in the world. Again, please explain why. If you are 6'3" standing and 6'1" sitting, you need to reevaluate your sitting skills. Again, you seem to have several hours of spare time each time you travel to spend driving to/from various destinations. So YOU can fly to MDW and YOU can rent a car and YOU can sit in it for however long it takes you to get to Peoria. For those of us without the luxury of that time, we will endure the RJs in your place to get there in a faster and safer manner. As for your runway delays at JFK due to our pesky RJs...well, you obviously have several additional hours on your hands for all that driving. What's an extra 20 minutes waiting to take off on your comfy WN 737 that doesn't even exist there?
Originally Posted by Sousaphil
(Post 24668803)
I think it's absolutely ridiculous to think airlines should drop airports rather than use regional jets. Despite my preference for non-RJs, I absolutely love flying into and out of small airports like Orange County, Harrisburg and Green Bay. Being limited to LAX, MKE and PHL seems pretty stupid.
|
I had some more responses in mind, but I'm short on time today so like OP, I'll just pick out the pieces of the conversation I feel like replying to:
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24671266)
What?
DCA should be sold for redevelopment. |
???
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24655848)
I'm 6'3", 250 lbs (working on getting that part down, but I'm still a tall dude). As a result, I cannot fly on the mini jets that Wisconsin Air, Chautauqua, ExpressJet or whatever regional airline partners they are using this year are flying around.
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24666184)
What's so funny? You can get to 46 of the 48 CONUS states with flysouthwest.com, and they are usually (although not always) the cheapest.
Just a reminder: Air travel stinks most of the time - only your attitude can make it better. :) |
Originally Posted by gooselee
(Post 24675250)
LOL. I think you just proved everyone else's point about how completely ridiculous and uninformed your thinking is. ^
Originally Posted by toolboxwi
(Post 24676180)
I can certainly confirm that I have had the "pleasure" of a seatmate on many a RJ flight that was larger than you are. But, thanks for leaving us with a little extra room by refusing to hop on one?? Not sure the horrible inconvenience of ducking while your forced to stand for the few minutes it takes to get on and off of the plane is worth this kind of rant.
Also, not sure why you feel the need to keep throwing out the Southwest website. We are all aware of what it is and I doubt any of us are rushing over to book a flight in the hopes we might score a seat next to you in the cattle car. Can't even imagine what a pleasant experience that would be...If you wouldn't mind posting your future travel plans so the rest of us can avoid those flights it would certainly be appreciated. That's all for now. I'm off to flysouthwest.com to book four more flights. Seriously. I am. $89 each way PVD-DTW. Cannot be beat. |
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24676446)
Actually I rethought that. It should be turned into green space, like a giant waterfront park, with just the terminal buildings redeveloped.
Because Southwest is awesome, at least compared to the other airlines. I wish we had a decent rail system so I could avoid flying within the CONUS at all. If you would like to fly in a premium cabin (which is often enjoyed by people who happen to have a larger frame) or actually leave the US and Caribbean (as many people whose worlds are not centered around PVD often do), WN most certainly can be "beat". |
Many of us in Central Illinois would like to thank Southwest for eliminating service for us not once but twice. First, when they took on the ATA routes that eliminated our connections to MDW and second for eliminating the our airports formerly served by AirTran. I'm glad somebody likes Southwest, but it ain't me! I'm not driving (or paying the fortune to park) in Chicago since it would never save me any money. If I want cheap I'll fly Allegiant, but I have no desire to fly them either.
Airports like Peoria (home of Caterpillar) Bloomington (home of State Farm) and Moline (home of John Deere) serve me well. Thank God for regional airports!! |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.