Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 3, 2020, 1:56 am
  #811  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,541
Originally Posted by Dan1113
Quote:Priti Patel: 'We owe it to the victims of Covid-19 to impose quarantine'
There is a certain paradox in the combination of self-righteousness with regards to new measures and complete absence of self-criticism pertaining to past decisions. On an emotional level, many will find the reference bordering on indecency, because regardless of the cases for and against blanket quarantine rules, what victims of Covid-19 were presumably owed were responsible decisions at a time they were almost jovially dismissed, a testing system which failed to be brought in place for weeks, basic protective equipment which absence exposed thousands, and a less decrepit hospital system which would have resulted in the UK having a less high death rate amongst hospitalised patients. On a rational level, many will decipher this as tantamount to confessing to the absurdity of one's sequence of policy choices because if the Home Secretary is right that tens of thousands of past victims were owed a quarantine policy several months later, what could that possibly say about the complete lack of border instruction for past weeks, and how does it justify 1) hardening the border control regime now, and 2) doing it universally rather than selectively.

I've also read the flurry of scientific commentaries all published yesterday (what a coincidence) aimed at explaining why the "air bridge system" would be problematic. What is striking about them is that none of the arguments that they make about why air bridges actually pertain to the scientists' own expertise (ie medical arguments) but all to fields in which they are not competent and which are core policy questions (and in my view all rather easy to solve): "What if people book 2 months in advance and the country they were planning to go to has a new outburst and gets off the safe list, would they be reimbursed?" (insurantial question with no medical relevance), "What if people are effectively coming from a non safe country?" (for years, countries with entry forms have asked people to list which countries they have been to in the past two weeks. It would be perfectly easy to add that to an entry questionnaire and include quarantine for anyone who has been to countries x, y, z any time in the past two weeks), etc.

In effect, the continuation of the quarantine measures over time will have less to do with whether it is medically effective or not compared to the evolution of continuous power struggles between different factions of the Cabinet who still seem to disagree fundamentally on what is the best course of action in weeks and months to come. It is, squarely (and legitimately), a political decision which should drop the pretense of scientific justification which has been willfully ignored with regards to decisions where it was certainly much stronger/more unanimous.
brunos, Silver Fox and 13901 like this.

Last edited by NewbieRunner; Jun 3, 2020 at 2:06 am Reason: Font size
orbitmic is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 1:57 am
  #812  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by LondonElite
It really is not unreasonable to quarantine after travel. I suspect your house is nicer than any jail, that really is a bit much drama.
not to a place that has less virus than you do! I don’t mind getting tested of symptom checked, but I have a great active outdoor life and being forced home is punishment for no reason, it is house arrest.
Silver Fox likes this.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:00 am
  #813  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Originally Posted by ahmetdouas
not to a place that has less virus than you do! I don’t mind getting tested of symptom checked, but I have a great active outdoor life and being forced home is punishment for no reason, it is house arrest.
That has no relevance. You can be an asymptomatic carrier, having picked up the virus in a place with a low incidence rate, or in travel, and infect your already hard hit community on the way back.
flashware likes this.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:04 am
  #814  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
Originally Posted by LondonElite
It really is not unreasonable to quarantine after travel. I suspect your house is nicer than any jail, that really is a bit much drama.
The issue is the fact that many cannot work from home and thus it is not an option.
Silver Fox likes this.
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:10 am
  #815  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by LondonElite
That has no relevance. You can be an asymptomatic carrier, having picked up the virus in a place with a low incidence rate, or in travel, and infect your already hard hit community on the way back.
actually London already has had it so much that the community is quite immune so the quarantine makes no sense now, even more so with exemptions and the fact that you can go shopping and take public transport !

also they need to speed up antibody testing as if I have a positive one they’ll have a very hard time convincing me I am not immune to it ! If 20% of London has already had it I am very curious to see my result

this policy is just to cover up other policy failures and appear they are in control; I cannot see a policy so far that has brought so much negative press and ridicule since this virus has started, even worse with Patel’s statement yesterday, they should be ashamed of themselves
Silver Fox and paulaf like this.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:19 am
  #816  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
It is ridiculous, I agree. It should have been put in place six weeks ago. Much of it is posturing by a politicians playing catch-up. But why not go and get yourself tested, then you'll know whether you've had it or not, but don't assume that having had it makes you immune.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:24 am
  #817  
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: LHR/ATH
Programs: Amex Platinum, LH SEN (Gold), BA Bronze
Posts: 4,489
Originally Posted by LondonElite
It is ridiculous, I agree. It should have been put in place six weeks ago. Much of it is posturing by a politicians playing catch-up. But why not go and get yourself tested, then you'll know whether you've had it or not, but don't assume that having had it makes you immune.
i would if it would get me out of travel quarantine, but I cannot tell people ok guys I am not quarantining because I have a positive antibody test, although that would be an interesting court case if it ever got there !
Silver Fox and paulaf like this.
ahmetdouas is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:25 am
  #818  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,345
Originally Posted by LondonElite
It is ridiculous, I agree. It should have been put in place six weeks ago. Much of it is posturing by a politicians playing catch-up. But why not go and get yourself tested, then you'll know whether you've had it or not, but don't assume that having had it makes you immune.
Can you advise where you can get an antibody test for free please as I would like one too, I thought it was just currently for NHS workers?
Silver Fox likes this.
paulaf is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:30 am
  #819  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
I have no idea where you can get one in the UK, but I can get one by going to see my doctor. In fact, I emailed her yesterday to pick up a repeat prescription and she asked if anyone in the family felt a need for a test.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:32 am
  #820  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 2,345
Originally Posted by LondonElite
I have no idea where you can get one in the UK, but I can get one by going to see my doctor. In fact, I emailed her yesterday to pick up a repeat prescription and she asked if anyone in the family felt a need for a test.
you're lucky we can't do that here in the UK.
paulaf is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 2:48 am
  #821  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canada, USA, Europe
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 31,452
Perhaps OT, but a friend who was convinced he and his wife and daughter had it (flu symptoms, no energy, feeling terrible for two weeks, etc) had a test done...none of them had it, just regular flu. This is why testing is important; he figured we've been to the rodeo, we're ok going forward, when that was not in fact the case.
LondonElite is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 4:00 am
  #822  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,709
Originally Posted by Dan1113
The issue is the fact that many cannot work from home and thus it is not an option.
So they shouldn't travel then, it's very simple really.
flashware is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 4:05 am
  #823  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
Sure. But is that fair? That is the point. It makes no sense when we are the worst off of Europe anyway.

Germany will lift a travel ban for European Union member states plus Britain, Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland from 15 June as long as there are no entry bans or large-scale lockdowns in those countries, the foreign minister said.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Heiko Maas said all countries concerned met those criteria except Norway due to an entry ban and Spain, where he said parliament was deciding whether to extend an entry ban.

Maas said the travel warning would be replaced with guidelines, adding that Germans would be urged not to travel to Britain when not essential while a 14-day quarantine in place.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h...-idUSKBN23A1A3
Silver Fox likes this.
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 4:09 am
  #824  
Moderator, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges, and Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Programs: BA Lifetime Gold; Flying Blue Life Platinum; LH Sen.; Hilton Diamond; Kemal Kebabs Prized Customer
Posts: 63,830
Here is the press release for today, I am expecting further documents will also be released this afternoon. There isn't a lot new, other than some CTA passengers will need to fill in the form.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/p...orce-next-week
corporate-wage-slave is offline  
Old Jun 3, 2020, 4:10 am
  #825  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,709
Originally Posted by Dan1113
Sure. But is that fair? That is the point. It makes no sense when we are the worst off of Europe anyway.


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-h...-idUSKBN23A1A3
Life isn't fair, I'm surprised most people haven't realised that by now. The quicker we learn to accept the things we have no control the better off we will be as a society.
flashware is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.