![]() |
Just a thought...
I was just wondering... Instead of taking away the full EQM from all passeneger who book deep discounted coach fares online, why not offer only to elites full EQM no matter what the fare class booking is and regardless the booking channel? ... kind of an incentive to keep elites with OnePass...
just my two cents... -Vincent |
No - my friend did not mention any other pearls of wisdom - and I did not really ask.
Many of you already know this - but I did not. OP is run by marketing and NOT the OPSC. As the name implies, it is JUST a service center. ALL rules (as stupid and convoluted as they are) are made by Marketing - and then the poor souls have to solve them in the OPSC! For example - the THOUSANDS of flight segments that did not post correctly for the first part of the year had to be MANUALLY inputed via an Excel spreadsheet by the folks in the OPCS to correct them. Can you imagine how unhappy this made those folks? |
I wouldn't expect any announcement as such. Reality is the EQM bit is written in stone in the current elite guide-- thus, elite rules will remain unchanged from 2004 to 2005. It's just the co.com promotion that will expire-- just as every other 500 bonus or double mile promo quietly expires on the posted date.
I'm sad to see this happen, but to be frank, the writing was on the wall. This year, as a Plat, I have 2000 Elite miles-- a DCA-EWR-IAH where the agent was going to revoke the EWR-IAH 777 upgrade if I switched numbers. :mad: Luckily for me :rolleyes: we were delayed an extra hour on the aircraft in EWR. Most comfortable delay I've had. ;) |
Originally Posted by vincom
I was just wondering... Instead of taking away the full EQM from all passeneger who book deep discounted coach fares online, why not offer only to elites full EQM no matter what the fare class booking is and regardless the booking channel? ... kind of an incentive to keep elites with OnePass...
just my two cents... -Vincent Of note, I thought this article in USA Today was interesting and relevant: Lowest fares cost business fliers elite status Again, not sure if the ones making the rules even read the newspaper, let alone take this into consideration. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Nicksterguy
For example - the THOUSANDS of flight segments that did not post correctly for the first part of the year had to be MANUALLY inputed via an Excel spreadsheet by the folks in the OPCS to correct them. Can you imagine how unhappy this made those folks? Edited to add:
Originally Posted by Viajero Joven
I wouldn't expect any announcement as such. Reality is the EQM bit is written in stone in the current elite guide-- thus, elite rules will remain unchanged from 2004 to 2005.
|
Originally Posted by channa
Technically they don't have to announce anything. The 100% online EQM was a temporary promo anyway (valid thru 12/31/04).
Let's see more posts about status matches, even for us lowly Silvers. I'm more interested in AA and NWA, or anyone else who may actually fly out of InterContinental airport other than CO. EmailKid |
An interesting observation from that USA Today article...
It's only a matter of time before the major airlines respond to a loss of elite fliers, predicts Mitchell of the Business Travel Coalition. They could lower mileage requirements so that more people can keep their status or consider letting members pay a fee to maintain it. They could also completely revamp the existing programs, he says. "Before the majors figure out what to do, it means that some travelers are going to have less opportunity to upgrade," Mitchell says. Michael Boult of travel consultants Eclipse Advisors says he doubts employers are going to give their travelers much sympathy, because companies pay for the tickets. "The rush toward the lowest fares may have casualties," he says. Given there is a real risk to traveling employees losing their status because of online booking tools or being pushed to discount carriers (the article is the first public discussion of it I have seen outside FT), I find it even more incredulous that CO would continue on a path to exclude existing loyal customers. The more I think about it, the more amazed I am at their thinking. :mad: |
Originally Posted by emailkid
I'm more interested in AA and NWA
FewMiles Unofficial Guide to American Airlines AAdvantage would be an excellent starting place to read about AA's challenges. |
Originally Posted by dsimon
I do not believe that AA or NW will comp equivalent CO tier status. AA, however, will offer a Gold or Platinum Challenge for a short track route to elite status.
FewMiles Unofficial Guide to American Airlines AAdvantage would be an excellent starting place to read about AA's challenges. |
Originally Posted by xyzzy
My only problems with switching to UA are that they'll only give you one E+ companion seat and that they no longer fly EWR->LHR.
Seriously, I have been flying via IAD and often even via ORD (the fare isn't higher most of the time) or via RDU and ORD on AA. Consider that as a top tier on UA/AA, you will be flying BC at least 6/8 flights, can upgrade with miles easily and connecting through those airports give you more time to catch a good sleep on your BC seat. Of course, if you were in 31" CO coach, you would want the shortest route! There is very little benefit to flying CO internationally as an elite. |
Originally Posted by emailkid
Exactly !!!
Let's see more posts about status matches, even for us lowly Silvers. I'm more interested in AA and NWA, or anyone else who may actually fly out of InterContinental airport other than CO. EmailKid My suggestion is ignore the CO news for now, and let's see what kind of pressure DL puts on everyone with their big announcement this week. It is bound to stir up the pot and require a competitive response from other carriers...including CO, unless they are busy drinking their fancy kool-aid. |
Originally Posted by bocastephen
I would be careful about jumping to NWA until you know for sure they won't join the EQM bandwagon themselves. They just stopped awarded full credit for discounted DL tickets and I know there are some sweaty palms over at the NW board.
My suggestion is ignore the CO news for now, and let's see what kind of pressure DL puts on everyone with their big announcement this week. It is bound to stir up the pot and require a competitive response from other carriers...including CO, unless they are busy drinking their fancy kool-aid. It is true that NWA MIGHT switch to 50% EQM at some point on some fares. We do not know that. NW also matched CO with 50% EQM on CO operated flights. I don't see NWA in a rush to give 50% EQM to their own elites on their own planes. NWA does seem to be the more customer friendly of the three. |
Originally Posted by wldtrvlr
NW dropping the EQM on DL was to come in line with DL's policy. I guess they got tired of giving NW elites more for flying on DL than DL elites flying on DL were getting.
It is true that NWA MIGHT switch to 50% EQM at some point on some fares. We do not know that. NW also matched CO with 50% EQM on CO operated flights. I don't see NWA in a rush to give 50% EQM to their own elites on their own planes. NWA does seem to be the more customer friendly of the three. |
Ugly rumors...
Ugly rumors (From the Mars Hotel?)
I am in occasional contact the manager of Onepass. I have been told that the rumor posted at the top of this thread is untrue. Further, I am told that CO is seriously looking at extending the 100% EQM on Continental.com offer and that an announcement will be made in the next few weeks.. |
Originally Posted by xyzzy
Ugly rumors (From the Mars Hotel?)
I am in occasional contact the manager of Onepass. I have been told that the rumor posted at the top of this thread is untrue. Further, I am told that CO is seriously looking at extending the 100% EQM on Continental.com offer and that an announcement will be made in the next few weeks.. However, I stand by what I posted above and what I was told. The person who told me said that the decision had been made. Let's see what happens. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 8:42 am. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.