Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Cruises
Reload this Page >

Advice for total Princess noob

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Advice for total Princess noob

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 8, 2009 | 4:26 pm
  #16  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tenerife, Canary Islands/Hannover, Germany
Programs: Celebrity Elite Plus, RCCL Diamond, Princess Platinum, Carlson Gold, IHG Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 669
Originally Posted by AAPlatRN
One thing to consider is to see if there are any handcap or accessible cabins available. We stayed in one and it slept 3 comfortably. We didn't have to provide any documentation, we just requested it.
If noone in the group is handicapped, they should not be requesting an ADA cabin. There are so few of these cabins available and should be kept open for handicapped passengers to book. Also, a thing to remember, if you book into an ADA cabin without needing it, the cruiseline can bump you if necessary! Same procedure as booking a large family aft cabin, on some of the cruiselines, with a reservation for less than 4 pax. And the Alaska cruises have lots of families aboard.

I am not disabled. I just don't agree with advising the OP to book an ADA cabin.
Tenerife is offline  
Old Jan 9, 2009 | 1:33 pm
  #17  
Senior Moderator and Moderator: American AAdvantage & TravelBuzz
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: BOS
Programs: AA EXP, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 10,674
Originally Posted by mikeef
I cruised all the time with my parents and a younger brother on Princess when I was a teenager. We had an inside cabin with bunkbeds. It was tight, but truthfully, we spent so little time in the cabin that it didn't matter.

Mike
My first cruise was on a Princess ship to Alaska. My parents were in one inside cabin, and I was with my grandparents (who were in their 60s) in another inside cabin with bunkbeds.

I agree with Mike 100%. I doubt your 14-year old is gonna be in the cabin that much. He'll basically just show up to change clothes for dinner and to sleep. The scenery is beautiful, and the ships are a wonderful experience - so get out of your room and experience them.
JY1024 is offline  
Old Jan 12, 2009 | 7:34 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Elgin, IL, U.S.A.
Posts: 912
What did bother me was that in two different places, the ship sent out a small boat with photographers with telephoto lenses, and photographed all the people on their balconies. That I really thought was an invasion of privacy. I personally wasn't doing anything embarrassing, but some folks were less than fully dressed in their photos.
I understand this point of view but that's one of the things that I liked the most when I booked a balcony on one of my Alaska cruises. How else are you going to have a photo of you and companions from that angle? Interesting.
Viajera is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 12:35 am
  #19  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 5,026
Originally Posted by Viajera
I understand this point of view but that's one of the things that I liked the most when I booked a balcony on one of my Alaska cruises. How else are you going to have a photo of you and companions from that angle? Interesting.
So the potential desire of a few for the photo (and the ship's desire to make more money) strips away the reasonable expectation of privacy? Sorry, I don't see that at all. Beside a dock I know anything on a balcony might be observed, but when you're cruising open water I do expect privacy on the balcony.

I would also point out that very few of the photos sold - almost all of them were still in the racks as we disembarked.
CDTraveler is offline  
Old Jan 13, 2009 | 5:00 pm
  #20  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,202
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
So the potential desire of a few for the photo (and the ship's desire to make more money) strips away the reasonable expectation of privacy?
Unfortunalely, when you sign up for a cruise, you pretty much give up that right.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 6:09 pm
  #21  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
1M
40 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SF CA USA. I love large faceless corporations. And they cherish me in return (sometimes). ;)
Programs: UA Premier Gold/disappointed 1MM, HH Gold, IHG Plat, MB lifetime Gold, BW Diam Sel
Posts: 17,819
Originally Posted by CDTraveler
This I don't think is correct for most ships. We were on Deck 11 of the Dawn Princess - basically the top deck of cabins - and there was no way to see onto anyone else's balcony. The ship's sides are close to vertical, not staggered, so you really can't overlook anything on the ship from a balcony.
You are not well informed. Princess' fleet contains very different TYPES of ships. While the Dawn (and Sun/Sea) Princess ships may not have terraced balconies, a number of their other (more recent) ships DO have them, such as the Star Princess (and her sister ships). From my Aloha deck balcony cabin on the Star, I could look down at certain of the balcony levels below (the Caribe and Dolphin levels), which jutted out. Also, of course those on the Caribe and Dolphin levels could look up and see those in balconies above them (not that they actually did so very often ). I don't think anyone out on their balconies on these types of ships could reasonably have any expectation of complete privacy.

See the two photos here (courtesy of a poster on CruiseCritic):

http://good-times.webshots.com/photo...03442853TnzlLM
KathyWdrf is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.