Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Handling of comfort+ seats vacated by those upgraded to F

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Handling of comfort+ seats vacated by those upgraded to F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2015, 10:55 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: CVG
Programs: DL GM, Marriott Silver, SPG P+
Posts: 33
Handling of comfort+ seats vacated by those upgraded to F

I recognize this as a long standing problem, but I am wondering if there is a "rule" for how gate agents are supposed to handle this:

When someone with an EC/comfort+ seat gets upgraded to F, I've never seen the vacated seat go to another person on the upgrade list. Instead, I've watched time after time someone be cleared off the standby list into the EC seat.

Now that the comfort+ seats get better in-flight amenities like booze and the snack basket (instead of just a modestly more comfortable seat), coupled with the T-24 rule on GM booking these seats for free, this is really starting to irritate me.

It seems like they should sequentially run upgrades for the two different upgraded cabins, and THEN process the standby list. Am I nuts? It sure doesn't seem like that's what happens.
heldicus is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 11:04 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: BDU
Programs: DL:MM, Marriott:LTT
Posts: 8,779
Remember, there is a good chance the first few people cleared from the UG list are D/P/GM who could not SDC but instead SB.
CJKatl is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 11:14 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SLC
Programs: DL DM 1MM, UA 1K, Marriott Lifetime Titanium Elite, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 32
Originally Posted by heldicus
I recognize this as a long standing problem, but I am wondering if there is a "rule" for how gate agents are supposed to handle this:

When someone with an EC/comfort+ seat gets upgraded to F, I've never seen the vacated seat go to another person on the upgrade list. Instead, I've watched time after time someone be cleared off the standby list into the EC seat.
This isn't exactly a new problem. I'm not sure whether you're saying it's a continuation or something new/exacerbated by the March 1 rule.

Originally Posted by heldicus
Now that the comfort+ seats get better in-flight amenities like booze and the snack basket (instead of just a modestly more comfortable seat), coupled with the T-24 rule on GM booking these seats for free, this is really starting to irritate me.
GMs can book in at T-72. FO is at T-24.

Originally Posted by heldicus
It seems like they should sequentially run upgrades for the two different upgraded cabins, and THEN process the standby list. Am I nuts? It sure doesn't seem like that's what happens.
Provided you're a qualified for the C+ seat, the GAs handle this, I think, just as any seat change request. If you talk to the GA prior to them clearing the UG list and ask them politely if you could get an C+ seat during the process of clearing UGs and standby PAX I don't see why they wouldn't attempt to accommodate you if there is time to do so. Only situations in which I could see where they may not would be if the flight is completely full or going to be delayed and they just let the computer put people on the standby list into the remaining seats.
404flyer is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 11:46 am
  #4  
TTT
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 45° North
Programs: DL DM MM, HH Diamond
Posts: 10,196
Originally Posted by heldicus
It seems like they should sequentially run upgrades for the two different upgraded cabins, and THEN process the standby list. Am I nuts? It sure doesn't seem like that's what happens.
I understand your point, but lets say I am a DM who didn't get upgraded nor did I get a C+ seat but I did get an Exit Aisle. If I was automatically moved into a middle C+ I don't think I would be very happy.

There are too many what-ifs when having the automated process. It isn't like the upgrade list to F where it is generally accepted that F is better than any seat in Y. There are seats in Main Cabin that are better than some seats in C+ to at least some of the passengers on the plane.
TTT is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 11:58 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: BDL/HPN/JFK/FLL
Programs: DL Diamond Ham Sandwich
Posts: 1,051
Originally Posted by CJKatl
Remember, there is a good chance the first few people cleared from the UG list are D/P/GM who could not SDC but instead SB.
How did they even get on the UG list if they SB'd?
mother- is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 12:00 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: CVG
Programs: DL GM, Marriott Silver, SPG P+
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by TTT
I understand your point, but lets say I am a DM who didn't get upgraded nor did I get a C+ seat but I did get an Exit Aisle. If I was automatically moved into a middle C+ I don't think I would be very happy.

There are too many what-ifs when having the automated process. It isn't like the upgrade list to F where it is generally accepted that F is better than any seat in Y. There are seats in Main Cabin that are better than some seats in C+ to at least some of the passengers on the plane.
Very fair counterpoint, but I've seen people refuse their F upgrade in order to remain in the back with a companion. I'd think that anyone could refuse the bump up to C+ if they had a more desirable seat in hand.
heldicus is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 12:04 pm
  #7  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: CVG
Programs: DL GM, Marriott Silver, SPG P+
Posts: 33
Originally Posted by mother-
How did they even get on the UG list if they SB'd?
they meant cleared from the standby list, I assume. And that's true of course, medallions are going to come off the standby list into vacated C+ seats. But they don't have a more legitimate claim to those seats than other medallions who were already confirmed on the flight. Arguably less so.
heldicus is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 12:12 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NYC, MSY
Programs: DL DM, 1.5MM, NEXUS, Sky Club Lifetime, Admirals Club Lifetime, LowValueCustomer everywhere
Posts: 6,447
Originally Posted by TTT
I understand your point, but lets say I am a DM who didn't get upgraded nor did I get a C+ seat but I did get an Exit Aisle. If I was automatically moved into a middle C+ I don't think I would be very happy.

There are too many what-ifs when having the automated process. It isn't like the upgrade list to F where it is generally accepted that F is better than any seat in Y. There are seats in Main Cabin that are better than some seats in C+ to at least some of the passengers on the plane.
+1

Also, You're really looking at this from a narrow viewpoint. As TTT pointed out, there are many people who don't want their seat changed for a variety of reasons.
The Upgrade Standby List is prioritized on the basis of passenger status codes (46 when I last checked) and time stamps which go far beyond Medallion Status. It really isn't an option to integrate all Medallions who aren't already in F or C+ into the list. There's also no option for someone to opt out and certainly none for saying (as you probably would), "I'd like a C+ seat if one becomes available, but not a center."
It really is impossible for a GA who's trying to get a flight out on schedule, to take on the complexities involved. The numbers also get crazy. For example, the early red-eye SFO-ATL had 2 Medallions get UG's out of 40+ on the UG Standby List. There were then another 50 or so the Standby List, including 40 non-rev's (announced by the GA who wanted them to pay attention to having their manes called).
The GA's deserve great credit for getting the flight out on time AND, everyone on the Standby List Cleared. I don't think they'd have been too amenable to "I'd like a C+ seat if one becomes available, but not a center".
SuperG1955 is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 12:28 pm
  #9  
Suspended
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: NYC
Programs: DL Diamond, AAdvantage EXP, Hyatt Explorist, HHonors Diamond, Avis First
Posts: 7,344
non-revs most likely will get the vacated C+ seats, especially if there isn't much time as gate agents will start clearing the standby list after UPG list.
AANYC1981 is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 12:55 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Minneapolis and Phoenix-2 weeks per month each
Programs: Delta DM, MM
Posts: 477
When not in F or in EC, I make a point of asking the gate agent for any vacated EC seat. I have never been turned down.
FC flyer is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 1:00 pm
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Once boarding has ocurred, the less movement the better. Closing the flight and an ontime push are the #1 priority.

If the relevant pax have not yet boarded, it's fine to ask the GA for a C+ seat from whatever inventory is created by UG's.
Often1 is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 1:45 pm
  #12  
Original Member and FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Kansas City, MO, USA
Programs: DL PM/MM, AA ExPlat, Hyatt Glob, HH Dia, National ECE, Hertz PC
Posts: 16,579
Originally Posted by AANYC1981
non-revs most likely will get the vacated C+ seats, especially if there isn't much time as gate agents will start clearing the standby list after UPG list.
What makes you think that they will go to non-revs and not whoever is at the top of the standby list, or are you equating those who clear at the top of the standby list with non-revs?
Beckles is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 2:00 pm
  #13  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Just relocated to Phoenix, so I guess that does it for Delta for me
Programs: DL "Annual" GM 2MM, AA lifetime Gold 1MM, Hilton Gold, Hertz President's Club
Posts: 337
In the past what I've done is check the seat chart on my Delta app every few minutes as they started clearing UG's. When an EC seat opened up (other than a middle), I'd ask the GA for the specific seat. If there was a big line I couldn't do that, but it worked several times. Now I don't know what I can do. First of all, I think all the T-72, T-48 and T-24 for C+ is bogus, since with FCM most FC upgrades don't clear at the windows and don't happen until T-30 at the gate. At that time many C+ seats may open, but I don't know how the GA's are going to deal with all these people eligible for upgrades and eligible for C+ and be fair about rationing C+. I think DL is digging a hole they may not be able to get out of.
lovecabo is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 2:13 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NYC, MD, LA
Programs: Delta-DM, United, Hilton-DM, SPG-PLTM
Posts: 462
I agree with asking the Gate Agent.

If I don't clear for the Upgrade and happen to be in a seat less desirable I always approach the gate agent prior to boarding and politely ask that if a better seat comes up if they would mind changing me.

They have always obliged.
QDDawg is offline  
Old Mar 4, 2015, 2:21 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: MSP
Programs: Delta PM, United Silver, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Exec Elite
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by heldicus
I recognize this as a long standing problem, but I am wondering if there is a "rule" for how gate agents are supposed to handle this:

When someone with an EC/comfort+ seat gets upgraded to F, I've never seen the vacated seat go to another person on the upgrade list. Instead, I've watched time after time someone be cleared off the standby list into the EC seat.

Now that the comfort+ seats get better in-flight amenities like booze and the snack basket (instead of just a modestly more comfortable seat), coupled with the T-24 rule on GM booking these seats for free, this is really starting to irritate me.

It seems like they should sequentially run upgrades for the two different upgraded cabins, and THEN process the standby list. Am I nuts? It sure doesn't seem like that's what happens.
In the rare case I am already not in an EC or now EC+, once upgrades are complete I pull up the seat map on the app. If the seat opens I will move or go to the GA to then get moved.
BigDawg23 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.