![]() |
I have received numerous PMs about the Skyteam elite + comment I made a while back. Instead of answering each individually, I'll just post it here.
Areolineas Argentinas recently joined Skyteam. They are offering a very simple status match. Not a challenge, just a match. All you have to do is email them, include a pdf of your status elsewhere (AA etc) and voila you are STE+. It is valid for 12 months http://www.aerolineas.com.ar/arg/mai...44&idIdioma=en Easy way to get STE+. This won't get you upgrades on DL flights, but several other benefits. |
Originally Posted by itsaboutthejourney
(Post 20096941)
Starting in the 2014 qualification year, for 2015 status: Delta will add a revenue litmus test (on top of your normal status EQMs). This does not change the basic points earning ability. There is a bypass to the litmu$ te$t if you spend $25K on a SkyPeso AMEX.
IMHO, these spending minimums are not all that difficult to reach, except for the hardcore milage runners. The problem may be the requirements that the litmus test must be on 006 ticket stock, with some mixed info on JV/codeshare/DL marketed flights qualifying. I suspect the JV partners will cry foul and that spend will be included. What's NOT included is ancillary spend: SkyClub membership & drinks, bag fees, change fees, onboard purchases, upgrades, etc. I also suspect that the eCommerce side of DL will cry foul and those fees will be included in the spend in v 2.0 of this plan. This was only one shoe to drop, still expected are changes to redeeming SkyPesos. changes in MQM earning on partner's flights flown or on after March/1/2013. For that, you'll have to go through the earning charts and check it out. It is a big ticket for those who fly on partner's airlines or purchase a ticket on the airlines' partner number and not the DL codeshare number |
Originally Posted by FlyDeltaJets87
(Post 20096081)
If you stay at hotels and accumulate status, status is in direct relation to number of nights, which is in direct relation to the revenue you provide, and the cost of your stay is much more in line with operational costs. In most cases, if you spend more nights, you're spending more money. Thus those who spend 75 nights are more valuable than those spending 25.
With Hilton you can be gold by just getting a credit card and diamond by only charging $40K a year on it. So someone that has a Hilton credit card and only stays in their property a few times a year is going to get better treatment than someone who stays 14 1-night stays a year with no credit card. |
Originally Posted by itsaboutthejourney
(Post 20096941)
Starting in the 2014 qualification year, for 2015 status: Delta will add a revenue litmus test (on top of your normal status EQMs). This does not change the basic points earning ability. There is a bypass to the litmu$ te$t if you spend $25K on a SkyPeso AMEX.
IMHO, these spending minimums are not all that difficult to reach, except for the hardcore milage runners. The problem may be the requirements that the litmus test must be on 006 ticket stock, with some mixed info on JV/codeshare/DL marketed flights qualifying. I suspect the JV partners will cry foul and that spend will be included. What's NOT included is ancillary spend: SkyClub membership & drinks, bag fees, change fees, onboard purchases, upgrades, etc. I also suspect that the eCommerce side of DL will cry foul and those fees will be included in the spend in v 2.0 of this plan. This was only one shoe to drop, still expected are changes to redeeming SkyPesos. |
Originally Posted by jamesteroh
(Post 20097131)
Not really with a lot of hotel programs.
With Hilton you can be gold by just getting a credit card and diamond by only charging $40K a year on it. So someone that has a Hilton credit card and only stays in their property a few times a year is going to get better treatment than someone who stays 14 1-night stays a year with no credit card. Marriott has the "taste of Platinum" going on right now where you get PLT status instantly. So the hotel example is not a good one. |
Originally Posted by AeroWesty
(Post 20094391)
Do we know how many of those passengers, err trash, flew DL instead of AA or UA for the rest of the year on profitable fares because they were able to use their status to pad their accounts with some cheap miles? Don't most retail businesses run loss-leaders to bring in business from time-to-time?
|
Originally Posted by Deltahater
(Post 20097149)
You get Gold Status with your Platinum Amex card without requiring any stays.
Marriott has the "taste of Platinum" going on right now where you get PLT status instantly. So the hotel example is not a good one. |
Originally Posted by jamesteroh
(Post 20097197)
Hopefully Hilton and other hotel programs will follow Delta's changes It's absurd that someone gets the same benefits for simpling having a credit card as someone who spends 60+ nights a year with the chain.I am sure some of the people on this thread applauding the changes by Delta have no probelm being elite with a hotel program through ways other than earned status.
(stay credit, a breakfast, free internet) The only competition is for upgrades and >60% of my SPG upgrades clear which is good for Plat Light and I still have SNAs that I can use if I really care about an upgrade. |
Originally Posted by reef58
(Post 20096797)
Not to be rude, and I am being serious, if a customer does not spend at least $2500 they are not "Elite". That is not a massive amount of money to spend. Let's say with taxes $250 per month or so.
Since my travels could also take me to California more often in the future, the partner-earning changes and how those tickets qualify towards MQDs could also affect me directly if I credited AS flights to DL. Let's remember that this isn't the "How elite does your spend make you" thread to advance agendas, it's the Medallion Qualification Update thread, where we're able to discuss all of the changes. Outside of set dates for conferences or training sessions, I fly on B-fares mainly for business. If DL wants to sell me some tickets, they need to sell me on these changes, and how flying DL would be my best choice. I don't see where they've done so, so for the time being I've chosen to stick with the devil that I do know, rather than the devil that I don't know. Honestly, I don't see how thinning the ranks is suddenly going to change either the experience in First nor rid it of the riff-raff, as so many here are making claims about. All DL has said is that they're introducing MQDs as of 1/1/14 and lowering MQM-earning potential beginning 3/1/13, without telling us the direct benefits of this for those who choose to earn status with DL. So no, I don't agree with that any elite needs to make the case for why they're valuable to DL, as the person I originally quoted wants, DL needs to tell us why they're worth the investment of our travel dollars vs. other choices. Let DL sell the seat they could sell me for a B-fare most of the time to someone on a T-fare+ancillaries. I don't see how that's going to suddenly transform the front cabin or increase their revenue, but bubbashow and others seem to have that part all worked out, amazing as that may seem on the surface. |
Originally Posted by wdchuck1
(Post 20096619)
i am an AA explat - fly DL occasionally.
I see where the the dollar requirement is $.10 per mile. i can't remember the last time that i spent less than this on any flight; i can understand DL's point where they don't want to offer elite benefits to US customers who fly mainly Sky Team partners but is it worth the blowback that this is going to cause - Their SkyTeam partners have to be up in arms about this as it really denigrates the value of alliance. Between this, M+ for longhaul upgrades, the 72 hour rule and SkyPesos, it's beyond me why anyone who values a FFP and isn't captive to a hub would choose to fly DL. But then again, maybe few of them do. |
Originally Posted by gogreyhound
(Post 20096763)
We get it. You crave to be included in the self-coronated aristocracy that believes everyone else should get on bended knee and kiss your Bose headphones while you sashay through an airport. Coupled with that is an apparently Freudian urge to denigrate those who manage to get what you have at a much lower price as "trash" and "Greyhound quality."
(BTW, in early 2001 DL started flying JFK-NRT with the old MD-11s. The intro fare was about $450 a/i and came with double MQMs. I made FO on one flight, so let that stir the vitriol.) I don't much care for MQDs since I can hit 25k miles for much less than $2,500, even without IST and the ilk. When I look at the difference between the MQD threshold and what I spend, it's not worth it. That's just a simple calculation for me. But since many of the individual elite perks are for sale in some form, the goal of "low-rev elites need to go away" may happen in name only. In other words, "Mission Accomplished." I have to admit, I will smile if the lords of the manor discover that elite is no more elite in two years than it is now. |
Technically Delta doesn't call these people "elite". I believe that was an old NWA thing, Silver Elite, Gold Elite, etc. Delta only references them as "Medallions".
So all the talk about nobody is elite if everyone is elite, well, in fact, none of us are elite. |
Originally Posted by Ebes1099
(Post 20097735)
Technically Delta doesn't call these people "elite". I believe that was an old NWA thing, Silver Elite, Gold Elite, etc. Delta only references them as "Medallions".
So all the talk about nobody is elite if everyone is elite, well, in fact, none of us are elite. |
Originally Posted by DLroads
(Post 20097066)
Good summary, I would just add the part that seems to go secondary, though it should be primary for this membership year-
changes in MQM earning on partner's flights flown or on after March/1/2013. For that, you'll have to go through the earning charts and check it out. It is a big ticket for those who fly on partner's airlines or purchase a ticket on the airlines' partner number and not the DL codeshare number |
Originally Posted by AeroWesty
(Post 20097647)
... DL needs to tell us why they're worth the investment of our travel dollars vs. other choices...
Those who are getting emotionally upset about the changes are missing both points. DL's obligation is to do what it thinks will maximize profits and the consumer's individual obligation is to choose which program is best for him/her. None of us are married or related to DL. We have a business relationship. In that type of relationship, loyalties are always portable and conditions are subject to change. (That's even clearly stated in the T&Cs.) When Leo was running DL, I decided what DL was offering wasn't best for me and flew FL for a couple years. Later, when things changed both for me and at DL, DL once again became the best option for me. DL's program changes, my needs change and my loyalty shifts to what is best for me at the time. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 3:03 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.