Charge for pet in cabin
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
Charge for pet in cabin
Hello, all,
Hoping CO Insider will read this.
Why does CO charge so much for bringing a pet along in the passenger cabin?
My wife is scheduled to travel with our small (<10 lb.) puppy. CO is charging us $190.00 for the dog. The carrier fits easily under the seat.
I'm not mad or anything about this charge, just wondering why it's so much.
(By the way, NW charges $160.00)
Thanks and safe travels.
Hoping CO Insider will read this.
Why does CO charge so much for bringing a pet along in the passenger cabin?
My wife is scheduled to travel with our small (<10 lb.) puppy. CO is charging us $190.00 for the dog. The carrier fits easily under the seat.
I'm not mad or anything about this charge, just wondering why it's so much.
(By the way, NW charges $160.00)
Thanks and safe travels.
#2
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
I've taken a pet along on a trip in the cabin in the not too distant past on CO. I am very grateful that CO permits this, but I side with you: I think the cost is extremely high. Sure, I can understand charging "something" as an insurance policy or the like, but $190/RT for what is virtually indistinguishable from a legal, carry-on bag is all but larcenous in my opinion. My pet did not make a peep. Aside from the specially-made ventilated bag, no one would otherwise know that I even have a pet therein. To the OP who posed the question, "why does CO charge so much?", I'd hazard the guess: simply because they can.
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
I've taken a pet along on a trip in the cabin in the not too distant past on CO. I am very grateful that CO permits this, but I side with you: I think the cost is extremely high. Sure, I can understand charging "something" as an insurance policy or the like, but $190/RT for what is virtually indistinguishable from a legal, carry-on bag is all but larcenous in my opinion. My pet did not make a peep. Aside from the specially-made ventilated bag, no one would otherwise know that I even have a pet therein. To the OP who posed the question, "why does CO charge so much?", I'd hazard the guess: simply because they can.
Thanks for your reply.
#4


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
Jet Blue is $50 OW.
#6
Company Representative, United Airlines
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago, Houston, or somewhere in between
Posts: 2,176
Hello, all,
Hoping CO Insider will read this.
Why does CO charge so much for bringing a pet along in the passenger cabin?
My wife is scheduled to travel with our small (<10 lb.) puppy. CO is charging us $190.00 for the dog. The carrier fits easily under the seat.
I'm not mad or anything about this charge, just wondering why it's so much.
(By the way, NW charges $160.00)
Thanks and safe travels.
Hoping CO Insider will read this.
Why does CO charge so much for bringing a pet along in the passenger cabin?
My wife is scheduled to travel with our small (<10 lb.) puppy. CO is charging us $190.00 for the dog. The carrier fits easily under the seat.
I'm not mad or anything about this charge, just wondering why it's so much.
(By the way, NW charges $160.00)
Thanks and safe travels.
Last edited by UA Insider; Oct 11, 2007 at 11:58 am Reason: clarification
#7
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SRQ-NYC-DCA
Programs: OnePass Infinite CO MM, PC Charter Lifer SkyMiles GM, MileagePlus
Posts: 1,826
Pets through security
I know for a fact that many pet carry ons are not declared
Thereby they are not counted or paid for either
It would be simple if ALL security points checked for
pet credentials and PAID tickets
My vote (if they ever took a vote) would be to eliminate
all onboard animals (with 2 or more legs)
Thereby they are not counted or paid for either
It would be simple if ALL security points checked for
pet credentials and PAID tickets
My vote (if they ever took a vote) would be to eliminate
all onboard animals (with 2 or more legs)
#8
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
Hi guloxi, the revenues are important, but there's a little more to it. When it comes to in-cabin pets, this is a product that is very limited in supply (only two per aircraft) and it's one that many of our customers wish we didn't offer. Our pricing is therefore designed to match our limited supply with the demand. And to some degree it also serves as a deterrent. While we're very proud to offer this service, we do have to keep into account the additional liability and exposure to issues it creates.
I wonder if CO would consider giving Elite OP members a break on the price, or possibly the option of paying with miles.
Thanks, again.
#9
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 193
I was on a recent SFO-IAH flight with a small dog which "yipped" most of the way--it was quite annoying having paid for my A ticket. If your dog does bark or get anxious, please be kind to your fellow passengers and see if your vet with give you something to help sedate the poor animal. And I AM a dog owner--I kennel mine--but realize your situation may be different.
#11


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
Hi guloxi, the revenues are important, but there's a little more to it. When it comes to in-cabin pets, this is a product that is very limited in supply (only two per aircraft) and it's one that many of our customers wish we didn't offer. Our pricing is therefore designed to match our limited supply with the demand. And to some degree it also serves as a deterrent. While we're very proud to offer this service, we do have to keep into account the additional liability and exposure to issues it creates.
You did mean 5 pets per aircraft, right
. I believe it used to be 2.One pet per flight is allowed in the front cabin (select aircraft only).
Four pets per flight are allowed in the Economy cabin (Continental Airlines, Continental Micronesia and Continental Express flights only).
#12
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
I was on a recent SFO-IAH flight with a small dog which "yipped" most of the way--it was quite annoying having paid for my A ticket. If your dog does bark or get anxious, please be kind to your fellow passengers and see if your vet with give you something to help sedate the poor animal. And I AM a dog owner--I kennel mine--but realize your situation may be different.
I also agree that kenneling is the best option, but it just didn't work out this time. As the dog gets older, that is what we'll be doing.
Thanks for the response
#14
Join Date: Mar 2005
Programs: US Silver Preferred
Posts: 133
I do travel with my pet from time to time and understand charging a fee for this service. That said, often these fees border on the outrageous. Often the charges to fly a pet can be nearly the same as a person (on a cheap X fare). For this amount, the pet should receive its own seat! Furthermore, and perhaps the thing that irks me more, is that the pet counts as my carry-on bag even though I had to pay an extra fee. Are those pax bringing along lap children (which can be infinitely more annoying in-flight than most pets) also not allowed a carry-on bag? My line of thinking is that if I'm paying an extra "fare" for the privilege of flying my pet, why am I also penalized by having the pet counted as my carry-on? It's simply adding insult to injury...
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Petaluma, CA, USA
Programs: DL FO MM,
Posts: 102
I know for a fact that many pet carry ons are not declared
Thereby they are not counted or paid for either
It would be simple if ALL security points checked for
pet credentials and PAID tickets
My vote (if they ever took a vote) would be to eliminate
all onboard animals (with 2 or more legs)
Thereby they are not counted or paid for either
It would be simple if ALL security points checked for
pet credentials and PAID tickets
My vote (if they ever took a vote) would be to eliminate
all onboard animals (with 2 or more legs)
Did you mean more than 2 legs?
Of course, I've been on many trips where some of the two-legged animals probably should have been in kennels.
Wouldn't the GA know from the BP if the passenger had actually paid to bring a pet on board?
Thanks for your response.
Last edited by guloxi; Oct 11, 2007 at 10:40 am Reason: Edited for spelling/grammar





