Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Katrina to Kill Continental This Year?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 9:10 am
  #16  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Alexandria, VA, USA NW Platinum Elite Since 1999, United GoldMM, Hyatt Discoverist, SPG Gold, Hilton Diamond, Hertz #1 Gold, IC Ambassador
Posts: 7,451
Originally Posted by bocastephen
CO is going to be pinched, like everyone else, but they are in the best financial position of the majors
I guess my question is ... CO has already been through BK and thats how they streamlined their operation. With BK, before Oct that is, both DL and NW will be able to shed their pensions and probably obtain more cuts from the unions. Gas prices will always be variable, but they will have lowered a major part of their fixed costs. It will be interesting to see how this all plays out... I predict DL BK the week after Labor day... and NW BK by the end of Sept.
thezipper is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 9:13 am
  #17  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Houston, Texas
Programs: CO Silver
Posts: 2,600
Originally Posted by mbreuer
I doubt it... they won't go before NW, Delta, etc. The fuel prices affect everyone except for Southwest. Southwest doesn't have enough capacity to meet overall travel demand, and if they did I doubt they have enough fuel futures to account for increased capacity. Look for reductions in service on airlines/aircraft with the highest fuel costs (Like NW DC9s). Fewer available seats will lead to higher fares. CO should be OK in that scenario. Not sure about NW or DL.
I guess my sarcasm wasn't obvious enough.
IAH_FLYER is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 9:36 am
  #18  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PEK
Programs: Alas, the Gravy Train Hath Ended...just happy to be an OW Sapphire and a ST Ivory...whatever
Posts: 4,389
Originally Posted by otralot
SW can't lose in this situation. If fuel costs rise for other airlines their's don't They can compete agresively on fares and hurt their competitiors.
I don't think that they are competing aggressively at all. I was looking at flights from MAF-HOU, and WN was at least $20 more than CO, and IAH is a lot more convenient for me, not to mention safer.

I have my elite for next year, and I would like to fly WN a bit more to get the RR certificate, but I just can't bring myself to get on one of their planes.
theblakefish is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 10:33 am
  #19  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,955
I am not sire where the saftey information comes from but if SW is getting $20 per ticket and paying less for fuel then they are in fact doing better then CO>
otralot is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 1:24 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Programs: CO Gold; SPG Gold***; AvisFirst;
Posts: 3,970
Originally Posted by IAH_FLYER
I guess my sarcasm wasn't obvious enough.
guess not... I usually detect sarcasm.
mbreuer is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 2:09 pm
  #21  
xFF
 
Join Date: May 2004
Programs: UA lifetime 1K
Posts: 2,033
Originally Posted by IAH_FLYER
n.b. this topic reminds me of something you'd see on FoxNews.
Only there it would be "Fuel costs are like shark attacks: everyone's susceptible, even musclemen like Continental Airlines. But, first, this message..."
xFF is offline  
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 9:02 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin, Tx, USA
Posts: 229
WN Fuel Hedges

If I remember correctly, most of Southwest's fuel hedges expire relatively soon. Anyone know for sure?

And once that happens, at least ONE component of cost is more level.
Enhanced in Austin is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 12:21 am
  #23  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by Enhanced in Austin
If I remember correctly, most of Southwest's fuel hedges expire relatively soon. Anyone know for sure?

And once that happens, at least ONE component of cost is more level.
Not exactly. WN will enjoy a very large cost advantage next year and smaller, but still substantial, advantages through 2009.

The Company remains approximately 85 percent hedged for the second half of 2005 at $26 per barrel; approximately 65 percent in 2006 at $32 per barrel; over 45 percent in 2007 at $31 per barrel; 30 percent in 2008 at $33 per barrel; and over 25 percent in 2009 at $35 per barrel.
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix....041&highlight=
FWAAA is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 1:12 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Programs: UA Gold MM; AA Gold MM; WN A-List; IHG Diamond Ambassador; Marriott Gold; Hyatt Explorist
Posts: 24,564
Originally Posted by HMizzle
I still think there should be a cap put on profits for the oil companies. That and we need to make it easier for companies to build more refineries. There is so much red tape it is damn near impossible and or costly to build a new refinery.
Interesting. These two positions seem to be the offspring of radically different ideologies. On one hand, the anti-oil company notion of capping their profits. On the other, the environmentally unfriendly desire for the proliferation of oil refineries.

With regard to your suggestion of a profit cap, may I (hypothetically) inquire as to what industry and, perhaps even more specifically, what business you work in? Because I'm sure you'd agree that those profits should be capped as well.

I hate expensive gas. But sometimes we need very loud alarm bells and red flags to warn us that it is a very finite resource. I suppose that's the silver lining with regard to our petroleum predicament.

On topic . . . CO will most certainly survive the year. And, in all likelihood, many years to come.
SAT Lawyer is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 10:38 am
  #25  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
40 Countries Visited
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Southwest Desert, under a rock, watch out! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<" You can get there, but it's gonna cost you!
Programs: Previously NonePass, now UA 1K (*Enhanced*)
Posts: 4,248
Originally Posted by cAAl
..................................
On topic . . . CO will most certainly survive the year. And, in all likelihood, many years to come.
I agree with the first statment, but after the year end my crystal ball gets a little cloudy. Once apon a time (and it wasn't that long ago) Delta was considered to be the big gorrilla in the airline industry due to it's large cash reserves.

One can only guess what's gonna happen to fuel prices, and according to the National Hurricane Center:

"NOAA Raises the 2005 Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook,
Bulk of This Season's Storms Still to Come"

This is extra bad news since they've already used up the bulk of storm names for 2005, there's only 8 names left!
  • [*]
  • [*]
  • [*]
  • [*]
  • [*]
  • [*]
  • [*]
snake is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 12:10 pm
  #26  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Programs: UA 1K, CO One Pass Nothing, SPG Gold
Posts: 580
Originally Posted by cAAl
Interesting. These two positions seem to be the offspring of radically different ideologies. On one hand, the anti-oil company notion of capping their profits. On the other, the environmentally unfriendly desire for the proliferation of oil refineries.

With regard to your suggestion of a profit cap, may I (hypothetically) inquire as to what industry and, perhaps even more specifically, what business you work in? Because I'm sure you'd agree that those profits should be capped as well.

I hate expensive gas. But sometimes we need very loud alarm bells and red flags to warn us that it is a very finite resource. I suppose that's the silver lining with regard to our petroleum predicament.

On topic . . . CO will most certainly survive the year. And, in all likelihood, many years to come.
Don't get me wrong...I feel like some sort of profit cap is only needed as a temporary measure. Alot of gas companies are profiteering and that is just wrong. Case in point...the day after the hurricane there was no shortage of gas, the true shortages won't show up for another week or so, and gas jumped up by 60 cents easily here in KC. That is simply playing on peoples fears to get more money.

I'm not asking for oil refineries to be built everywhere either, but alot of people don't understand that we barely had enough refineries before the hurricane, and many more don't know that the last refinery was built something like 25 years ago. We don't have an oil shortage, we have a lack of means to turn oil into useful products. If we can eliminate some of the red tape and make it a bit easier and more worthwhile to build a refinery or two it would greatly benefit us.

To get back on the topic of CO...while the initial shock of Katrina well hurt the airlines, CO may actually see a long term gain. With all the ports along the gulf destroyed business is going to shift to Houston and other Texas ports which of course comes with business travelers.

All I can say is that I hope things in NO get under control soon.

Matt
HMizzle is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 1:16 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SDF
Posts: 3,302
Originally Posted by HMizzle
Alot of gas companies are profiteering and that is just wrong.
Is it really profiteering? I think it's just basic ECON 101 and supply & demand. There's a decrease in supply (partly a real decrease, partly perceived) and gas stations can price a gallon at $3.50 and still sell all of their gas. Why shouldn't you be allowed to sell gas at whatever price you want if people are still buying it?

If you're so angry that they make so much money off of you, stop buying their gas.
mtparadis is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 3:17 pm
  #28  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Clinging to the edifices of a decadent past from the biggest city in America nobody really cares about.
Programs: (ಠ_ಠ)
Posts: 9,077
Yeep.

Originally Posted by mtparadis
...I think it's just basic ECON 101 and supply & demand...
You sell a product based on what people will pay for it, not what it costs you.

Case and point: ~150 transcon fares.
J.Edward is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 3:21 pm
  #29  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Programs: UA 1K, CO One Pass Nothing, SPG Gold
Posts: 580
Originally Posted by mtparadis
If you're so angry that they make so much money off of you, stop buying their gas.
I'm not really angry because I work from home and don't have to do alot of driving....and btw I have yet to fill my tank since the hurricane...lol.

Trust me I understand supply and demand very well...although the Republican in me thinks you should sell at the highest price people will pay, there is a part of me that feels it is just very wrong to capitalize on a tragedy like this.
HMizzle is offline  
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 3:37 pm
  #30  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SDF
Posts: 3,302
Originally Posted by J.Edward
You sell a product based on what people will pay for it, not what it costs you.

Case and point: ~150 transcon fares.
You sell a product at the price(s) which will enable you to sell the amount you want for the highest profit (or loss in the case of airlines). $150 are used to fill potentially empty seats, however probably overused.
mtparadis is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.