![]() |
More E class on the way?
Just checked ATL-AUS/SAT to see if DL is matching the current WN sale. Sure enough they are ... with E fares. V is $50+ more r/t. Anyone finding E on other non-leisure routes?
|
Originally Posted by EZEDoesIt
(Post 23682442)
Just checked ATL-AUS/SAT to see if DL is matching the current WN sale. Sure enough they are ... with E fares. V is $50+ more r/t. Anyone finding E on other non-leisure routes?
|
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either. I guess you earn miles . . . |
Perhaps it's the markets I fly to/from, but I've never even seen an E fare offered.
To be fair, I usually only book a week or so in advance. |
The initial markets are listed at the URL below. DTW-ERI is a bit of an oddball (no LCC/ULCC's and probably not much O&D).
http://www.delta.com/content/www/en_...-economy-.html I'm also seeing them on DTW-DFW and DTW-IAH (Spirit routes) even though they are not listed on the webpage. E fares generally require a 3 week advance purchase and a Saturday night stay for a number of markets. Also only available on non-stop routings. |
Interesting find by the OP.
Lots of city pairs don't have published fares all the way through the most-deeply discounted fare buckets. One might think they could keep one bucket above E (V or X) for time-limited promo/match fares. |
Originally Posted by jkatzen
(Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
... I guess you earn miles . . . |
Originally Posted by jkatzen
(Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either. I guess you earn miles . . . |
Corporate discounts for the employer and miles for the sucker (I mean employee).
|
Originally Posted by jkatzen
(Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either. |
Originally Posted by jkatzen
(Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either. I guess you earn miles . . . |
E flights should be avoided by any DL frequent flyer. You can't book into Economy Comfort and on the one occasion I made the mistake of buying this fare, my upgrade was not processed correctly. Silvers were sitting in F while I sat in a middle seat in Y.
|
Originally Posted by PHLbuddy
(Post 23683941)
E flights should be avoided by any DL frequent flyer. You can't book into Economy Comfort and on the one occasion I made the mistake of buying this fare, my upgrade was not processed correctly. Silvers were sitting in F while I sat in a middle seat in Y.
|
Originally Posted by WIRunner
(Post 23683543)
For a frequent flyer, these are horrible to purchase. But for someone who is 1, on a budget and just wants the cheapest flight, or 2, doesn't care. It will appeal to them. DL isn't necessarily going after the high roller here, but that causal flier that would normally choose WN, or whatever the cheapest that shows up in Travelocity. They're not going to care about changes, and they're already going to pay for bags, the seat assignments might be an issue for them though.
|
Originally Posted by Often1
(Post 23684067)
+1 - People get all hot and bothered that these fares exist. But, the bottom line is that there is a market for these seats, nobody is twisting anybody's arm to buy them and it's highly unlikely that in the low-roller market, people are calculating in the risk of changes and the like.
|
Originally Posted by HDQDD
(Post 23683512)
+1. DL shouldn't have even wasted the resources to come up with E fares.
Friday I'm flying on a U fare and feel like a big spender. Haha. No upgrade yet. 14 of 16 seats are open. As usual theses days. |
Originally Posted by flyerCO
(Post 23683970)
I thought E fares only got upgraded after all others had been upgraded. Not 100% sure on it though, but I thought there was some strange rule in regards to upgrades.
|
Originally Posted by Air Houston
(Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?
If any of you are like me, much of my travel is booked within 14 days. Will these even price at that short of a time frame? Our buy up minimum miles to first is ridiculously low, but the few times that I haven't been able to get into F, I've been finding myself in Y, B, M or K. |
Are the MSP routes new for E fares? I fly to LAS and FLL often and DL never has cheap fares on these routes. They have never attempted to compete with Spirit on these routes before. That I've seen anyways.
I would love to see some cheap fares to FLL this winter. And LAS for that matter. |
Originally Posted by WIRunner
(Post 23684169)
The better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it to be booked. I couldn't get one to price via our online TA (which is travelocity based). Also, cost or not, we have always required fares to be changeable. That alone would be enough reason to book up to a T or V fare.
Cheapest fare is cheapest fare, even if it's only $8 less than a V fare for my exact same flight. I'll pay $4 each way for an aisle seat, if I can figure out how to do it. Or maybe I can just wear a scarlet E on my clothing. |
Originally Posted by ramolnar
(Post 23684679)
Or maybe I can just wear a scarlet E on my clothing.
Then. All passengers board the plan based on MQD spend rather than zones or class. Remember lining up in grade school by height. Well delta has a modern take on that ordering of pax. |
Originally Posted by ramolnar
(Post 23684679)
The yet better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it NOT to be booked? I just found out that I received an E fare on ATL-SAT.
|
Originally Posted by jkatzen
(Post 23682668)
Why on earth would someone choose Delta's "E" fare on this? It's an objectively inferior product in virtually every way to Southwest's offering, but for the exact same price:
Then, for flights after 2/1, no upgrades and no same-day changes either. I guess you earn miles . . . Perhaps my view is partly shaped by seeing a few episodes of the old Southwest airlines reality show on cable TV that seemed to always show overbooked flights, lost and damaged luggage, and unhappy passengers while WN staff enjoyed their parties and played games on board. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 23686664)
I
Perhaps my view is partly shaped by seeing a few episodes of the old Southwest airlines reality show on cable TV that seemed to always show overbooked flights, lost and damaged luggage, and unhappy passengers while WN staff enjoyed their parties and played games on board. Perhaps you should actually give WN a try and then you could have an opinion based on reality ;) |
Originally Posted by Air Houston
(Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?
Originally Posted by WIRunner
(Post 23684169)
The better question is, will a corporate travel agency allow it to be booked. I couldn't get one to price via our online TA (which is travelocity based). Also, cost or not, we have always required fares to be changeable. That alone would be enough reason to book up to a T or V fare.
The problem I see with corporations booking this is the lack of residual value of the ticket. If travel plans change at the last minute for the employee no changes/no cancellations can become costly. |
Originally Posted by Air Houston
(Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?
Or, put another way, arm twisting is a made up term. |
Originally Posted by Air Houston
(Post 23684101)
If an employer requires an employee to use an E-fare to go on a trip they didn't really want to take, would that be considered arm twisting?
|
Originally Posted by TTT
(Post 23686903)
I was surprised that my corporate TA allowed one to be booked. We used to use Concur and that specifically had logic in the search that excluded E fares. Our new booking tool (internal) does not have that logic.
The problem I see with corporations booking this is the lack of residual value of the ticket. If travel plans change at the last minute for the employee no changes/no cancellations can become costly. |
Originally Posted by hazelrah
(Post 23686796)
HAHA basing your opinion on a TV show? You do realize that TV shows are based on the ludicrous, exaggeration, fantasy and drama?
Perhaps you should actually give WN a try and then you could have an opinion based on reality ;) |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 23687432)
FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.
It's clear you don't know in this respect, having never even flown them and are relying on a cartoonish version. The jokes are much diminished if at all (i don't even remember any jokes my last trip) , and no games either. |
Originally Posted by LBJ
(Post 23687427)
Most of the E fares I have seen are in the $200 - $300 range (often closer to $200). Even if they were changeable, there wouldn't be much residual value after the $200 domestic change fee.
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 23687432)
I don't need to fly WN to know that I want flights with nonstops from MSP departing from the main terminal, FC, reserved seats, airport lounges,fewer kids on average, interlining and IROPs rebooking on other carriers, and FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.
|
I don't fly often, but when I do, I prefer flights without baby goats.
|
Originally Posted by emrdoc
(Post 23687604)
Whats wrong with kids? No kids = no future
|
Originally Posted by EZEDoesIt
(Post 23687662)
I don't fly often, but when I do, I prefer flights without baby goats.
|
Originally Posted by HongKonger
(Post 23687731)
She hates children but won't fly private to avoid them.
|
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 23687432)
I don't need to fly WN to know that I want flights with nonstops from MSP departing from the main terminal, FC, reserved seats, airport lounges,fewer kids on average, interlining and IROPs rebooking on other carriers, and FAs that let me work in peace and quiet rather any annoying me with onboard games and jokes.
A few years back an AA exec observed for attribution that most people on the plane weren't accruing miles in any program, let alone AAdvantage, and certainly not carrying elite status. (AA was no slouch in promoting FF plans, either.) In that environment, an E fare doesn't forego much: those flyers weren't upgrade-eligible, they probably weren't priority boarding-eligible (CC benefit noted), MQDs mean nothing. I don't think for a minute that DL's choice of city pairs for E fares is random - I think DL is trying to figure out just what it needs to offer at what price points to compete with WN, Spirit and Allegiant. WN has been strong in Texas from day 1 and ATL-SAT/AUS are good test routes. On-time performance, frequency, and network depth may be enough, even without seat assignments. |
Originally Posted by emrdoc
(Post 23687604)
Whats wrong with kids? No kids = no future
WKBK (want kids buy kids, or maybe breed kids would be more accurate). |
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
(Post 23687829)
I don't think for a minute that DL's choice of city pairs for E fares is random - I think DL is trying to figure out just what it needs to offer at what price points to compete with WN, Spirit and Allegiant. WN has been strong in Texas from day 1 and ATL-SAT/AUS are good test routes. On-time performance, frequency, and network depth may be enough, even without seat assignments.
I'm airline agnostic these days and happily purchase WN and DL, even Allegiant alike, but an "e" fare as an inferior product is not even on my radar screen. I haven't sat in a middle seat in 14 years and don't intend to in the future. |
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
(Post 23687768)
I hate badly behaved children on planes and in airport, hotels, and restaurants. Fewer kids on board means fewer badly behaved kids on average unless we want to get into whether certain carriers have a higher incidence of bad behavior per child passenger.
They are kids...chill out. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:47 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.