Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Skymiles Change Rumor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2012, 12:38 pm
  #2641  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
Can't expect any business, including DL, to build a business model around the flawed thinking of businesses which reimburse their employee travel in odd & outmoded fashion.

Rock bottom, it was a big mistake during the last recession to keep capacity at all-time highs and cut fares and increase perks in order to get people to fly.

So, people started making elite on low $ spends, competition is down (see NW), capacity is down and something has to give.

Smartest think is to link status to $ spend or at least make $ spend a qualification. My prediction, watch the next 12-18 months. And, not just at DL. Those who swear they're going to jump ship, won't be doing it to UA, US, AA (or whatever that is in 18 months) because those carriers will do the same.
Often1 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 12:54 pm
  #2642  
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: Delta GM, Marriott Platinum, Hertz 5*
Posts: 2,530
Originally Posted by Often1
Can't expect any business, including DL, to build a business model around the flawed thinking of businesses which reimburse their employee travel in odd & outmoded fashion.
I disagree, especially in a service industry. And it is still VERY commonplace for employees to not be able to submit charges on a personal card for reimbursement, ESPECIALLY airfare. Many small and mid-size companies have negotiated rebates with the airlines based on spending tiers, and I've never heard of a large company that doesn't have some sort of deal in place. If companies reimburse personal-card purchases by employees, it is nearly impossible to accurately document total spend with each airline.

Originally Posted by Often1
Rock bottom, it was a big mistake during the last recession to keep capacity at all-time highs and cut fares and increase perks in order to get people to fly.

So, people started making elite on low $ spends, competition is down (see NW), capacity is down and something has to give.

Smartest think is to link status to $ spend or at least make $ spend a qualification. My prediction, watch the next 12-18 months. And, not just at DL. Those who swear they're going to jump ship, won't be doing it to UA, US, AA (or whatever that is in 18 months) because those carriers will do the same.
Spot on. This, I agree with completely.

But why would they "give away" non-BIS miles for next to nothing, while raping loyal BIS customers at the same time? If the AmEx mileage earling doesn't go down (or BIS earning go up), then the earning structure is meaningless. It will still favor tangential purchases (partner/AmEx spend) over loyalty to Delta.

And if those tangential businesses are more profitable to Delta than customers who fly K+ fares weekly, their is something fundamentally flawed with the business model that no loyalty program is going to fix.
dcline414 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 12:55 pm
  #2643  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by javabytes
Disagree. Certainly one can make the argument that 5 transcon RTs at $300 each today earn 25,000 miles. Save those miles for 3 years and the price for the ticket is now $500. You can claim that your miles have increased in value by $200. However, those 5 transcons, whether flown three years ago or flown today, should still be worth another transcon.
Crazy talk. Do you also expect the $200 you put under your mattress today to buy you $400 worth of goods tomorrow?

Miles don't increase in value.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 12:59 pm
  #2644  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by dcline414
But why would they "give away" non-BIS miles for next to nothing, while raping loyal BIS customers at the same time?
Cash flow.

Originally Posted by dcline414
And if those tangential businesses are more profitable to Delta than customers who fly K+ fares weekly, their is something fundamentally flawed with the business model that no loyalty program is going to fix.
You are just figuring this out? The airline business is fundamentally flawed, or at least it was as recently as 3 or 4 years ago. The jury is still out whether the current model is sustainable, but FF program rationalization will be part of any sustainable model.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:03 pm
  #2645  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by GYEWorldTraveler
I found a $1,500 ticket for 25k miles the other day. As always mileage tickets are not always correlated to the cost of a revenue ticket. Especially on competitive routes like NYC-FL or west coast to Hawaii. People always make the incorrect assumption that the two should go hand in hand when in reality it is revenue managements job to try and maximize profits. If they only want to allow 8 tickets at low level on a flight and they reach that number, the next ticket goes to 40,000 even though it may be T9 and there may be a $49 T fare available: See LAX-LAS. Often 40-50k miles and under $100RT....
HIGHLY unlikely you would be able to book a 25K reward flight while the corresponding fare is $1,500. Probably an award calendar bug that shows you 25k but jumps to 100K when set and done.
If anything, when a simple TCON is $1,500 it probably means the plane is close to sold-out. At that point, revenue management probably will pull award availability.
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:04 pm
  #2646  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,274
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Crazy talk. Do you also expect the $200 you put under your mattress today to buy you $400 worth of goods tomorrow?

Miles don't increase in value.
It's a loyalty program, not a currency. I expect the punch card from my pizza joint to still get me a free pizza after ten punches whether I take it in today or a year from now.
javabytes is online now  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:18 pm
  #2647  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by javabytes
It's a loyalty program, not a currency. I expect the punch card from my pizza joint to still get me a free pizza after ten punches whether I take it in today or a year from now.
The pizza joint can change the terms mid-way and say the punch card is no longer valid. Have you not followed the WN "free-drink-coupon-without-exp-date" lawsuit?
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:21 pm
  #2648  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,291
Originally Posted by dcline414
You're saying that as if it is a good thing. To the average business traveler, who is on the road 80-100% of the time, but cannot open a personal AmEx to use instead of their corporate card or TA direct-bill (a.k.a. the "bread and butter" of the airlines), this is a very, very bad change. To ma and pa kettle, who (maybe) fly a few times per year, this is great.

...

I could care less about the miles, as I have to spend over $6k to have enough miles for a free $200 ticket. My most recent redemption (40k) cost me roughly $10k to earn, but would have been $400 to purchase. (Yes, this is after dozens of hours of searching over a two month period.) With that kind of value, the redeemable miles are essentially worthless.
There are two sides of the equation: acquisition cost, and redemption cost. You can't ignore either. You are presuming that cheaper acquisition costs cause redemption costs to increase, but they haven't. If it costs half as much for some people to acquire miles (as you point out, not everyone can put their business spending on credit cards, but anyone can churn them or use them personally, and many promos are accessible to all) but it still costs 25K to redeem domestic coach, then it is indeed a good thing - award flights have halved in price. You can make a legit argument that this situation will lead to reduced award inventory, and while it is true that inventory is more scarce among all airlines now than a few years ago, the market value of the tickets they are securing is higher. Also, while it's a bit harder for Ma & Pa Kettle, with status and a little flexibility, 25K for first class on Delta is quite easy to get... I do it dozens of times per year, so I should know.

Why did you choose to redeem 40K miles for a $400 ticket? Weren't there options for fewer miles on other airlines? Do you have status and/or a little flexibility?

Originally Posted by pbarnette
Crazy talk. Do you also expect the $200 you put under your mattress today to buy you $400 worth of goods tomorrow?

Miles don't increase in value.
The 25K miles replace the cash you'd have to expend for a domestic coach (or first class if you have status) ticket. If that ticket costs $200 in year one and $400 in year two, then indeed your miles have increased in value... they save you $400 in airfare when they used to save you $200.
mooper is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:25 pm
  #2649  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: BZN
Programs: AA:LT Platinum DL:LT Gold UA:1P MAR:LT Titanium
Posts: 8,291
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
The pizza joint can change the terms mid-way and say the punch card is no longer valid. Have you not followed the WN "free-drink-coupon-without-exp-date" lawsuit?
True, but in this case, Delta (nor the other majors) have changed the amount needed for a low/saver domestic coach ticket. They've actually improved the situation by offering elites first class for the same 25K amount. (I'm leaving award inventory arguments out of this example... I'm assuming you have the flexibility to redeem 25K for what you want to the same degree you used to.)

Also, while an airline or a pizza shop can change the terms of their notes, the government can also change the value of a currency. (Fed with the dollar, etc.) Really no different.
mooper is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:40 pm
  #2650  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,877
Originally Posted by dcline414
Especially when scrutiny is at an all-time high with regard to travel expenses, and any fare that is even pennies more than the cheapest option must be justified.
Not all companies are this short-sighted.
DelrayChris is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 1:41 pm
  #2651  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,274
(Deleted)
javabytes is online now  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 2:17 pm
  #2652  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by mooper
The 25K miles replace the cash you'd have to expend for a domestic coach (or first class if you have status) ticket. If that ticket costs $200 in year one and $400 in year two, then indeed your miles have increased in value... they save you $400 in airfare when they used to save you $200.
I think it better to think in terms of expected value. If you think about it, the 25k miles don't provide you a free ticket, they provide you with the chance of a free ticket. To that end, by reducing the likelihood of you obtaining the ticket for 25k (by reducing availability), your expected value for those 25k miles has decreased. I suspect that the expected value has remained relatively constant.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 3:16 pm
  #2653  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MCO
Programs: DL DM/MM, Marriott Plat Premier, HH Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 4,081
Originally Posted by mooper
You're suggesting that consumers are better off when there is overcapacity and many airlines hemorrhaging cash on the brink of bankruptcy. Fewer, stable, profitable airlines can be a good thing for consumers, too. It took several years to work out the excess capacity and get fares up (they are still not much above historical lows in real terms) to a point where some airlines could actually make money.
Depends on how selfish a point of view you want to take. Excess capacity is good for consumers, in the short run. Competition for seats is greater, more seats available for UG, and probably some pressure to tweak the FF programs up a bit. But you are correct, that would be enjoyed for only a brief period because the airlines would be back where they were.

As for fares, most of mine are at least 50% above where they were a few years ago, well above historical lows. The airlines, not the inmates (FFers), are very much in control now.
Sez_Who is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 3:53 pm
  #2654  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: LAS
Programs: PA FT, TW Gold, NW/CO PE, VK Eagleflyer
Posts: 7,173
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
The pizza joint can change the terms mid-way and say the punch card is no longer valid. Have you not followed the WN "free-drink-coupon-without-exp-date" lawsuit?
Oh, the DL Flying Colonels model.
Sabai is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2012, 3:58 pm
  #2655  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Posts: 10,003
Originally Posted by DelrayChris
Not all companies are this short-sighted.
The company I work for only requires justification when the delta for Delta is >$150. In other words, I can fly nonstop on Delta instead of connecting on a different airline as long as the nonstop costs no more than $150 above the lowest priced connecting flight that would otherwise meet my needs.
amanuensis is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.