International connection decision CDG or JFK
#3
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SEA - DL DM/2MM, *A Gold, SPG Lifetime Plat, some other car and hotel stuff
Posts: 5,649
JFK is generally better.
However, I take in to account origin/destination. If my travel is SEA to NCE, I'd rather have one long flight (SEA-CDG) for sleeping followed by a very short one (CDG-NCE), as opposed to two medium length flights (SEA-JFK and JFK-NCE).
However, I take in to account origin/destination. If my travel is SEA to NCE, I'd rather have one long flight (SEA-CDG) for sleeping followed by a very short one (CDG-NCE), as opposed to two medium length flights (SEA-JFK and JFK-NCE).
#4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mostly living in the basement
Programs: Newly minted free agent; MR LT(!)TE, HH SE, BA SECM, DL MM, UA PS, 2V Fanboi, CBP GE
Posts: 5,108
For returning, an advantage of CDG is that you'll clear immigration at your destination, not at JFK while you still have a connection to make.
#6
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Programs: DL, AA, US, SWA
Posts: 1,129
I am looking at a more general scenario. For the average traveler, which is easier. An English speaker might think that JFK is and a French speaker might think that CDG is.
I had not thought about the long flight first or second idea. I will take that into consideration.
I had not thought about the long flight first or second idea. I will take that into consideration.
#7
Join Date: Jan 2010
Programs: AA Plat 2MM/UA G MM/DL MM DM 2015/BA Silver/Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 3,103
#9
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: UA Premier 1K: PlAAtinum; DL SM, MM; Marriott Gold; CO Plat Emeritus; NW Plat Emeritus
Posts: 4,776
I would usually pick CDG -- too many operations issues at JFK. But depends on routes, equipment etc.
I'm at CDG a lot, and honestly don't understand why some people dislike it.
I'm at CDG a lot, and honestly don't understand why some people dislike it.
#10
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LAX
Programs: Delta Plat, CO Gold, AF
Posts: 403
My vote is for CDG. Never had a problem, and I actually like the airport. Plus, get a good nights sleep from LAX, and the connections are pretty easy. Leave at least 90 minutes for your connection though. Anything shorter and my luggage usually gets left behind.
#11
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K (MM), DL, AA, AS, HHonors, SPG, Kimpton, Hyatt, IC PC, Marriott Titanium (LT PLT), Hertz PC
Posts: 7,231
JFK on the other hand has its own problems. Delays are likely, and the facilities are subpar. But it's familiar and somewhat logically laid out.
#12
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: LAX
Programs: Fallen DL DM (PM) 2MM
Posts: 4,783
When going to Europe, I usually like the connection there (CDG/AMS) because if there are problems there are ground alternatives (e.g. take a train)
Coming back there are advantages to a connection in the US as there usually more flight alternatives -- e.g. if JFK-XXX is canceled there may be one stop alternatives -- JFK-DTW-XXX, JFK-ATL-XXX or JFK-MSP-XXX, etc.
But usually for me price and schedule end up dictating things
Coming back there are advantages to a connection in the US as there usually more flight alternatives -- e.g. if JFK-XXX is canceled there may be one stop alternatives -- JFK-DTW-XXX, JFK-ATL-XXX or JFK-MSP-XXX, etc.
But usually for me price and schedule end up dictating things
#13
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Atlanta
Programs: DL Silver, Marriott Plat, Everything else basic
Posts: 79
I generally work to avoid both JFK and CDG and will pay more to get fewer/better connections.
The big concern I have with CDG is the signage is very confusing. Most of the signs are in English, and I speak a little French, but it's still odd figuring out where you are going.
In avoiding JFK I can almost always find another international gateway out of the US (ATL, DTW, MSP, maybe even MEM), but it's sometimes harder finding a place to connect in Europe. If AMS isn't an option Paris is pretty much it for a lot of flights.
I do like that at CDG you can go into Paris easily and wander around for a few hours. I had a 7 hour layover last year and had a great time having lunch, wandering around, etc in the city.
#14
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 664
+1. When both airports are undesirable for transfer, then the next thing I consider is the length of the TATL flight. I would prefer to longer leg first to sleep, particularly if in J class, than have 2 medium length flights.
#15
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
Avoid both if possible. Try to connect through AMS (pleasant and efficient) or, on the US side, DTW, etc. (not ATL).