Discrepancy between EQM and Mileage Posted
Jan 18, 2004 | 4:33 pm
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
Discrepancy between EQM and Mileage Posted
I have one (1) segment credited YTD so far:
CONTINENTAL 0749 XT SAN FRANCISCO-NEW YORK 2,565
2004 Elite Mileage: 2,564
Nothing worth crying over, but if down to the wire in December, times a few segements, it could add up.
Anyone else notice any other discrepancies?
CONTINENTAL 0749 XT SAN FRANCISCO-NEW YORK 2,565
2004 Elite Mileage: 2,564
Nothing worth crying over, but if down to the wire in December, times a few segements, it could add up.
Anyone else notice any other discrepancies?
Jan 19, 2004 | 9:02 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 27,887
No, but I have noticed that the mileage listed on co.com when you make a reservation is often less than what is posted to the account, sometimes by 10-20 miles, which can certainly mean the difference between the next status level and not, particularly if you plan your travel around these "advertised" mileages.
Jan 19, 2004 | 9:21 pm
#3
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by ijgordon:
No, but I have noticed that the mileage listed on co.com when you make a reservation is often less than what is posted to the account, sometimes by 10-20 miles, which can certainly mean the difference between the next status level and not, particularly if you plan your travel around these "advertised" mileages.</font>
No, but I have noticed that the mileage listed on co.com when you make a reservation is often less than what is posted to the account, sometimes by 10-20 miles, which can certainly mean the difference between the next status level and not, particularly if you plan your travel around these "advertised" mileages.</font>