717 headroom
I'm 6'3", 250 lbs (working on getting that part down, but I'm still a tall dude). As a result, I cannot fly on the mini jets that Wisconsin Air, Chautauqua, ExpressJet or whatever regional airline partners they are using this year are flying around. I normally fly WN as a result, since they also give decent legroom, avoid the assigned seating BS, fly all mainline, are all-Boeing and all-737, and provide my area with more mainline service than anyone else with all full-sized Boeing 737's. I can fly on DL's normal mainline fleet (A319, A320, MD-88, MD-90, etc) if I can't find a decent price or time on WN, although I try to avoid DL like the plague.
What I can't figure out is if I will fit on DL's ex-AirTran 717 fleet. I know this fleet is mainline, but the physical airframes aren't clearly a real jet (B737, A319, MD-80 or larger), or a mini jet (CRJ, Embraer, etc). They are sort of in a weird in-between. Will I fit on one? I'm 6'3", so I need at least 6'4" of headroom to fit in a given airframe and be able to stretch my back and arms out. Between business and personal, I just took 4 737 flights, and I'm taking 9 more between AS and WN. Hopefully I can book the additional 4 on WN and avoid 2 on DL, but even if I can avoid DL, I'd still like to know if I can go on a 717 for future reference. I go to DTW fairly often from PVD or BDL, so at some point, the direct flight on DL might make more sense than bouncing through BWI or MDW on WN. |
The 717 is essentially a shortened (in length) MD90 (the 717 was called the MD95 before Boeing merged with McDonell Douglas). The MD-90 is essentially an MD88 with upgrades. If you've been in a MD88 or MD90, you'll be fine.
|
Originally Posted by diburning
(Post 24655888)
The 717 is essentially a shortened (in length) MD90 (the 717 was called the MD95 before Boeing merged with McDonell Douglas). The MD-90 is essentially an MD88 with upgrades. If you've been in a MD88 or MD90, you'll be fine.
|
the 717 has quickly become my favorite delta jet to fly on domestically.
It is small enough that it does not feel too crowded, yet is a full mainline jet. The fact that they were all recently picked up and renovated is a big plus. |
The 717s are a wonderful plane as stated above. As they are were all recently acquired by DL, the interiors are some of the nicest in the fleet, at least for now.
|
Originally Posted by diburning
(Post 24655888)
If you've been in a MD88 or MD90, or DC-9, you'll be fine.
|
Originally Posted by maksimfa
(Post 24656661)
the 717 has quickly become my favorite delta jet to fly on domestically.
It is small enough that it does not feel too crowded, yet is a full mainline jet. The fact that they were all recently picked up and renovated is a big plus. |
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24659681)
Nice! Well it's good to know that if I do get stuck on DL at some point, I can expect a halfway decent experience on the 717 fleet.
The other positive is that the seat is an inch wider than a 707, 727, 737, and 757. |
Originally Posted by SJC ORD LDR
(Post 24660542)
DC9 = MD80 = MD90 = 717
The other positive is that the seat is an inch wider than a 707, 727, 737, and 757. |
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24660572)
Are the seats crammed an inch closer together like the rest of their planes?
|
Originally Posted by SJC ORD LDR
(Post 24660756)
According to seatguru, it's 31". I've only been in F, C+, and 21A or E, which have no seat in front of it. So, I find the plane very comfy.
|
717 headroom
I guess I'm confused. I'm 6'7 and can "fit" easily on the Skywest/Compass birds that are flying in and out of Seattle. . Even if I need to snag a comfort plus seat, I still have plenty of room. In fact, if I had my choice between Compass and a A319, id take the compass trip every time.
|
Originally Posted by aviatorzz
(Post 24661598)
I guess I'm confused. I'm 6'7 and can "fit" easily on the Skywest/Compass birds that are flying in and out of Seattle. . Even if I need to snag a comfort plus seat, I still have plenty of room. In fact, if I had my choice between Compass and a A319, id take the compass trip every time.
I can usually avoid DL entirely. WN serves the entire CONUS now plus some (DCA and BOS, really?), although their times or prices occasionally don't work. IIRC, ATL was the last CONUS market WN didn't get into for obvious reasons, but they are there now. It's no wonder that WN is the largest domestic airline now. |
Originally Posted by BiggAW
(Post 24662544)
It pisses me off that DL has their regional partners flying tiny little planes I don't fit in (so do United, USAir, and American), while WN flies B737's everywhere. DL should just get rid of the regional partners entirely and fly all mainline.
It's no wonder that WN is the largest domestic airline now. Southwest isn't the largest domestic airline now, and never has been. A common measure for airline size is Revenue Passenger Miles. Southwest has big domestic passenger counts but on shorter average distances. American and Delta both had more domestic RPMs than Southwest for 2014. Systemwide, American, Delta and United are nearly twice Southwest's size American, Delta, and United use (or overuse) regional carriers and smaller aircraft to serve (in aggregate) hundreds of cities that Southwest doesn't. Worldwide destination count: AA, 'nearly 350' DL, 321 United, 373 Southwest, 93 You can't even imagine the dozens of U.S. cities that would lose scheduled commercial airline service entirely if no carrier flew anything smaller than a 737. I appreciate your preference for mainline operations but your view of the industry and its economics is fully decades (and I mean decades, as in pre- 1978 deregulation) out of date. |
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
(Post 24662836)
Southwest isn't the largest domestic airline now, and never has been. A common measure for airline size is Revenue Passenger Miles. Southwest has big domestic passenger counts but on shorter average distances. American and Delta both had more domestic RPMs than Southwest for 2014. Systemwide, American, Delta and United are nearly twice Southwest's size
American, Delta, and United use (or overuse) regional carriers and smaller aircraft to serve (in aggregate) hundreds of cities that Southwest doesn't. Worldwide destination count: You can't even imagine the dozens of U.S. cities that would lose scheduled commercial airline service entirely if no carrier flew anything smaller than a 737. I appreciate your preference for mainline operations but your view of the industry and its economics is fully decades (and I mean decades, as in pre- 1978 deregulation) out of date. I am very familiar with the northeast and Michigan, since I go out there often to see family. WN serves the entire state from DTW, GRR, and FNT. Delta has something like 11 or 12 airports in MI, even though only a couple of them actually get mainline service. There is no reason to have service to Alpena, MI or Pellston, MI. I've driven by the Pellston airport, it's a JOKE. That area is served out of DTW via I-75, or TVC in the summer with mainline service. The UP doesn't have any mainline service, so maybe in a more efficient model, they would keep TVC running with mainline service year round to serve the UP and the upper part of the LP. DL serves Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket, neither of which should have any air service. There is a boat that goes there. They have service to White Plains, which should not have commercial service, they are served by EWR, JFK, and LGA. If Delta would get rid of their regional flights and fly all 717's and larger, they would have enough slots at JFK to consolidate their LGA, JFK, and EWR operations together into JFK, and still cut the total number of flights in and out of there significantly. Somebody (not DL) flies into HVN in New Haven, CT, another city which should not have commercial service. I live very near this areas, and it is already served by mainline service BDL, PVD, LGA, and JFK. I personally have used BDL, PVD, BOS, and JFK to fly out of this area. I see 7 or 8 cities that can be consolidated into the existing mainline operations at ATL. I could go on all day. Their model is an inefficient mess, and because all their little mini-jets are clogging up the runways at JFK, JFK is a congested mess that's out of capacity. If they banned all planes with less than 143 seats from JFK, it's congestion problems would be instantly solved, and it could serve more passengers and more foreign airlines while reducing the number of takeoff/landing slots to give some breathing room. The A319 is 156, and the 737-700 is 143, both the babies in their families. Even if you let 717's in at 117 seats, the capacity problems would still be fixed, although from a system perspective, they should be sent to routes out of DTW and ATL, and only the higher capacity planes allowed in congested eastern airports like JFK. Look at MDW. It's WN's big hub, and it's just not very congested, unlike O'Hare or JFK or any other big hub with a legacy airline that has a ton of regional flights coming in and out, and they are a mess. MDW handles a metric crapload of people with little congestion on the runway. O'Hare has 3.5x the number of takeoffs and landings, but only 2.5x the number of people. Those statistics would likely reverse if regional airlines weren't allowed into O'hare, and the smallest plane there was a 737, with 747's, 777's, and the like bringing the per-plane passenger average up. The fact of the matter is that most people don't use the airports without multiple commercial mainline carriers, because without multiple commercial mainline carriers, the prices are too high anyway. So the country would be much better served by eliminating the regional system. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 6:24 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.