Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > Continental OnePass (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

Comments by Larry outside of his presentation

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Comments by Larry outside of his presentation

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 5:50 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: A Capital City on The East Coast
Programs: CO-Dirt,SPG-Nothing,Marriott-Gold, Hilton-Blue, Hyatt-Plat, HI-Plat
Posts: 6,872
Originally Posted by LAXPlat
Also, unfortunately, don't look for any more new European cities this year (I know this was covered in the regular Q & A, but I reconfirmed it with Larry in person, in a more detailed, if brief, discussion of international expansion).
I gathered from the Q&A that there "might" (read heavy on the MIGHT BE) an announcement of perhaps 1 new destination
windwalker is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 6:36 pm
  #17  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: EWR (Wayne Township, NJ) and PHX
Programs: CO OnePass Plat and SPG - Plat, Marriott Plat (don't use -it's a comp), AmericaWest CP
Posts: 4,810
Originally Posted by martinplas
Question:Will you ever update the Buiz First to a lie flat bed like BA and Virgin
Answer: It takes up more room and we would have less seats to sell

Thats the short answer - the longer answer includes they will sell what people will / do pay for the current BF product sells, why mess with it too much?

-Vincent
vincom is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 6:52 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: San Fran
Posts: 325
Originally Posted by vincom
the current BF product sells, why mess with it too much?

-Vincent
Uh, I dunno, perhaps to strive for the best possible product; or to gain a competative advantage; or attept to strategically place yourself ahead of the competition; or...
Resting on one's laurels seems like a poor way to approach one's premium product.
rapopoda is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 8:18 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Frisco (Dallas area), TX
Programs: UA Lifetime 1K (MM), AA Lifetime Platinum (MM), Marriott Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Diamond,
Posts: 268
I agree but feel it necessary to add the following: During both Gordon's and Larry's tenure, CO has (almost) always been a step ahead of the curve, particularly regarding its premium product. That said, BF is a niche product designed for the majority of premium fliers who want as close to a First Class experience possible but still remain at a J/D/Z class fare (whether due to their own budget preference or their company's travel policy). CO delivers this price/value brilliantly.

Do they need to evolve and stay ahead of the curve???...absolutely, but within the constraints of the BF economics which is CO's winning hand. After this past weekend, I am even more confident they will continue to.



Originally Posted by rapopoda
Uh, I dunno, perhaps to strive for the best possible product; or to gain a competative advantage; or attept to strategically place youri agree self ahead of the competition; or...
Resting on one's laurels seems like a poor way to approach one's premium product.
CUSTOMDIRECT is offline  
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 10:30 pm
  #20  
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: EWR (Wayne Township, NJ) and PHX
Programs: CO OnePass Plat and SPG - Plat, Marriott Plat (don't use -it's a comp), AmericaWest CP
Posts: 4,810
Originally Posted by rapopoda
Uh, I dunno, perhaps to strive for the best possible product; or to gain a competative advantage; or attept to strategically place yourself ahead of the competition; or...
Resting on one's laurels seems like a poor way to approach one's premium product.
Clearly Continental is concerned with upgrading the product, but in all reality the current product sells WELL. They have plans to introduce newer seats, AVOD, and etc etc. Unlike other airlines Continental do not have the ability to take planes out of service for such things, as Larry said they work it into planned service or heavy checks on the planes. You can't argue with that, every time a plane is out of service that plane is not producing revenue.

When I said why mess with it too much - I meant it currently sells and can compete against many other airline's product. This of course is no reason to not upgrade, but it is also a good enough reason to not take the entire international fleet out of service to install new seats over night. By the time they will start to feel much more heat from the competition, they will have already started retrofitting the 777/767 fleet with a newer BF product. (to match the 752 BF).

-Vincent
vincom is offline  
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 5:46 pm
  #21  
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Houston, TX, USA
Programs: UA Platinum, AA Lifetime Platinum, DL Platinum, Honors Diamond, Bonvoy Ambassador, Hertz Platinum
Posts: 8,179
Originally Posted by cova
There likely are not any of CO's version of the 777 (the 777-200ER) available for lease that has the same engines etc. What is available is likely the older non-ER version in a different configuration. CO has on order 2 more 777-200ER's for delivery in 2007 to add to its existing fleet of 18 777's.

CO opt'ed for the 777-200ER for these additional 2 (rather than a newer longer range version - the 777-200LR) for fleet commonality.
In my opinion, this is one of the smartest things that CO has done. I'm sure it has been tempting to pick up some 777s (if not other aircraft) on the cheap and dedicate them to specific routes, but CO has not done so. They are restricted to the 777-200ER with the GE engines which perhaps they only can buy new, but they have great fleet flexibility as a result.
Steve M is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.