Why did CO do it this way?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
Why did CO do it this way?
I am on a flight (1800) from FLL to EWR this afternoon and I just got a trip alert message stating that the flight will be late for about an hour.
I was puzzled by this because I checked this morning and found out that the inbound aircraft was FL75 from HAM then became FL301 and then FL1800. FL75 was only about 10 minutes late coming in. So I checked again and found out that the inbound flight has become FL97 from TXL then 301 the 1800. FL 97 was scheduled orginally to arrive at 12:30pm which would be late for 301 scheduled departing time of 1:10pm anyway. Odd...
There's another flight (1700) from FLL to EWR an hour after 1800. The inbound flight for that is FL69 from ARN then FL1601 then 1700. And FL69 arrived early. As a result of it, FL 1700 will arrive earlier than 1800 according to co.com.
I was wonderful why CO didn't use FL69 as FL301 to reduce the delay (probably won't be any delay at all). The planes are both 757-200 w BF seats so the config are the same. FL 1800 usually has some intl connecting passengers. With delay, it means trouble. If it can be avoided, why not?
Sorry for my ignorance if there are a lot of things behind. It would be nice to know though.
CJ
I was puzzled by this because I checked this morning and found out that the inbound aircraft was FL75 from HAM then became FL301 and then FL1800. FL75 was only about 10 minutes late coming in. So I checked again and found out that the inbound flight has become FL97 from TXL then 301 the 1800. FL 97 was scheduled orginally to arrive at 12:30pm which would be late for 301 scheduled departing time of 1:10pm anyway. Odd...
There's another flight (1700) from FLL to EWR an hour after 1800. The inbound flight for that is FL69 from ARN then FL1601 then 1700. And FL69 arrived early. As a result of it, FL 1700 will arrive earlier than 1800 according to co.com.
I was wonderful why CO didn't use FL69 as FL301 to reduce the delay (probably won't be any delay at all). The planes are both 757-200 w BF seats so the config are the same. FL 1800 usually has some intl connecting passengers. With delay, it means trouble. If it can be avoided, why not?
Sorry for my ignorance if there are a lot of things behind. It would be nice to know though.
CJ
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Perhaps they used that aircraft for a different flight that would have had a larger downline impact?
Say EWR-FLL terminates in FLL and spends the night there, but EWR-SFO turns around in an hour and becomes a redeye SFO-EWR, if CO has to delay one of those, they're better off delaying FLL and getting SFO out on time if possible.
Say EWR-FLL terminates in FLL and spends the night there, but EWR-SFO turns around in an hour and becomes a redeye SFO-EWR, if CO has to delay one of those, they're better off delaying FLL and getting SFO out on time if possible.
#3


Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Homosassa, FL & Ringwood, NJ -UA-G(Lifetime); SPG-Plat (Lifetime)
Posts: 6,122
Originally Posted by cj0119
I am on a flight (1800) from FLL to EWR this afternoon and I just got a trip alert message stating that the flight will be late for about an hour.
I was puzzled by this because I checked this morning and found out that the inbound aircraft was FL75 from HAM then became FL301 and then FL1800. FL75 was only about 10 minutes late coming in. So I checked again and found out that the inbound flight has become FL97 from TXL then 301 the 1800. FL 97 was scheduled orginally to arrive at 12:30pm which would be late for 301 scheduled departing time of 1:10pm anyway. Odd...
There's another flight (1700) from FLL to EWR an hour after 1800. The inbound flight for that is FL69 from ARN then FL1601 then 1700. And FL69 arrived early. As a result of it, FL 1700 will arrive earlier than 1800 according to co.com.
I was wonderful why CO didn't use FL69 as FL301 to reduce the delay (probably won't be any delay at all). The planes are both 757-200 w BF seats so the config are the same. FL 1800 usually has some intl connecting passengers. With delay, it means trouble. If it can be avoided, why not?
Sorry for my ignorance if there are a lot of things behind. It would be nice to know though.
CJ
I was puzzled by this because I checked this morning and found out that the inbound aircraft was FL75 from HAM then became FL301 and then FL1800. FL75 was only about 10 minutes late coming in. So I checked again and found out that the inbound flight has become FL97 from TXL then 301 the 1800. FL 97 was scheduled orginally to arrive at 12:30pm which would be late for 301 scheduled departing time of 1:10pm anyway. Odd...
There's another flight (1700) from FLL to EWR an hour after 1800. The inbound flight for that is FL69 from ARN then FL1601 then 1700. And FL69 arrived early. As a result of it, FL 1700 will arrive earlier than 1800 according to co.com.
I was wonderful why CO didn't use FL69 as FL301 to reduce the delay (probably won't be any delay at all). The planes are both 757-200 w BF seats so the config are the same. FL 1800 usually has some intl connecting passengers. With delay, it means trouble. If it can be avoided, why not?
Sorry for my ignorance if there are a lot of things behind. It would be nice to know though.
CJ

