FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta-air-lines-skymiles-665/)
-   -   More E class on the way? (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/delta-air-lines-skymiles/1620865-more-e-class-way.html)

EZEDoesIt Oct 15, 2014 1:43 pm

More E class on the way?
 
Just checked ATL-AUS/SAT to see if DL is matching the current WN sale. Sure enough they are ... with E fares. V is $50+ more r/t. Anyone finding E on other non-leisure routes?

hazelrah Oct 15, 2014 1:46 pm


Originally Posted by EZEDoesIt (Post 23682442)
Just checked ATL-AUS/SAT to see if DL is matching the current WN sale. Sure enough they are ... with E fares. V is $50+ more r/t. Anyone finding E on other non-leisure routes?

Yeah!, more E middle seats.Why not just cut out the middle-man and fly Southwest or Spirit.

jkatzen Oct 15, 2014 2:24 pm

Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:

  • 100% unchangeable (even with fee) vs. 100% changeable, for only a fare difference
  • No included baggage vs. 2 included bags each way
  • No advanced seat assignment, with only the dregs left after everyone else picks (vs SWA's no-advanced-seat-assignment for everyone, putting all on even footing)

Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either.

I guess you earn miles . . .

HDQDD Oct 15, 2014 2:29 pm

Perhaps it's the markets I fly to/from, but I've never even seen an E fare offered.

To be fair, I usually only book a week or so in advance.

xliioper Oct 15, 2014 2:54 pm

The initial markets are listed at the URL below. DTW-ERI is a bit of an oddball (no LCC/ULCC's and probably not much O&D).

http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_...-economy-.html

I'm also seeing them on DTW-DFW and DTW-IAH (Spirit routes) even though they are not listed on the webpage.

E fares generally require a 3 week advance purchase and a Saturday night stay for a number of markets. Also only available on non-stop routings.

3Cforme Oct 15, 2014 3:14 pm

Interesting find by the OP.

Lots of city pairs don't have published fares all the way through the most-deeply discounted fare buckets. One might think they could keep one bucket above E (V or X) for time-limited promo/match fares.

jrl767 Oct 15, 2014 3:14 pm


Originally Posted by jkatzen (Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
...
I guess you earn miles . . .

you may have answered your own question

Profchemnerd Oct 15, 2014 3:15 pm


Originally Posted by jkatzen (Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:

  • 100% unchangeable (even with fee) vs. 100% changeable, for only a fare difference
  • No included baggage vs. 2 included bags each way
  • No advanced seat assignment, with only the dregs left after everyone else picks (vs SWA's no-advanced-seat-assignment for everyone, putting all on even footing)

Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either.

I guess you earn miles . . .

I agree completely. Also, with WN, you can pay the extra $10 or whatever it is now to get priority boarding, so you basically get your choice of seat and can often score an exit row.

Often1 Oct 15, 2014 3:17 pm

Corporate discounts for the employer and miles for the sucker (I mean employee).

HDQDD Oct 15, 2014 5:11 pm


Originally Posted by jkatzen (Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:

  • 100% unchangeable (even with fee) vs. 100% changeable, for only a fare difference
  • No included baggage vs. 2 included bags each way
  • No advanced seat assignment, with only the dregs left after everyone else picks (vs SWA's no-advanced-seat-assignment for everyone, putting all on even footing)

Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either.

+1. DL shouldn't have even wasted the resources to come up with E fares.

WIRunner Oct 15, 2014 5:18 pm


Originally Posted by jkatzen (Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:

  • 100% unchangeable (even with fee) vs. 100% changeable, for only a fare difference
  • No included baggage vs. 2 included bags each way
  • No advanced seat assignment, with only the dregs left after everyone else picks (vs SWA's no-advanced-seat-assignment for everyone, putting all on even footing)

Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either.

I guess you earn miles . . .

For a frequent flyer, these are horrible to purchase. But for someone who is 1, on a budget and just wants the cheapest flight, or 2, doesn't care. It will appeal to them. DL isn't necessarily going after the high roller here, but that causal flier that would normally choose WN, or whatever the cheapest that shows up in Travelocity. They're not going to care about changes, and they're already going to pay for bags, the seat assignments might be an issue for them though.

19103_aa Oct 15, 2014 6:55 pm

E flights should be avoided by any DL frequent flyer. You can't book into Economy Comfort and on the one occasion I made the mistake of buying this fare, my upgrade was not processed correctly. Silvers were sitting in F while I sat in a middle seat in Y.

flyerCO Oct 15, 2014 7:02 pm


Originally Posted by PHLbuddy (Post 23683941)
E flights should be avoided by any DL frequent flyer. You can't book into Economy Comfort and on the one occasion I made the mistake of buying this fare, my upgrade was not processed correctly. Silvers were sitting in F while I sat in a middle seat in Y.

I thought E fares only got upgraded after all others had been upgraded. Not 100% sure on it though, but I thought there was some strange rule in regards to upgrades.

Often1 Oct 15, 2014 7:27 pm


Originally Posted by WIRunner (Post 23683543)
For a frequent flyer, these are horrible to purchase. But for someone who is 1, on a budget and just wants the cheapest flight, or 2, doesn't care. It will appeal to them. DL isn't necessarily going after the high roller here, but that causal flier that would normally choose WN, or whatever the cheapest that shows up in Travelocity. They're not going to care about changes, and they're already going to pay for bags, the seat assignments might be an issue for them though.

+1 - People get all hot and bothered that these fares exist. But, the bottom line is that there is a market for these seats, nobody is twisting anybody's arm to buy them and it's highly unlikely that in the low-roller market, people are calculating in the risk of changes and the like.

Air Houston Oct 15, 2014 7:36 pm


Originally Posted by Often1 (Post 23684067)
+1 - People get all hot and bothered that these fares exist. But, the bottom line is that there is a market for these seats, nobody is twisting anybody's arm to buy them and it's highly unlikely that in the low-roller market, people are calculating in the risk of changes and the like.

If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?

mridley2 Oct 15, 2014 7:47 pm


Originally Posted by HDQDD (Post 23683512)
+1. DL shouldn't have even wasted the resources to come up with E fares.

Clearly... It's a step in the direction of cheaper fares having less benefits even to medallion travelers. The new language on the web site about "full medallion benefits" for economy fares clearly indicates delta will move to restricted benefits on the cheapest economy fares. Remember back when a T fare was the cheapest.?? Now we have V & X. There was a lot more to that move than a supposed fare class alignment with Sky Team. I call BS.

Friday I'm flying on a U fare and feel like a big spender. Haha. No upgrade yet. 14 of 16 seats are open. As usual theses days.

19103_aa Oct 15, 2014 7:47 pm


Originally Posted by flyerCO (Post 23683970)
I thought E fares only got upgraded after all others had been upgraded. Not 100% sure on it though, but I thought there was some strange rule in regards to upgrades.

After my inquiry, @DeltaAssist indicated there was an error with the processing and applied the upgrade request manually. The point is, there is something funky about these fares and medallion upgrades. Buyer beware.

WIRunner Oct 15, 2014 7:54 pm


Originally Posted by Air Houston (Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?

The better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it to be booked. I couldn't get one to price via our online TA (which is travelocity based). Also, cost or not, we have always required fares to be changeable. That alone would be enough reason to book up to a T or V fare.

If any of you are like me, much of my travel is booked within 14 days. Will these even price at that short of a time frame? Our buy up minimum miles to first is ridiculously low, but the few times that I haven't been able to get into F, I've been finding myself in Y, B, M or K.

MSP_Monopoly Oct 15, 2014 9:10 pm

Are the MSP routes new for E fares? I fly to LAS and FLL often and DL never has cheap fares on these routes. They have never attempted to compete with Spirit on these routes before. That I've seen anyways.

I would love to see some cheap fares to FLL this winter. And LAS for that matter.

ramolnar Oct 15, 2014 10:28 pm


Originally Posted by WIRunner (Post 23684169)
The better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it to be booked. I couldn't get one to price via our online TA (which is travelocity based). Also, cost or not, we have always required fares to be changeable. That alone would be enough reason to book up to a T or V fare.

The yet better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it NOT to be booked? I just found out that I received an E fare on ATL-SAT. The agency site I used had no information of the lack of seat assignment. To the contrary, it showed the plane and I picked aisle seats. I only found out about the E when I went to Delta's site.

Cheapest fare is cheapest fare, even if it's only $8 less than a V fare for my exact same flight. I'll pay $4 each way for an aisle seat, if I can figure out how to do it. Or maybe I can just wear a scarlet E on my clothing.

mridley2 Oct 15, 2014 10:45 pm


Originally Posted by ramolnar (Post 23684679)
Or maybe I can just wear a scarlet E on my clothing.

That was good for a laugh. For 2016 medallions delta should print your prior year MQDs in Big bold letters on your medallion card. Maybe that's why they removed the bar codes a couple years back. Make room for MQD space.

Then. All passengers board the plan based on MQD spend rather than zones or class. Remember lining up in grade school by height. Well delta has a modern take on that ordering of pax.

EZEDoesIt Oct 16, 2014 8:32 am


Originally Posted by ramolnar (Post 23684679)
The yet better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it NOT to be booked? I just found out that I received an E fare on ATL-SAT.

I haven't verified it myself, but I'm guessing that many travel sites probably aren't coded to know that E is substantially different than all other fares and will offer it.

MSPeconomist Oct 16, 2014 9:14 am


Originally Posted by jkatzen (Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:

  • 100% unchangeable (even with fee) vs. 100% changeable, for only a fare difference
  • No included baggage vs. 2 included bags each way
  • No advanced seat assignment, with only the dregs left after everyone else picks (vs SWA's no-advanced-seat-assignment for everyone, putting all on even footing)

Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either.

I guess you earn miles . . .

I don't buy E fares either, but some of us just don't want to fly Southwest: different airports/terminals (i.e., Humphrey at MSP, MDW rather than ORD, etc.), more connections (exMSP), no lounges, no advanced seat assignments, no interlining, bad IROPs handling, lots of families with kids, party flights, FAs telling jokes, playing games and otherwise annoying passengers on the intercom, no FC,......maybe more that I'm missing but for flights of this length, I really don't care that much about the FF miles (although I would have no use for the WN companion pass system to award their elites).

Perhaps my view is partly shaped by seeing a few episodes of the old Southwest airlines reality show on cable TV that seemed to always show overbooked flights, lost and damaged luggage, and unhappy passengers while WN staff enjoyed their parties and played games on board.

hazelrah Oct 16, 2014 9:37 am


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 23686664)
I
Perhaps my view is partly shaped by seeing a few episodes of the old Southwest airlines reality show on cable TV that seemed to always show overbooked flights, lost and damaged luggage, and unhappy passengers while WN staff enjoyed their parties and played games on board.

HAHA basing your opinion on a TV show? You do realize that TV shows are based on the ludicrous, exaggeration, fantasy and drama?

Perhaps you should actually give WN a try and then you could have an opinion based on reality ;)

TTT Oct 16, 2014 9:55 am


Originally Posted by Air Houston (Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?


Originally Posted by WIRunner (Post 23684169)
The better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it to be booked. I couldn't get one to price via our online TA (which is travelocity based). Also, cost or not, we have always required fares to be changeable. That alone would be enough reason to book up to a T or V fare.

I was surprised that my corporate TA allowed one to be booked. We used to use Concur and that specifically had logic in the search that excluded E fares. Our new booking tool (internal) does not have that logic.

The problem I see with corporations booking this is the lack of residual value of the ticket. If travel plans change at the last minute for the employee no changes/no cancellations can become costly.

Often1 Oct 16, 2014 10:49 am


Originally Posted by Air Houston (Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?

How so? You don't like the terms of your employment, whether it's salary, benefits or work conditions (including travel), you leave.

Or, put another way, arm twisting is a made up term.

HongKonger Oct 16, 2014 11:09 am


Originally Posted by Air Houston (Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?

No, it would be considered cornh**ing. Are we allowed to use that word on FT?

xliioper Oct 16, 2014 11:22 am


Originally Posted by TTT (Post 23686903)
I was surprised that my corporate TA allowed one to be booked. We used to use Concur and that specifically had logic in the search that excluded E fares. Our new booking tool (internal) does not have that logic.

The problem I see with corporations booking this is the lack of residual value of the ticket. If travel plans change at the last minute for the employee no changes/no cancellations can become costly.

Most of the E fares I have seen are in the $200 - $300 range (often closer to $200). Even if they were changeable, there wouldn't be much residual value after the $200 domestic change fee.

MSPeconomist Oct 16, 2014 11:23 am


Originally Posted by hazelrah (Post 23686796)
HAHA basing your opinion on a TV show? You do realize that TV shows are based on the ludicrous, exaggeration, fantasy and drama?

Perhaps you should actually give WN a try and then you could have an opinion based on reality ;)

I don't need to fly WN to know that I want flights with nonstops from MSP departing from the main terminal, FC, reserved seats, airport lounges,fewer kids on average, interlining and IROPs rebooking on other carriers, and FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.

hazelrah Oct 16, 2014 11:42 am


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 23687432)
FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.

You're certainly entitled to your opinon, and all those things you mentioned are self-evident, but you really are showing your lack of bona fides with this last comment.

It's clear you don't know in this respect, having never even flown them and are relying on a cartoonish version. The jokes are much diminished if at all (i don't even remember any jokes my last trip) , and no games either.

TTT Oct 16, 2014 11:52 am


Originally Posted by LBJ (Post 23687427)
Most of the E fares I have seen are in the $200 - $300 range (often closer to $200). Even if they were changeable, there wouldn't be much residual value after the $200 domestic change fee.

That's a good point. You're right - not much value left in that case.

emrdoc Oct 16, 2014 11:54 am


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 23687432)
I don't need to fly WN to know that I want flights with nonstops from MSP departing from the main terminal, FC, reserved seats, airport lounges,fewer kids on average, interlining and IROPs rebooking on other carriers, and FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.

Whats wrong with kids? No kids = no future

EZEDoesIt Oct 16, 2014 12:02 pm

I don't fly often, but when I do, I prefer flights without baby goats.

HongKonger Oct 16, 2014 12:13 pm


Originally Posted by emrdoc (Post 23687604)
Whats wrong with kids? No kids = no future

She hates children but won't fly private to avoid them.

HongKonger Oct 16, 2014 12:14 pm


Originally Posted by EZEDoesIt (Post 23687662)
I don't fly often, but when I do, I prefer flights without baby goats.

No kidding, they take all the goat's milk from the beverage carts and there hasn't been enough of it catered lately to begin with.

MSPeconomist Oct 16, 2014 12:18 pm


Originally Posted by HongKonger (Post 23687731)
She hates children but won't fly private to avoid them.

I hate badly behaved children on planes and in airport, hotels, and restaurants. Fewer kids on board means fewer badly behaved kids on average unless we want to get into whether certain carriers have a higher incidence of bad behavior per child passenger.

3Cforme Oct 16, 2014 12:26 pm


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 23687432)
I don't need to fly WN to know that I want flights with nonstops from MSP departing from the main terminal, FC, reserved seats, airport lounges,fewer kids on average, interlining and IROPs rebooking on other carriers, and FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.

You've given this some thought! :D

A few years back an AA exec observed for attribution that most people on the plane weren't accruing miles in any program, let alone AAdvantage, and certainly not carrying elite status. (AA was no slouch in promoting FF plans, either.) In that environment, an E fare doesn't forego much: those flyers weren't upgrade-eligible, they probably weren't priority boarding-eligible (CC benefit noted), MQDs mean nothing.

I don't think for a minute that DL's choice of city pairs for E fares is random - I think DL is trying to figure out just what it needs to offer at what price points to compete with WN, Spirit and Allegiant. WN has been strong in Texas from day 1 and ATL-SAT/AUS are good test routes. On-time performance, frequency, and network depth may be enough, even without seat assignments.

MSPeconomist Oct 16, 2014 12:45 pm


Originally Posted by emrdoc (Post 23687604)
Whats wrong with kids? No kids = no future

To paraphrase a frequent refrain here:

WKBK (want kids buy kids, or maybe breed kids would be more accurate).

hazelrah Oct 16, 2014 12:59 pm


Originally Posted by 3Cforme (Post 23687829)
I don't think for a minute that DL's choice of city pairs for E fares is random - I think DL is trying to figure out just what it needs to offer at what price points to compete with WN, Spirit and Allegiant. WN has been strong in Texas from day 1 and ATL-SAT/AUS are good test routes. On-time performance, frequency, and network depth may be enough, even without seat assignments.

An inferior product is still an inferior product- 1) Changes permitted on WN (can be no charge) , 2) and free luggage on WN. Pop the EB small fee on and you'll have a good seat and more than likely board ahead of families.

I'm airline agnostic these days and happily purchase WN and DL, even Allegiant alike, but an "e" fare as an inferior product is not even on my radar screen. I haven't sat in a middle seat in 14 years and don't intend to in the future.

emrdoc Oct 16, 2014 2:12 pm


Originally Posted by MSPeconomist (Post 23687768)
I hate badly behaved children on planes and in airport, hotels, and restaurants. Fewer kids on board means fewer badly behaved kids on average unless we want to get into whether certain carriers have a higher incidence of bad behavior per child passenger.

Wow...I bet you are a joy when meeting kids. :(

They are kids...chill out.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.