Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > Delta Air Lines | SkyMiles
Reload this Page >

Did LAX and ATL airports move 5 miles closer?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Did LAX and ATL airports move 5 miles closer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 9, 2011, 9:29 am
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,375
ATL-IAD was 534 for a long time, recently posted as 532

I think there was some similar discussion on the UA thread -- as well as here -- last year

Last edited by jrl767; Jan 9, 2011 at 9:54 am Reason: add ref to DL
jrl767 is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 9:31 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: BOS, NYC
Programs: DL Plat, HH Diamond, SPG Gold, Hertz Gold
Posts: 572
Originally Posted by jrl22
ssssssssssssshhhh. be VERY quiet .......
Yes please, Delta doesn't need any more "enhancements."
turnpike17 is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 9:43 am
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Programs: Formaldehyde Medallion DL DieMiles
Posts: 12,646
How time flies... I did not realize that it was already time for the annual "DL has changed the mileage between XXX and YYY" thread.

It is all related to this factor:

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t...a-airport.html
StayingHomeIsBetter is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 10:38 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,621
I was credited 1946 MQMs on LAX-ATL last week. Strange indeed.
akonradi is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 10:46 am
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Blue Ridge, GA
Posts: 5,513
Do you earn more MQMs changing planes on a dog-leg run offered on the website along with non-stops? Or is the non-stop the default and only mileage calculation when both booking options are listed?
LegalTender is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 10:59 am
  #21  
A4K
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: N/A
Programs: N/A
Posts: 823
I always found it interesting that detlta.com lists ATL-DEN as 1199 miles, but when you get milage credit it comes out as 1208 miles.

Anyone else see this on routes?
A4K is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 11:00 am
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SEA (the REAL Washington); occasionally in the other Washington (DCA area)
Programs: DL PM 1.57MM; AS MVPG 100K
Posts: 21,375
Originally Posted by LegalTender
Do you earn more MQMs changing planes on a dog-leg run offered on the website along with non-stops? Or is the non-stop the default and only mileage calculation when both booking options are listed?
each segment is credited individually

that said, there is ongoing debate about whether thru flights (same flight number with a stop but no change of plane, e.g., DCA-SLC-LAX) give origin-destination only (DCA-LAX = 2311) or the sum of the segments (DCA-SLC = 1851, SLC-LAX = 590, total = 2441)
jrl767 is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 11:51 am
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 662
This time they used a metal tape measure instead of a cloth one.
buffcoat is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2011, 4:19 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sarasota, FL
Programs: Delta PM
Posts: 44
Originally Posted by DaDaDan
I'm not sure if this was a joke, but it is almost certainly not the explanation. ATL and LAX both have east-west aligned runways. So they'd have to have extended the runways (considerably) to move the airport survey point by 5 miles.

I hope I'll arrive at the furthest runway!
petez85 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011, 12:56 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Atlanta
Programs: DL: PM, Marriott: Plat, UA: GS
Posts: 37
Just another form of SM devaluation. Kinda like Haagen Dazs taking two oz. out of their packaging and charging the same price
lrac is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011, 1:18 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 485
Originally Posted by lrac
Just another form of SM devaluation. Kinda like Haagen Dazs taking two oz. out of their packaging and charging the same price
How can you claim this even though several city pairs have had an increase in EQM's?
Brick is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:03 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,397
I was glad when ATL-PHL went from 666 to 665 miles.
nfg05 is offline  
Old Jan 10, 2011, 11:10 pm
  #28  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by nfg05
I was glad when ATL-PHL went from 666 to 665 miles.
Lol... In this case, the decrease in mileage is acceptable
golfingboy is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2011, 12:43 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Programs: Delta DM, Continental PE
Posts: 230
As a pilot, I always assumed mileage was based on the filed flight plan (which is canned and the same every day, unless changed due to weather, etc.).

So if they changed the routing on the canned flight plan, the mileage would change.

What irritates me is if you make a connection, but to the same flight number, the mileage is credited as if you went from point A to point C, without the extra mileage for the "B" connection. But if the flight number changes, you get credit for both legs. Even though you are changing planes in either case.

SR
srilm is offline  
Old Jan 11, 2011, 2:34 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,688
How about actual distance travelled through the air, i.e. including diagonally.
DaDaDan is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.