Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Possible Upgrade Irregularity

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 8:40 pm
  #31  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SJO
Programs: TA Platinum (Now LifeMiles Diamond), CO/CM Platinum. (Now UA Premier 1K) AMEX Platinum
Posts: 379
Originally Posted by hughw
But what seems a little strange in this case is that the passenger indicated two other passengers were brought forward by the FA just before departure.
I imagine when COInsider started looking into this, the Agents in question went to CYA mode, and the WX was as good as cover as they could have wished for. My guess is still that deadheading crew got the big seats and good meals while the lowly Silver got nothing for his loyalty until he brought up the "Possible Irregularity" on FT. I don't think there is anyway of knowing who got the OP's F seat or the other "empty" seat in F, but they were someone the FA was nice enough to invite up.
TacaCopaFlyer is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 8:53 pm
  #32  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: CO Gold
Posts: 52
Thanks, CO Insider!

Thank you, Scott. I appreciate the prompt response here and in my inbox. Keep up the good work!
MB_Reps is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 8:54 pm
  #33  
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: DCA
Programs: UA LT 1K, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titan, Avis PC, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,925
Us astute FlyerTalkers can assess a situation like this and analyze the likely irregularity. However, we are a very small % of the traveling Elites. So how many times does something like this happen?

Since the flight showed 15 out of 16 seats occupied after departure, there is the issue of why was this 1 seat left. The OP was upgraded and had an assigned FC seat. CO has a policy of "no FC left behind" a take off from an more famous slogan.

If there were deadheading crew - then they would be on the standby list and all 16 seats should have been taken.

This goes back to the issue of everyone on the flight should be accounted for, even crew, and all should have a boarding pass which agrees with the seat they are in. This is likley an FAA item, and not only should the GA get a demerit, CO could possibly get fined by the FAA.
cova is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 9:31 pm
  #34  
Company Representative, United Airlines
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, Houston, or somewhere in between
Posts: 2,176
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
BUT....if Larry had the EUA run and fill the seats (like 1 1/2 hours prior to departure), this wouldnt happen. WHY does CO wait until T-2seconds to even THINK about the UG list?????

~3 weeks ago I had to bug the snot out of a G/A to do the u/g list at EWR. He told me to "wait in the boarding area" and AFTER everyone was onboard, he would do the u/g list! This was on a 737 booked 7/12. WHY? Due to CO using the smallest bins possible, I would have no bin and would have to check my bag. Why not just DO YOUR JOB mr g/a and run the u/g list? You know why??? He was behind the counter on HIS CELL PHONE!!!!

So...if CO ran the u/g list..(or went to E500's/CR1's like UA ) these problems would be minimized. If we see 2 problems within 7 days...imagine how many times this REALLY happens???
Hi PhillyPhlyer40, in most cases, our Elite Upgrade Automation EUA) will clear up to the capacity of the front cabin. There's only a small handful of exceptions where this isn't the case, such as aircraft with a high swap probability, or aircraft where we need a handful of seats due to historical last-minute bookings. It's more important to us not to risk downgrading customers (especially after losing their choice main cabin seats), or accomodating a full-fare paying customer who invariably shows up three times out of five.

Whether EUA makes its last run at 3 hours or at 90 minutes, we don't that fundamentally solves our challenge. The true solution is for EUA to run in real time on the day of departure, and that's the goal we're currently considering.

Originally Posted by cova
With the flight delayed - there was plenty of time to give you your boarding pass. If the flight was delayed, then the upgrades should have been done at 10 minutes before scheduled departure time and then when you boarded late - your boarding pass would have beeped.

The lesson is that when flights are delayed the GA's need to finalized the list at the scheduled departure time when there are open FC seats.

Again - I think the entire process needs automated, regardless of flexibility described. When there are empty FC seats (unsold) at 10 minutes before departure or more like just before the boarding process begins - they should be cleared automatically by the system.

When the first FC boarding pass is scanned during boarding - that should trigger auto clearing of any open FC seats. Then when coach boards or Elites in coach the scanner will beep.
Hi cova, I know you're a fan of this approach, but in this case, we're not convinced it wouldn't have helped. Just because a flight was delayed doesn't mean we were sitting idly by. Delay situations are often a pressure cooker because of the added uncertainty and points of failure. Unseating confirmed First Class customers, especially during a fluid delay situation, is a process that's best handled on a case basis. The First Class cabin on this flight was booked full, all upgrades had been cleared. There were, however, three customers whose inbound flights were delayed but, in our judgement, were going to make their connection. On the last flight of the night, when all the nearby hotels were full, we felt this was a chance worth taking. In the end, we did release the seats within minutes of departure, printed the boarding passes for the next three customers on the upgrade standby list, and with an urgency to get the aircraft out, asked the cabin crew to handle the onboard upgrades.

Originally Posted by hughw
Scott, Normally I have zero issues with your explanations, and I can imagine that a rush to get a flight out can lead to forgotting to grab a passenger due a battlefield upgrade. But what seems a little strange in this case is that the passenger indicated two other passengers were brought forward by the FA just before departure. I understand that these may have been valid upgrades and the passenger got missed in the rush, but maybe again not.
Hi hughw, our cabin crew doesn't typically handle battlefield upgrades, so when they do, we're grateful for it. Based on what we know, the cabin crew was handed three First Class boarding passes for battlefield upgrades. With only two unoccupied seats in First Class, it appears that the first two boarding passes were dispensed and the third (belonging to MB_Reps) was not. At this late stage, and with the aircraft door now closed, this wasn't a discrepancy that we were in a position to resolve on the spot.
UA Insider is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 9:44 pm
  #35  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York NY
Programs: UA Gold, CO Plat, CO Million Miler
Posts: 2,698
Originally Posted by CO Insider
Hi [B]
Hi hughw, our cabin crew doesn't typically handle battlefield upgrades, so when they do, we're grateful for it. Based on what we know, the cabin crew was handed three First Class boarding passes for battlefield upgrades. With only two unoccupied seats in First Class, it appears that the first two boarding passes were dispensed and the third (belonging to MB_Reps) was not. At this late stage, and with the aircraft door now closed, this wasn't a discrepancy that we were in a position to resolve on the spot.
Thanks Scott. Makes sense. So the two persons brought up were proper upgrades, right? MB_Reps lost out because somehow there was someone occupying his seat that shouldn't have beem there (a poacher, or non-rev) and too late to sort out. That's understandable. I suppose conceivably no one was even in the seat, ever, and he just got lost in the shuffle.
hughw is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 9:56 pm
  #36  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Programs: CO Gold
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by hughw
But what seems a little strange in this case is that the passenger indicated two other passengers were brought forward by the FA just before departure. I understand that these may have been valid upgrades and the passenger got missed in the rush, but maybe again not.
Let me expound on this. Departure was originally scheduled for 6 PM, then changed to 7 PM. I think the agents had the pre-boarding passport verification around 6PM, that was when I asked if I was upgraded and received a negative response.

Boarding started at 6:30 PM. A few minutes after everyone boarded, the FA upgraded the 2 customers () I mentioned in the OP. One of them was an elite seated at 6A (I was behind him in the line and saw his boarding pass). I think he even remarked something like "that took you some time" (presumably the upgrade) to the FA.

Some minutes later, we got delayed further and we had the option of waiting it out in our seats or going out to wait at the gate or wherever. I stayed and just slept at 5F. When the passengers who waited outside boarded back, I noticed a passenger who was previously in F now in 5C. I overheard him mentioning to the FA (different from the 1st FA so let's call her FA 2) that he got downgraded. FA 2 said she will look into this issue. I was curious to see how it would turn out for 5C-previously-F guy but he was having a conversation with another passenger and I dozed off. I woke up in time, though, to see FA 2 telling 5C guy that he can go back to F.

At 8:38 PM, based on the flight status, we finally departed.
MB_Reps is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 10:05 pm
  #37  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Originally Posted by cova
Us astute FlyerTalkers can assess a situation like this and analyze the likely irregularity. However, we are a very small % of the traveling Elites. So how many times does something like this happen?
I'm sure very frequently. If we can pick up on it, it happens far more than we know about.

I've personally been a victim of these types of shenanigans twice, and picked up on it a handful of other times, and that was prior to the PDA site.

This also excludes people who discover it and don't report it, or those that discover it and report it, but WE CARE doesn't do anything about it. Most customers have no CO Insider channel, and WE CARE is usually focused on trying to disclaim respsonsibility so as to minimize compensation.
channa is offline  
Old Apr 28, 2009 | 11:16 pm
  #38  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Right Creek, AZ
Programs: UA Silver, AA Lifetime Gold, Marriott Lifetime Platinum
Posts: 593
I was coming through IAH last night, and with the nearly three hour ground stop they had, I can tell you that most of the evening flights were pretty messed up. I saw gate agents trying to reticket all kinds of funky misconnects, just to get them out.

I myself got out on my original connection, 2+ hours after original departure time, and was surprised to get an email alert this morning about my 7:25AM flight home. Apparently that still had me checked in on a protected flight, even though I was already home having morning coffee.

Could be very plausible that you were bumped because of someone with either a rev F seat, or higher status than you.

Truly, last night was not normal IAH ops, and I think you have to take this into consideration.
DesertFlier is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 5:24 am
  #39  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 107
Originally Posted by IAHtraveler
+3! Thanks for the clear explanation, Scott.




There are so many GAs & FAs (maybe someone from CO can say about how many) that Larry cannot physically watch each one at every boarding door. It doesn't matter what business you're in, you'll have people who try to "game" the system. You can't catch them all in interviews, either. It's just something that's natural and they will have to be reprimanded as they're found.



With your totally negative attitude on here, I don't think you'll be missed by many.



Correct; after the flight leaves, the stand-by list is removed from public view.
My negative attitude is none of your business. My opinion on the facts are all proven. I am a customer with CO and have the right to voice my opinion wether it is good or bad. Just beacause I don't suck up to CO means I have a bad attitude? All these supposed mistakes or shenanigans all caused by CO and not me. So who has the bad attitude? If you are going to complain about my attitude when I criticize CO and then what is this forum for? You get the good with the bad. Don't expect all roses on here.
Movieman123 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 6:42 am
  #40  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dilligaf
Posts: 474
Originally Posted by hughw
Thanks Scott. Makes sense. So the two persons brought up were proper upgrades, right? MB_Reps lost out because somehow there was someone occupying his seat that shouldn't have beem there (a poacher, or non-rev) and too late to sort out. That's understandable. I suppose conceivably no one was even in the seat, ever, and he just got lost in the shuffle.
According to Scott's response, the crew was handed three BP's, and there were only two FC seats. When the agents hand us these BP's, we don't know who is actually first. We just take the first one and go from there. Perhaps if the BP's were handed to us in order, this would help. The OP's BP was probably the last one in the stack. As was mentioned before, we don't normally handle these. I am glad to see that the OP was pleased with Scott's response to the situation.

Last edited by CALflyboi; Apr 29, 2009 at 6:50 am
CALflyboi is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 7:19 am
  #41  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York NY
Programs: UA Gold, CO Plat, CO Million Miler
Posts: 2,698
Originally Posted by CALflyboi
According to Scott's response, the crew was handed three BP's, and there were only two FC seats. When the agents hand us these BP's, we don't know who is actually first. We just take the first one and go from there. Perhaps if the BP's were handed to us in order, this would help. The OP's BP was probably the last one in the stack. As was mentioned before, we don't normally handle these. I am glad to see that the OP was pleased with Scott's response to the situation.
the mystery is then why were 3 boarding passes handed out for 2 FC seats. Understandable error or what?
hughw is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 9:30 am
  #42  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dilligaf
Posts: 474
Originally Posted by hughw
the mystery is then why were 3 boarding passes handed out for 2 FC seats. Understandable error or what?
Yes, an error. Though not one that you may understand unless you are the working agent. I have had this happen before. The agent will come down to upgrade people, and they will actually have more upgrades than there are seats. Yet, all those people already in the FC seats were actually supposed to be in them.
CALflyboi is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 9:44 am
  #43  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,529
Originally Posted by Movieman123
My negative attitude is none of your business. My opinion on the facts are all proven. I am a customer with CO and have the right to voice my opinion wether it is good or bad. Just beacause I don't suck up to CO means I have a bad attitude? All these supposed mistakes or shenanigans all caused by CO and not me. So who has the bad attitude? If you are going to complain about my attitude when I criticize CO and then what is this forum for? You get the good with the bad. Don't expect all roses on here.
I have to speak up on this one. Your comments were basically "blame Larry" and that he lets the FAs and GAs do anything. You can't prove either one as a fact, and "an opinion on the facts are all proven" makes no sense grammatically or practically.

I don't s-ck up to Continental either, but your tirade against Continental in this particular thread has nothing to do with this thread. It does not provide proof of your "facts" (except perhaps that you will fly Cathay Pacific to Asia), and doesn't help the OP or any of us understand the situation behind the upgrade issue.
aacharya is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 5:37 pm
  #44  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,437
Originally Posted by CALflyboi
Yes, an error. Though not one that you may understand unless you are the working agent. I have had this happen before. The agent will come down to upgrade people, and they will actually have more upgrades than there are seats. Yet, all those people already in the FC seats were actually supposed to be in them.




WRONG.


CO can not "double book" seats on finalization. Can NOT, will NOT happen.


Lets get that out of the way. Lets not blame an "extra boarding pass".
PhillyPhlyer40 is offline  
Old Apr 29, 2009 | 5:52 pm
  #45  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DEN
Programs: UA MM Plat; AA MM Gold; HHonors Diamond
Posts: 15,891
Has anyone explained this yet?

Upgrade Standby List:
Capacity: 16 | Booked: 15 | Checked In: 15


(The OP noted this after the flight...).
Bonehead is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.