| Phantom707 |
Sep 16, 2015 1:36 pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by snic
(Post 25433397)
Exactly what I do. Worked like a charm until I was in some outlet store, and mrs snic makes me stand in line with an armful of crap while she goes looking for... more crap. Of course this is the one time that the cashier insists on verifying the signature (which I can't really imitate), so I have to call her and wait for her to show up, while the line behind me grows increasingly restless. :mad:
|
I get that people are upset since their normal expectation is to not have to have the signature verified. It takes time and can sometimes cause situations like the above.
But really, can you blame a person who actually does it? Technically, they're supposed to be verifying the signature. That's what it's there for. Yeah, the vast majority of situations, they don't do it. But those few times that they do verify, it's to try to reduce fraud.
Here's a comparison. A lot of people don't wear seat belts when driving because they either find it uncomfortable or too much of a hassle to put on. Let's just imagine that the vast majority of people don't put them on. But they're there for a reason. The laws say you have to wear them for a reason. It's trying to protect the lives of people, similar to how signature verification is trying to protect against fraud.
Yes, we now have better ways to prevent fraud (PIN instead of signature), but that's at least where the law of signatures came from. The law is just slow to catch up with technological developments.
|