Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Expect more diversions"

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 4:20 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: IAH, LGA or EWR
Programs: CO MM/Pt, SPG Pt, Marriott Au, others not worth mentioning
Posts: 187
"Expect more diversions"

So I'm sitting in the PC at LGA waiting on 1832 to land so it can become 1433 to take me home (3 hour delay and counting). There are storms in the general DC area, so ATC in New York is in shambles, again, despite a relatively good day here in the City proper. What's interesting about this is that the agent here indicated that "the airlines" are starting to put less fuel onboard to save weight, and that she was seeing more diversions, rather than planes circling.

I am sure that someone has done the necessary fuel burn calculations of what a plane would burn circling vs. a landing/takeoff cycle (plus the probabilities thereof), so the concept here does not shock me. I am more curious whether other FTers have actually experienced this, or is this something that may be limited to the horrendously congested NE corridor (esp. NYC)?
CO_1mm is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 6:31 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northern NJ
Programs: CO OnePass Platinum
Posts: 67
Happened to me on a LAS-DFW flight on AA the other day for the very same reason - less fuel loaded to save weight, according to the crew. Took a detour to OKC when an unpredected storm at DFW popped up.
hoffmanj is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 7:25 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
50 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Floating around
Programs: UA Plat (1MM), DL Gold (1MM), Marriott LTT
Posts: 11,218
Actually this has been discussed in length already (you can probably do a search and find it).

Interestingly, every article I've read mentions CO specifically as practicing the "bring as little fuel as possible" mantra. I haven't been on one of the diverted CO flights (cause most of my flying is on NW) but I have coworkers who have been on several of them. As soon as a plane can't land at it's destination (e.g. EWR or IAH), it will circle for up to 10 minutes and then divert. SEA-IAH was diverted to AUS. SEA-EWR was diverted to SWF or PHL.

As mentioned, most of my flying is on NW and I've had to circle a few times near MSP (in and of itself a rarity). We circled for up to 25 minutes with no problem and still made it to MSP. While I'm pretty sure almost all carriers are flying with less fuel to save weight and ultimately save fuel, it hasn't affected me directly yet.

I definitely expect more diversions, especially for planes going to EWR - still the most delayed airport in the country. With many airlines cutting service it remains to be seen how this will affect ORD, LGA, EWR, JFK and the other delay prone airports. Will they actually get back to a normal level of service? That alone will save a ton of fuel for the airlines, especially CO, UA, AA and DL.

-RM
RobOnLI is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2008 | 8:14 pm
  #4  
yad
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Programs: CO Plat
Posts: 379
Any insight into what typically happens from a pax perspective on these diversions? How long does it take to get back in the air and to your final destination? Is it typically possible to just get out at the diversion point and find your own way home?
yad is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 8:31 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: MHT
Programs: CO-Gold, various hotel
Posts: 47
Originally Posted by yad
Any insight into what typically happens from a pax perspective on these diversions? How long does it take to get back in the air and to your final destination? Is it typically possible to just get out at the diversion point and find your own way home?
A lot will depend on why you had to circle in the first place. Odds are, now that you are landed you are going to be held by ATC from taking off until things have cleared up a bit. We all know that can be a while... Just the land, taxi to get fuel, and take off again (no going to a gate) isn't a huge thing - if staff is available, and depending if de-icing is needed.

Regarding getting out at the diversion point. I've been on a Europe to EWR that diverted to Montreal, and it was made pretty clear that no one was getting off (despite the 6 hour wait).

I've been diverted on an RJ from CLE to Cincinnati and they did actually let someone off, but it definitely took some persuading by the Pilot, and could only be done because they had enough time and available ground crew to come over and get them. I don't remember if they got their luggage or not, though (if they had any). They would not want to risk losing a takeoff slot if they thought there was even a slight chance of getting it anytime soon, though.
dgc03052 is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 4:14 pm
  #6  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin Texas USA
Programs: UA Gold MM
Posts: 158
I got diverted from IAH to HOU (Houston Hobby) last week due to thunderstorms at IAH -- we didn't circle long before the decision was made. They did let people off at HOU. Diversions generally take a long time (this was 4 hours) because there is a long queue of planes that need to be refueled at the same time and then, of course, waiting to get back in the queue for landing back at IAH. Once we were airborne it was just a few minutes to IAH -- reminding me of my EFD days!
dmkorten is offline  
Old Jun 28, 2008 | 5:24 pm
  #7  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Silver, IHG Plat AMB, Hertz Pres. Circle, Avis Presidents Club; Caesars Diamond Plus
Posts: 656
Unhappy

Originally Posted by dmkorten
I got diverted from IAH to HOU (Houston Hobby) last week due to thunderstorms at IAH -- we didn't circle long before the decision was made. They did let people off at HOU. Diversions generally take a long time (this was 4 hours) because there is a long queue of planes that need to be refueled at the same time and then, of course, waiting to get back in the queue for landing back at IAH. Once we were airborne it was just a few minutes to IAH -- reminding me of my EFD days!

I miss EFD!!
One time the flight to IAH was cancelled and they put us in a van. I thought I was in a Tijuana taxi. The guy got us to the front door of Terminal C in 40 minutes!
lindaiah is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.