Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Credit Card Competition Act

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2024, 4:32 pm
  #31  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,508
Originally Posted by cbn42
Why would surcharging become more common? I would think that capping interchange fees would reduce merchants' need to surcharge. The threat of surcharges spreading is probably what incentivized Visa/MC to agree to this deal.
If the plaintiffs' attorneys are to be believed, the settlement would allow something like 96% of transactions to be surcharged (up from less than 20% before). Depending on how much latent demand there is and how the final rules are structured, that would likely be enough to get a significant number more to start doing so--especially since the settlement doesn't lower interchange that much.
tmiw is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 12:56 am
  #32  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Saipan, MP 96950 USA (Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands = the CNMI)
Programs: UA Silver, Hilton Silver. Life: UA .57 MM, United & Admirals Clubs (spousal), Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,086
Originally Posted by Sandeep1 (Post # 27)
Crisis averted? Visa, Mastercard reach $30 Billion Deal with US Retailers

Link: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...=closeamericas
Discussion in this thread:

https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/cred...ettlement.html
SPN Lifer is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 2:36 am
  #33  
Moderator: Manufactured Spending
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,582
Originally Posted by tmiw
If the plaintiffs' attorneys are to be believed, the settlement would allow something like 96% of transactions to be surcharged (up from less than 20% before). Depending on how much latent demand there is and how the final rules are structured, that would likely be enough to get a significant number more to start doing so--especially since the settlement doesn't lower interchange that much.
Even if only 20% of transactions can currently be surcharged, all transactions can have a cash discount and it is still relatively rare, so I don't think there is much latent demand. Perhaps there will be more surcharging at the types of merchants that already do it, but I just can't imagine national retailers starting this practice.
cbn42 is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 2:54 am
  #34  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,083
Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
Moderator1 Might merging these threads be appropriate? I think there might a few other mirror discussions floating around too.
moondog is online now  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 10:42 am
  #35  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New York
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott LTPP, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 1,079
Originally Posted by moondog
Might merging these threads be appropriate? I think there might a few other mirror discussions floating around too.
The mods are free to do what they want, but Durbin's Credit Card Competition Act would go much further in forcing alternate networks, not just paltry (7 basis points over 5 years overall average, and 4 basis points for three years on published interchange schedules) temporary cuts consented to by the card networks.

While the topics of reduced interchange under Durbin and impact on rewards if it passes are common concerns with the Visa/Mastercard proposed settlement, the mechanics and degree of how each (if they come to pass - again, CCCA hasn't passed with Durbin, and the proposed settlement agreement for Visa/MC with retailers is still proposed, not agreed or approved by a judge) are different enough where, IMO, if we try to consolidate all of these threads it'll just be a mess. The CCCA is distinct in that it effectively seeks to remove Visa/MC entirely from transactions in favor of fostering competition with secondary networks having to be offered on Visa/MC cards from issuers with >$100B assets.

There might be some greater argument into consolidating the Visa/MC settlement thread into the overall 2024 onwards credit card surcharging thread. The Visa/MC settlement goes beyond surcharging and interchange adjustments, but a lot of the discussion in those threads is likely more common.
SPN Lifer and G2244 like this.
phltraveler is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2024, 12:22 pm
  #36  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 42,083
Got you. My current policy is try to only maintain one subscription to general topics that I'm curious but not super curious about (e.g all things Boeing), about I still appreciate and respect the importance of nuance (i.e. benefits of giving distinct sub topics their own homes).
SPN Lifer likes this.
moondog is online now  
Old Apr 15, 2024, 12:36 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SAF
Programs: IHG Silver
Posts: 676
Looks like there is now an official DOT and CFPB hearing to take place on May 9th that is focused on both the FF programs themselves as well as related credit cards:

TPG Article
Sandeep1 and hiker67 like this.
G2244 is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2024, 12:42 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2023
Posts: 45
Originally Posted by G2244
Looks like there is now an official DOT and CFPB hearing to take place on May 9th that is focused on both the FF programs themselves as well as related credit cards:

TPG Article
"Delta Air Lines, for instance, has said that nearly 1% of the U.S. GDP is spent on its cobranded credit cards."
hiker67 is offline  
Old Apr 15, 2024, 12:52 pm
  #39  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 5,867
Originally Posted by G2244
Looks like there is now an official DOT and CFPB hearing to take place on May 9th that is focused on both the FF programs themselves as well as related credit cards:

TPG Article
This actually sounds good. Hold their feet to the fire. The lack of notice before devaluations is the one thing that really bothers me.
moondog likes this.
Sandeep1 is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2024, 11:30 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New York
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott LTPP, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 1,079
Originally Posted by G2244
Looks like there is now an official DOT and CFPB hearing to take place on May 9th that is focused on both the FF programs themselves as well as related credit cards:

TPG Article
I would note that the focus here seems to be moreso on that commitments of sign up bonuses and earn rates are met, as well as if the marketing is misleading (50,000 miles, enough for two roundtrip tickets [if you can find a 12.5k per direction super saver rate) and the business practices towards consumers (devaluations with little warning, restrictions on award availability etc)... by the DOT and CFPB. None of the panelists are from the largest US issuing banks or the largest US airlines.

Durbin wanted open testimony on "how the sausage is made" in terms of how much airlines pay for these deals, how much banks pay for miles, etc... basically with Durbin as the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, "inviting" big airline CEOs (Delta, American, United) to testify. They've obviously not entertained that invitation thus far.

So these two on their face seem to be about very different conversations.
SPN Lifer likes this.
phltraveler is offline  
Old Apr 17, 2024, 7:29 am
  #41  
 
Join Date: Oct 2023
Posts: 115
  • Scott DeAngelo, executive vice president and chief marketing officer, Allegiant Air
  • Morgan Harper, director of policy and advocacy, American Economic Liberties Project
  • Andrew Grimm, president and CEO, Apple Federal Credit Union
  • Sara Nelson, international president, Association of Flight Attendants
  • Lukas Johnson, chief commercial officer, Breeze Airways
  • Erin Witte, director of consumer protection, Consumer Federation of America
  • Robert Patrick Cooper, senior vice president and general counsel, OneUnited Bank
Its a literal who are these people and why would they matter when no one from Delta, United, AA, JPM/Chase, BoA, etc are there?
Association of Flight Attendants, Consumer Federation. and maybe the American Economic Liberties Project people are all fine but those others are suspect.
LETTERBOY likes this.
FlyerAVL is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.