Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Health and Fitness > Coronavirus and travel
Reload this Page >

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Jun 4, 2020, 5:57 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: NewbieRunner
Mod note on thread engagement:

A reminder that this thread is about the self-isolation requirements for UK arrivals.

It is a help/Information resource for those travelling or returning to England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland from outside the UK. Let's concentrate on news, questions and answers that are relevant and on-topic and stay away from speculations about the spread of the virus, the performance of politicians and other topics which are more suitable for OMNI.

Please stay within these requirements to avoid issues.

LATEST UPDATES

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/travel-t...virus-covid-19


18 March travel to the UK changes

If you will arrive in the UK from abroad after 4am, Friday 18 March, you do not need to:
  • take any COVID-19 tests – before you travel or after you arrive
  • fill in a UK passenger locator form before you travel

This will apply whether you are vaccinated or not.

You also will not need to quarantine when you arrive, in line with current rules.
Other countries still have COVID-19 entry rules in place. You should check travel advice before you travel.
If you will arrive in England before 4am, 18 March, you must follow the current rules as set out in this guidance.

*****

The following historical information is retained for the time being.

The Passenger Locator Form for passengers arriving into the UK can be found here:
https://visas-immigration.service.go...r-locator-form
This can only be completed once you are within 48 hours of arrival in the UK.

Exemption list from quarantine requirements - specific details:
https://www.gov.uk/government/public...k-border-rules

England
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to England: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/582/contents (this html version is updated, but may not have the very latest updates for Statutory Instruments released in the last few days)

Test to release for England only from 15 December, see post 4776 https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/32841066-post4776.html

Statutory instrument for transport providers http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2.../contents/made

Scotland
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Scotland: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2020/169/contents (this html version is updated)

Wales
Statutory instrument for individual passengers arriving in to Wales: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2020/574/contents (this html version is updated) &
Welsh language version: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/wsi/2...0200574_we.pdf

Northern Ireland
Statutory instrument https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2021/99/contents (this html version is updated)


PRACTICAL GUIDANCE FOR QUICK RELEASE FROM SELF-ISOLATION (based on November 28th updates)
[This section has been moved lower down in the wiki post following the change in self-isolation rule on 7th January 2022[

Any PCR test noted as a UK Government Day 2 test will be accepted for release from self isolation as soon as you get the negative result. If it is any other PCR test (eg "Fit to Fly") and not advertised specifically as a Day 2 test then it won't be valid.

This means that you can:[list]
  • Book a suitable Day 2 PCR test before you travel and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF (Passenger Locator Form).
    • On your day of arrival go to your scheduled test.
      • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        Alternatively:
        • Book any Day 2 PCR test before you travel even if you do not intend to use this test, and use the booking reference for the test on the PLF to ensure entry to the UK.
          • Note that you are not strictly required to have a PCR booking before arrival, but your carrier might not know that so you run the risk of being denied boarding
          • On your day of arrival (or before end of Day 2) go to a walk-in test centre and take a different test to the one you booked.
            • Proceed to you place of self-isolation and await the result, which will hopefully be same / next day.

        If you are leaving the UK before the end of day 2 then you do not need to take a test, but are required to self-isolate for the duration of your trip (since you do not have a negative result). Also, if you are self-isolating while waiting for a result (and hence have not been informed of a positive result and need to isolate) you may travel to leave the country.

        If you take a test and it is positive for any variant of COVID you will be required to isolate for 10 days from the date of the test.

        Whether you take a test or not you may be contacted by the UK Test and Trace system at any time if it becomes apparent that you have been in contact with another case. This is very unlikely to happen before day 3 if it is in relation to your flight to UK. Depending on the suspected / identified variant for that case and if you are fully-vaccinated by an accepted programme (see below for links to what this means and valid exemptions) :
        • Omnicron or not fully-vaccinated: You will be required to isolated for 10 days, including a bar on travel to leave the country. A negative Day 2 test does not release you from this requirement.
          • Other and fully vaccinated : You will not be required to isolate.

Test Providers for Day 2/8 tests & Day 5 Test to release
This section is for FTers to post their experience with specific providers (good or bad). Keep it brief and to the point. Please mention how the service is provided and your FT name.

DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits arrived with me on time. Royal Mail slow for return. 5+ days for Day 2 result. #DaveS
DNA Workplace - Postal - Test kits both arrived on time, video of tests required, results by late evening Day 3 and Day 9. #TSE
ExpressTest Gatwick - Drive through - Tested early at 1000 a few times for TTR. Results came through in evening. #DaveS
NowTest - Postal - Day 2 kit arrived on time, day 8 did not. Will update with result arrival times when applicable. #wilsnunn
Collinson - Postal - Day 5 Test to Release kit arrived in time. Results and release by end of day 6. #tjcxx
CTM - Postal - Days 2/8 kits arrived together in time. Both sent results 2 days after posting. #tjcxx
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal -Day 2/8 kits arrived late. Results 3+ days from posting. #Gagravarr
Qured (Oncologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 and Day 8 result on Day 10 - happy customer! #EddLegll
Qured (Ocnologica) - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived on time. Day 2 result on Day 5 (after bedtime; ironically after my TTR result). #KSVVZ2015
Anglia DNA - Postal - Day 2/8 kits arrived early. (Both were labelled Day2). Results on Day 4 and Day 9. Cheapest on the list at the time, and good service/result. #tjcxx
Qured - Pre-flight test booked and bought through BA. Very efficient service. Highly recommended. #lhrsfo
Randox - Days 2 and 8. Booked two days before return, using BA discount. Kits already arrived on return. Slightly confusing instructions but manageable. Used Randox dropbox and results next day. Good. #lhrsfo
Randox - Day 2 (also used as pre departure test for a London to Milan flight). Used a drop box and results arrived at midnight the next day. #11101
Randox - Day 2 test centre - 2h30 queues outside the test centre in Waterloo. Results of antigen arrived 45 minutes later. #11101
Collinson - Test to Release at LHR T2. Good trip out! Very efficient service and well organised. Used BA discount. Results by end of day. Excellent. #lhrsfo
DAM - Test to Release in Fulham (they have many locations) - the cheapest fast turnaround TTR we have found. They promise 24 hours but in reality me, my wife, and my son (on different days) have received results inside of 12 hours. Very efficient staff as well. Princes outside of Central London as low as 99 GBP. Fulham is 129 GBP. #KSVVZ2015
Boots/Source Bioscience - days 2&8. Both packs sent in the same mail, waiting at the isolation address. Dropped off at postbox at 4pm, result back next day between 4 and 5 pm, very effective. Bought from Boots, £160, but same package sold directly bu Source Bioscience is just £120. Aaargh! Instructions said nasal and throat swabs, did only nasal and marked accordingly, no issues. #WilcoRoger
Collinsons/Stansted walkin TTR - test taken 1:30 pm, email with results 10:10 pm same day If the BA20OFF doesn't work (didn't work for us) there's another discount on the airport's site #WilcoRoger
Ordered Day-2 kit from Chronomics a week before our return for £18.99. Duly dispatched day we were returning to UK, so arrived on day following return. Reasonably simple process to do test and upload -ve result picture. Not sure where +ve result would have led to... #EsherFlyer
Hale Clinic testing centre (near Oxford Circus) - While not the least expensive, appoint schedules are accurate and results returned in promised timeframe. I've used the clinic for Day 2 tests (twice) and antigen test for US (once). I would def utilize again. #ecaarch
Halo at T5 (Sofitel) - Day 2 PCR spit test. Took the test 7pm, results arrived 7am the next day. No queues but a slightly awkward process to follow.

Useful data sources:

New cases per 100k - 7 days: https://covid19.who.int/table
New tests per 1000 - 7 days: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus-testing
Vaccination doses per 100: https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
Sequenced samples uploaded to GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/index.php?id=208
NHS Track & Trace data (positivity rates for arriving passengers are published every three weeks, so if you can't find the data in the current release it will be in one of the previous two) https://www.gov.uk/government/collec...weekly-reports https://assets.publishing.service.go...ut_week_50.ods
UK daily COVID data https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/?_ga...827.1594116739
Risk assessment methodology to inform international travel traffic light system
Data informing international travel traffic-light risk assessments


Testing Terminology
Notes which may assist with understanding which tests to use and with "reuse" of UK tests for other countries regulations:
  • LFT: Lateral Flow Test - A rapid antigen test using nasal / throat swab typically performed by the traveler at home, hotel, etc using simple disposable device. Usually tests the "outer shell" of the nucleus (which causes the symptoms and is reasonably stable across variants) and not the "spikes" (which allow new variants to invade more easily), so gives a positive result for many variants. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-...d_antigen_test)
  • PCR: Polymerase Chain Reaction - A laboratory based test which looks at the nucleus of the virus to determine which specific variant it is. After a positive LFT test ("I have some form of COVID") a PCR test ("You have the Gamma variant") allows identification and tracking of new variants to see if they are likely to become a "variant of concern". (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polymerase_chain_reaction)
  • NAAT: Nucleic Acid Amplification Test - A general class of laboratory based tests which includes PCR, LAMP, etc tests. (See https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...b/naats.html)
Print Wikipost

UK arrivals - pre-departure, quarantine and post-arrival [currently no requirements]

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2020, 10:21 am
  #4351  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,224
The key, whether it's airport testing, or a quarantine reduction programme, will be to get destinations off the FCO no-go list. It's that list which invalidates travel insurance and makes it very onerous to organise trips, whether for business or personally. Quarantine isn't so much of an issue when most are working from home principally, but having no insurance is a huge issue.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 10:30 am
  #4352  
FlyerTalk Evangelist, Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere between 0 and 13,000 metres high
Programs: AF/KL Life Plat, BA GGL+GfL, ALL Plat, Hilton Diam, Marriott Gold, blablablah, etc
Posts: 30,531
Originally Posted by 13901
7,000 cases and change today. Still, admissions to ICU are low (530 patients, +20ish/day) and 30-40 deaths a day. But I’m ready to bet that Italy will be added to the 14-day quarantine. Waiting to see what sort of egg Shapp’s task force will eventually lay.
Sadly, there are indeed many countries recording new "highest ever" numbers today: over 2000 in Portugal, 2,800 in Switzerland, over 4,000 in Romania, over 14,000 in Russia. We don't have the French figures yet but I am not optimistic, and Belgium reported 7,360, but their corrections are so huge at the moment that the reality for today is undoubtedly well above 10,000, possibly more, with a population of merely 10 millions. The UK itself reported 19,700+ which means that the total infection rate calculated tomorrow will be approaching 298 and bar a miracle, we'll undoubtedly break the sad 300 threshold tomorrow (ie on Friday's ECDC update).

What this means is that there is simply a discrepancy between what the current system was designed to/able to cope with/regulate and the current international pandemic reality, which will likely continue to worsen for the foreseeable future to make things worse, hence the eagerness from ABTA and others to see some magnitude of reaction - in all likelihood as well as the reluctance of authorities to provide too ambitious a change for fear that it would be unpopular given the restrictions that will undoubtedly be imposed domestically.
orbitmic is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 10:46 am
  #4353  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
Originally Posted by fransknorge
I understand the reasoning but this kills it. People are already not adhering to self-isolation so adding a price tag on top of it will not help.
Maybe for some but I know a few people myself included who would just add it to the cost of the trip and go. Hawaii is implementing a no quarantine pre-departure testing plan. Interested in see how that works out.
TomMM is online now  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 11:02 am
  #4354  
Community Director
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Norwich, UK
Programs: A3*G, BA Gold, BD Gold (in memoriam), IHG Diamond Ambassador
Posts: 8,477
Originally Posted by Dan1113
I'm confused at the Cyprus figure for today given their high(er) case numbers yesterday?
In the underlying data initially reported Cyprus was showing a zero for both yesterday and two days previously. There should be corrections later.
NWIFlyer is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 11:38 am
  #4355  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by corporate-wage-slave
Grant Shapps was speaking to the annual ABTA Travel Convention this morning. Normally this is held in some glamorous tourism location, this year it's been zoomed to virtuality. Mr. Shapps mentioned two thing they are working on for the international travel "taskforce". The first, which should be unveiled in a couple of weeks, is allowing early ending to self isolation after 1 week, by taking a test, and then being released if it proves negative. There will be some sort of rulebook around this, but ithe testing must be done via the private sector so as not to distract NHS Test and Trace. So that implies a £100 to £200 cost per trip. The other workstream is to look to a pre and post departure testing programme, agreed internationally, allowing multiple countries to participate in it, and would prevent quarantine altogether - this is the scheme the Wall Street Journal referred to at the weekend in order to the LHR-NYC route (NYLON) running again, but would require agreement on both sides to make it happen. The target for that to start up is 24 November but there are a lot of factors that get in the way of this.
Thanks for this update. It's a ray of hope! I still think the one week self-isolation requirement is too much for those of us who would want to make a short trip (business or leisure) to the UK. The pre- and post-departure testing programme with no quarantine requirement is a lot more attractive!

Originally Posted by fransknorge
I understand the reasoning but this kills it. People are already not adhering to self-isolation so adding a price tag on top of it will not help.
Originally Posted by DorsetKnob
As someone who would use it I disagree. It would be expensed anyway so not really a cost issue. Aside from which I’d rather go down the pub legally than illegally!
I would happily pay £100 - £200 per test if it meant I could either avoid or have a significantly reduced period of self-isolation when coming to the UK. Testing in the US is covered by my medical insurance but that aside it's still a small price to pay for the luxury of being able to travel.
JNelson113 and James91 like this.
Geordie405 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 11:55 am
  #4356  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,553
Originally Posted by NWIFlyer
In the underlying data initially reported Cyprus was showing a zero for both yesterday and two days previously. There should be corrections later.
Just had a look and it is actually just yesterday - the missing day from before was merged into another day, so in the data reported for the ecdc, two days' worth is under one day. But all the number totals match up (with the exception of yesterday's still being missing).

Cases down from yesterday and new measures in place as of today. Mostly a few small clusters on a small population, so despite the big jump tomorrow once these figures are in, hopefully CY will be safe in the review, especially given its low positivity and really effective test and trace system.

Last edited by Dan1113; Oct 14, 2020 at 12:17 pm
Dan1113 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 2:55 pm
  #4357  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,919
Originally Posted by Geordie405
Thanks for this update. It's a ray of hope! I still think the one week self-isolation requirement is too much for those of us who would want to make a short trip (business or leisure) to the UK. The pre- and post-departure testing programme with no quarantine requirement is a lot more attractive!





I would happily pay £100 - £200 per test if it meant I could either avoid or have a significantly reduced period of self-isolation when coming to the UK. Testing in the US is covered by my medical insurance but that aside it's still a small price to pay for the luxury of being able to travel.
the snag is the length of time you can have the virus without testing positive. It seems most people will test positive around day 4 or 5, but it seems some people can be a few days longer. It can be longer to show symptoms.
Silver Fox likes this.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 3:50 pm
  #4358  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: IAH
Programs: UA 1K 2.7MM, Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, IHG Spire
Posts: 3,317
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
the snag is the length of time you can have the virus without testing positive. It seems most people will test positive around day 4 or 5, but it seems some people can be a few days longer. It can be longer to show symptoms.
My understanding is that Finland has trained dogs to sniff and detect covid at 100% accuracy even before the virus shows up on a test. Could something like this be a solution to that issue?

Part of it is also accepting the fact that testing won't be perfect. A few infected people might get through the filter, but most should be screened out.
the810, James91 and vanillabean like this.

Last edited by JNelson113; Oct 14, 2020 at 3:59 pm
JNelson113 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 3:57 pm
  #4359  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,919
Originally Posted by JNelson113
My understanding is that Finland has trained dogs to sniff and detect covid at 100% accuracy even before the virus shows up on a test. Could something like this be a solution to that issue?
i have heard that as well. I have not seen how many days after infection the dogs can detect the virus.. If they can detect it 2 days after infection then it could be a big improvement.

I have no idea how long did it takes to train the dogs, nor if the UK has started that process yet. If its a few weeks great, lets start now, if its a few months then its more of a challenge
JNelson113 likes this.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 4:02 pm
  #4360  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,919
I have also read that in the UAE airports they using dogs to detect virus
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 4:02 pm
  #4361  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
the snag is the length of time you can have the virus without testing positive. It seems most people will test positive around day 4 or 5, but it seems some people can be a few days longer. It can be longer to show symptoms.
I understand this. I totally "get" that the test is going to be a point-in-time result, and that there's an incubation period, people can be asymptomatic etc. However, there has to be a line drawn somewhere. My view is that 14 days remains a massive disincentive to travel. I don't have a spare 14 days to self-isolate every time I come to the UK. Most of my trips are a week's duration, give or take - and therefore even 4 - 5 days of self-isolation would be excessive. I am also pretty sure I am not the only one in this boat.

However, I really don't see the point in the Government persisting with the requirement that visitors to the UK need to self-isolate for 14 days when the cat is well and truly out of the bag (so to speak) when it comes to domestic infection rates. I can just about bring myself to say that I agree with the concept of self-isolation when UK infection rates are very low and you're seeking to prevent transmission from those arriving from abroad (even if you can't truly quantify the risk because you're not testing people on arrival). However, where you have UK figures rapidly approaching 300 / 100k and where the cause is clearly inter-household mixing, students returning to university, people going to the pub before 10pm and so forth as opposed to people arriving from abroad I really don't see how the policy can be justified.

Now, of course, I may be totally wrong and we'd see tens of thousands of people suddenly flocking to the UK if the policy was scrapped, but I somehow doubt it.
Geordie405 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 4:07 pm
  #4362  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Krakow
Programs: BAEC Silver, Miles and More(FTL), IHG(Platinum), Accor, HHonors(Diamond), SPG, Hertz Five Star
Posts: 5,919
i think part of the problem with "stopping" quarantine when UK rates are high is what happens when you bring the UK rate down again, you reintroduce quarantine again?

I agree 14 days us an inconvenience, I typically have trips back t o the UK for 3 days, I can't do that now. 5 days or 7 days is a huge slice off 14 days. It may not help me, but if it is beneficial to others then that is great news.
Geordie405 likes this.
scottishpoet is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 4:44 pm
  #4363  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold; Hilton Honors Diamond
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
i think part of the problem with "stopping" quarantine when UK rates are high is what happens when you bring the UK rate down again, you reintroduce quarantine again?

I agree 14 days us an inconvenience, I typically have trips back t o the UK for 3 days, I can't do that now. 5 days or 7 days is a huge slice off 14 days. It may not help me, but if it is beneficial to others then that is great news.
There's no easy answer to the first question. In terms of the shorter period of self-isolation, that would definitely help. It would potentially mean I'd have fewer trips to the UK but would extend the length of those trips so that they'd be meaningful even taking into account the need to spend the first 4 - 5 days in glorious self-isolation. Whether or not I'd actually choose to travel to the UK is a totally different question altogether, but knowing I had the option to do so would be a step in the right direction.
LETTERBOY likes this.
Geordie405 is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 5:59 pm
  #4364  
exp
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Programs: DL, UA, AA, VS
Posts: 5,226
Originally Posted by florens
CH +2823 cases
positivity 13.6%
Incidence 176.4/100k
Is testing widely available or so limited that the positively rate is so high?
exp is offline  
Old Oct 14, 2020, 7:03 pm
  #4365  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 314
Originally Posted by scottishpoet
i think part of the problem with "stopping" quarantine when UK rates are high is what happens when you bring the UK rate down again, you reintroduce quarantine again?

I agree 14 days us an inconvenience, I typically have trips back t o the UK for 3 days, I can't do that now. 5 days or 7 days is a huge slice off 14 days. It may not help me, but if it is beneficial to others then that is great news.
Reducing the quarantine to 5-7 days, at least for me, would make a huge difference around the holidays. I do wish that they would look at alternatives related to testing. Because while it would benefit me as most of my trips are in the 10-14 day range, as you noted for people who are coming for a week or less it's not useful. I just dread to think what their infection rate will be in January if they don't do something soon. Because after this year, I don't see many people giving up Christmas with their families no matter what the government says.
Geordie405, DaveS and James91 like this.
Emma1420 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.